Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07248943

Contralateral Neural Tissue Mobilization for Cervical Radiculopathy

No phase Interventional Cervical Radiculopathy Pain Neuropathic Pain Radicular Pain

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Contralateral Neural Tissue Mobilization (NTM).
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Cervical Radiculopathy, Pain, Neuropathic Pain, Radicular Pain. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Contralateral Neural Tissue Mobilization for Cervical Radiculopathy: An Exploratory Study

Overview

Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a common form of peripheral neuropathic pain characterized by neck and upper extremity symptoms in a dermatomal distribution. Neural tissue mobilization (NTM) is an intervention shown to provide benefit for neuropathic pain presentations; however, some patients are unable to tolerate direct treatment of the symptomatic limb due to allodynia, hyperalgesia, or fear of movement. Early evidence from lower-extremity research suggests that contralateral NTM may produce therapeutic effects similar to ipsilateral treatment, but this approach has not been investigated in individuals with upper-extremity symptoms. This exploratory case series aims to examine the immediate effects of contralateral NTM in adults presenting to outpatient physical therapy with CR. Participants will undergo pre- and post-treatment assessments of pain intensity, disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain distribution, and neurodynamic mechanosensitivity. Findings will provide preliminary evidence regarding whether contralateral NTM may serve as a viable treatment option when direct symptomatic limb treatment is not tolerated.

Detailed description

Background and Rationale:

Pain phenotyping has emerged as an important clinical framework within physical therapy, enabling classification of pain presentations on the basis of pain mechanisms, clinical features, and patient-reported symptoms. Current pain phenotyping models identify three primary mechanisms: nociceptive, peripheral neuropathic, and nociplastic pain. Peripheral neuropathic pain is estimated to account for approximately one-quarter of patients presenting to outpatient physical therapy. It is characterized by pain arising from a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system, with complex underlying biological mechanisms including neurogenic inflammation, immune dysregulation, demyelination, axonal loss, ion channel changes, and vascular alterations. Clinically, peripheral neuropathic pain commonly presents with pain in dermatomal or cutaneous nerve distributions, a history of nerve injury or mechanical compromise, and symptom provocation during neurodynamic or palpatory testing.

Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a frequent and well-recognized form of peripheral neuropathic pain. CR most often results from intervertebral disc herniation or spondylosis, typically affecting the C7, C6, and C8 nerve roots. Patients commonly present with neck pain, upper extremity pain, and/or sensory, motor, or reflex deficits. Current evidence suggests that when patient presentation aligns with a peripheral neuropathic phenotype, interventions should be matched accordingly. Neural tissue mobilization (NTM) has demonstrated effectiveness in individuals with chronic neck and arm pain and is believed to exert beneficial effects through improvements in neuromeningeal mobility, blood flow, intraneural and extraneural fluid dynamics, inflammatory modulation, and graded exposure to movement.

However, some patients with CR present with significant allodynia, hyperalgesia, or fear of movement, making direct treatment of the symptomatic extremity challenging. Basic neuroanatomy and preliminary research suggest that contralateral NTM may produce therapeutic effects similar to ipsilateral NTM. Although early work in the lower extremity-including one clinical trial and one case study-has shown that contralateral NTM can reduce pain related to lumbar radiculopathy, this concept has not yet been explored in the upper extremity. Therefore, this exploratory study seeks to examine whether contralateral NTM produces immediate positive effects in patients presenting to physical therapy with CR.

Study Design:

This investigation uses a case-series design with pre- and post-intervention measures. A convenience sample will be recruited from four outpatient physical therapy clinics specializing in musculoskeletal pain. Clinicians participating in the study must have completed at least a 2-day (15-hour) post-professional training course in pain science and assessment of peripheral neuropathic pain, including instruction in NTM.

A total of approximately 40 patients aged 18 years or older will be recruited over a 3-month period. Eligible individuals must demonstrate unilateral arm pain in a dermatomal distribution consistent with CR, with or without neck pain. Exclusion criteria include bilateral upper-extremity pain, non-dermatomal pain, contraindications to NTM on the contralateral limb (e.g., recent surgery, significant tissue injury, allodynia), inability to read English, or unwillingness to consent.

Procedures and Outcome Measures:

After obtaining written informed consent, participants will complete baseline (pre-intervention) measures including:

Demographic questionnaire (non-identifiable data only)

Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for upper-extremity pain

Neck Disability Index (NDI)

Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire - Physical Activity subscale (FABQ-PA)

Pain drawing, quantified using a standardized grid overlay

Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1a (ULNT1a) of the affected limb, including goniometric measurement of elbow extension at symptom onset

Following baseline measures, each participant will receive a single treatment session of contralateral NTM, performed on the limb opposite the symptomatic side. The intervention consists of 8-10 minutes of standardized passive neurodynamic mobilizations in supine with specific variations in cervical positioning, followed by active "slider" and "tensioner" exercises in sitting.

Immediately after the intervention, participants will repeat all outcome measures (NPRS, FABQ-PA, pain drawing, and ULNT1a). After data collection is complete, clinical care will proceed according to the treating clinician's usual practice and will not be influenced by study procedures.

Data Handling and Analysis:

All data packets will be de-identified and coded by clinic and clinician. Data will be transferred to a secure electronic spreadsheet for analysis. Descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, frequencies, and percentages) will summarize demographic variables and baseline characteristics. Pre- to post-intervention changes will be evaluated using paired t-tests with statistical significance set at p \< 0.05.

Purpose of the Study:

The purpose of this exploratory case series is to determine whether contralateral neural tissue mobilization produces immediate changes in pain intensity, disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain distribution, and neurodynamic mechanosensitivity among individuals presenting with clinical features of cervical radiculopathy. Findings may inform future research and contribute to clinical understanding of whether contralateral NTM is a viable treatment option in patients unable to tolerate direct treatment of the symptomatic extremity

Interventions

  • Behavioral Contralateral Neural Tissue Mobilization (NTM)
    A standardized 8-10 minute contralateral NTM protocol will be performed and includes: 1. Supine passive neurodynamic mobilization (ULNT1a pattern) with: * Cervical side flexion toward the non-symptomatic side * Movement to the point of resistance * 1-2 seconds of gentle engagement followed by release * Repeated 15 times 2. Supine passive neurodynamic mobilization with: * Neutral cervical position * Repeated 15 times 3. Supine passive neurodynamic mobilization with: * Cer

Primary outcome measures

  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [Time frame: Pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention (same session).]
  • Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1a (ULNT1a) - Elbow Extension Range [Time frame: Pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention (same session).]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Neck Disability Index (NDI) [Time frame: Pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention (same session).]
  • Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire - Physical Activity Subscale (FABQ-PA) [Time frame: Pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention (same session).]
  • Pain Drawing Area (Body Chart Grid Count) [Time frame: Pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention (same session).]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older Presence of unilateral upper-extremity pain in a dermatomal distribution consistent with cervical radiculopathy (with or without neck pain)
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent
  • New patient to the clinic or established patient who meets inclusion criteria and has not previously received neural tissue mobilization as part of treatment

Exclusion criteria

  • Bilateral upper-extremity pain
  • Upper-extremity pain that is non-dermatomal in distribution
  • Presence of contraindications or precautions preventing use of the contralateral limb for neural tissue mobilization (e.g., injury, allodynia, recent surgery, postsurgical complications)
  • Not willing to participate in the study

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Publications

  • Latimer J, Maher C, Refshauge K. The attitudes and beliefs of physiotherapy students to chronic back pain. Clin J Pain. 2004 Jan-Feb;20(1):45-50. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200401000-00009. PMID 14668656
  • Gurudut P, Sherpa LB. Comparison of Ipsilateral Versus Contralateral LOwer Limb Neural Mobilization in Unilateral Lumbar Radiculopathy - A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Physiother. 2021;8(1):26-30.
  • Louw A, Schmidt SG, Louw C, Puentedura EJ. Moving without moving: immediate management following lumbar spine surgery using a graded motor imagery approach: a case report. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(7):509-17. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1060656. PMID 26395828
  • Gilbert KK, Smith MP, Sobczak S, James CR, Sizer PS, Brismee JM. Effects of lower limb neurodynamic mobilization on intraneural fluid dispersion of the fourth lumbar nerve root: an unembalmed cadaveric investigation. J Man Manip Ther. 2015 Dec;23(5):239-45. doi: 10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000009. PMID 26955255
  • Song XJ, Gan Q, Cao JL, Wang ZB, Rupert RL. Spinal manipulation reduces pain and hyperalgesia after lumbar intervertebral foramen inflammation in the rat. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jan;29(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.10.001. PMID 16396724
  • Varangot-Reille C, Cuenca-Martinez F, Arribas-Romano A, Bertoletti-Rodriguez R, Gutierrez-Martin A, Mateo-Perrino F, Suso-Marti L, Blanco-Diaz M, Calatayud J, Casana J. Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization Techniques in the Management of Musculoskeletal Neck Disorders with Nerve-Related Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Mapping Report. Pain Med. 2022 Apr 8;23(4):707-732. doi: PMID 34633462
  • Basson A, Olivier B, Ellis R, Coppieters M, Stewart A, Mudzi W. The Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization for Neuromusculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Sep;47(9):593-615. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7117. Epub 2017 Jul 13. PMID 28704626
  • Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, An HS, Ikuta Y, Yasuda M. The anatomic relation among the nerve roots, intervertebral foramina, and intervertebral discs of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Feb 1;25(3):286-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00005. PMID 10703098

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07248943 · ContralateralNTM2025

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗