Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07246538

Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) System Evaluation in Volunteers

No phase Interventional Obstruction Airway

For patients and families

In plain language

Fill the application

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: CPAP.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Obstruction Airway. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Evaluation of a Novel Positive Airway Pressure System in Volunteers

Overview

This study will test the control and measurements of a new system for airway support in healthy volunteers. The goals of the study are to evaluate how accurately the system can stabilize airway pressure to a desired level, evaluate the accuracy of the system's reported volume of each breath (tidal volume), evaluate the accuracy of the system's reported respiratory rate, evaluate the accuracy of exhaled carbon dioxide monitoring with a standard carbon dioxide monitor when the novel PAP system is used, and evaluate general comfort of the volunteers while using the system.

Detailed description

Sedation procedures involve administering drugs to patients that reduce awareness and pain without complete loss of consciousness. A common side effect of these drugs is partial or complete obstruction of the airway by the airway tissue, inhibiting the flow of oxygen to the lungs. Research has shown that this risk can be effectively reduced by administering PAP therapy during sedation, which involves directing air flow into a tight-fitting mask over the patient's nostrils and/or mouth. However, non-invasive ventilators used for administering PAP therapy are expensive and large, and often not available in areas of the hospital where sedation procedures take place.

The investigators have developed a small and low-cost novel PAP system for use in sedation procedures that controls airway pressure to desired levels (a feature that is generally only available in larger and higher-cost devices), provides estimates for tidal volumes (generally only available with a non-invasive ventilator), provides respiratory rate estimates, and allows for more accurate monitoring of exhaled carbon dioxide with a standard carbon dioxide monitor using a novel approach that to the investigator's knowledge has not been published. The goal of investigator's study is to demonstrate the accuracy of these features in human subjects. The system is much smaller and less expensive than a non-invasive ventilator, provides enhanced respiratory monitoring, and has the potential to be a practical alternative that would make PAP therapy during sedation much more feasible.

The investigator's evaluation will primarily include evaluating the investigator's system's performance against an FDA cleared commercial respiratory monitor to verify accuracy. The investigators anticipate that the investigator's system will automatically adjust oxygen flow to maintain a desired airway pressure even in the presence of variables such as mask leak and patient inhalation flow. The investigators also anticipate that the investigator's system will provide tidal volume estimates within 15% of the respiratory monitor reference measurement, as well as respiratory rate estimates that closely match the respiratory monitor. The investigator's system employs a method that detects when the patient exhales and removes mask pressure during exhalation, and the investigators anticipate that this will result in improved comfort for the patient, as well as improved carbon dioxide monitoring accuracy, since removing flow during exhalation reduces dilution of the expired gas sample that is used for measuring exhaled carbon dioxide levels.

Interventions

  • Device CPAP
    Airway pressure support through the investigational device.

Primary outcome measures

  • Tidal Volume Accuracy [Time frame: During the intervention]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Respiratory Rate [Time frame: During the intervention]
  • EtCO2 [Time frame: During the intervention]
  • Mask Pressure Control Accuracy [Time frame: During the intervention]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy volunteers

Exclusion criteria

  • Have any respiratory or cardiovascular conditions
  • i.e., cold, allergies, congestion, pneumonia, lung cancer, COPD, acute respiratory distress syndrome, etc.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Device feasibility

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Publications

  • Burk KM, Sakata DJ, Kuck K, Orr JA. Comparing Nasal End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Measurement Variation and Agreement While Delivering Pulsed and Continuous Flow Oxygen in Volunteers and Patients. Anesth Analg. 2020 Mar;130(3):715-724. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004004. PMID 30633057
  • Fogarty M, Orr JA, Sakata D, Brewer L, Johnson K, Fang JC, Kuck K. A comparison of ventilation with a non-invasive ventilator versus standard O2 with a nasal cannula for colonoscopy with moderate sedation using propofol. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Dec;34(6):1215-1221. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00426-5. Epub 2019 Nov 23. PMID 31760586

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07246538 · IRB_00190165

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗