Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07250867

Safety and Efficacy of Lidocaine Versus Ketamine Infusion for Resistant Orofacial Pain

Phase II Interventional Orofacial Pain

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Lidocaine Intravenous Infusion, Ketamine intravenous infusion, Combined lidocaine and ketamine intravenous infusion.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Orofacial Pain. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Safety and Efficacy of Lidocaine Versus Ketamine Infusion or Both Together as a Treatment Modality in Patient With Resistant Orofacial Pain; Double Blinded Randomized Study.

Overview

A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of intravenous lidocaine, ketamine, and their combination as treatment options for patients suffering from treatment-resistant orofacial pain. The study measures pain reduction primarily using the Visual Analog Scale and evaluates safety and tolerability over a follow-up period of 6 months.

Detailed description

This study aims to assess and compare the analgesic efficacy and safety profiles of intravenous lidocaine, ketamine, and a combined infusion of both in adult patients with orofacial pain that is resistant to conventional medical or interventional therapies. Using a randomized, double-blind design, 105 patients will be allocated equally into three parallel groups receiving either lidocaine infusion (5 mg/kg over 4 hours), ketamine infusion (0.3 mg/kg over 4 hours), or a combination infusion of lidocaine (2.5 mg/kg) and ketamine (0.15 mg/kg) over 3 consecutive weeks. Primary efficacy will be assessed by changes in pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from baseline through follow-up visits at the 2nd and 3rd infusions, and 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include cortisol level changes, depression assessment via PLAT-Q, and adverse events monitored during and after infusions. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria will ensure patient safety and reliability of results. Data will be analyzed using one-way ANOVA and repeated measures ANOVA for continuous variables with significance set at p \< 0.05.

Interventions

  • Drug Lidocaine Intravenous Infusion
    Participants receive a slow intravenous infusion of lidocaine at a dose of 5 mg/kg (not exceeding 500 mg in total), diluted in 0.9% saline and administered over a 4-hour period, once weekly for three consecutive weeks. Continuous monitoring of cardiovascular and neurological status is provided during and after infusion to assess for efficacy and safety in cases of treatment-resistant orofacial pain.
  • Drug Ketamine intravenous infusion
    Participants receive a slow intravenous infusion of ketamine at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg, diluted in 0.9% saline and delivered over 4 hours, once weekly for three consecutive weeks. The procedure includes monitoring for cardiovascular and CNS adverse effects. This intervention aims to evaluate the analgesic and safety profile of ketamine in patients with persistent orofacial pain unresponsive to standard therapies.
  • Drug Combined lidocaine and ketamine intravenous infusion
    Participants receive a single intravenous infusion containing both lidocaine (2.5 mg/kg) and ketamine (0.15 mg/kg) diluted in 0.9% saline, administered over 4 hours, once weekly for three consecutive weeks. This intervention is designed to determine whether the combination of lidocaine and ketamine provides synergistic analgesic effects and improved tolerability compared to either drug alone in treating resistant orofacial pain.

Primary outcome measures

  • Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score [Time frame: Baseline, prior to 2nd infusion, prior to 3rd infusion, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after intervention]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

\- Adults aged > 18 years

Resistant orofacial pain patients with failed medical or interventional treatment

Diagnosed with one or more of the following:

Trigeminal neuralgia

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction

Malignant otitis externa

Migraine

Atypical facial pain

Exclusion criteria

\- Debilitating cardiac disease

Uncontrolled hypertension

Known allergies to lidocaine or ketamine

Severe renal or hepatic impairment

Pregnancy or breastfeeding

History of substance abuse

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07250867 · Lidocaine versus Ketamine

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗