Acute Effects of TENS on Cervical Muscle Stiffness and Pain in Neck Pain
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Sham TENS.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Neck Pain, Chronic Neck Pain, Muscle Stiffness, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation. Basic parameters: 18 years — 50 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Turkey (Türkiye)
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Acute Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Passive Muscle Stiffness and Pain in Patients With Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
This randomized controlled trial investigates the acute effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on passive cervical muscle stiffness (MyotonPro "dynamic stiffness", N/m) and pain (0-10 VAS) in adults with chronic/mechanical neck pain. Participants will be allocated 1:1 to TENS or control/sham. Outcomes are measured immediately before and immediately after a single 15-minute session.
Detailed description
Background/Rationale: TENS modulates superficial afferent input and may reduce pain and muscle tone. However, its immediate impact on objective passive muscle stiffness measured by a handheld myotonometer (MyotonPro) in neck pain is insufficiently characterized. This trial tests whether a brief, low-risk intervention produces measurable changes in mechanical muscle properties and perceived pain in a short time window.
Objectives/Hypotheses:
Primary objective: Determine whether conventional TENS acutely reduces dynamic stiffness of the upper trapezius compared with control/sham.
Secondary objectives: Evaluate pain (VAS), additional MyotonPro parameters (frequency/tone, logarithmic decrement, relaxation time, creep), and safety/tolerability.
Hypothesis: TENS will show a significant group × time interaction favoring TENS over control/sham.
Design: Single-center (optionally multi-center), parallel-group, randomized (1:1) RCT. Masking: at minimum outcome assessor-blinded; participant blinding if sham TENS is used.
Sample Size: n = 24 (12 per arm), based on a priori power analysis (f≈0.40, α=0.05, power=0.95) for a 2×2 mixed design.
Intervention (TENS): Conventional mode; \~80 Hz, ≤150 µs pulse width; 15 minutes; intensity "strong but tolerable" without visible muscle contraction. Electrodes placed over the most painful/stiff segments (typically upper trapezius and/or suboccipital region), preferably bilateral.
Control/Sham: No intervention or sham TENS (electrodes applied; intensity raised to sensation then reduced below perception/zero; device indicators remain on).
Assessments \& Timing:
Time points: T0 (pre-session), T1 (immediately post-session).
Primary outcome: Upper trapezius dynamic stiffness (N/m)-three repetitions averaged at a standardized anatomical landmark.
Secondary outcomes: Pain VAS (0-10); MyotonPro frequency/tone, decrement, relaxation time, creep on upper trapezius ± SCM ± cervical extensors; adverse events/tolerability. (Neck Disability Index may be collected at baseline for descriptive characterization.)
Statistical Plan: Mixed-effects repeated-measures analysis with Group (TENS vs control/sham) × Time (T0 vs T1); assumption checks with robust alternatives/transformations as needed; multiple-comparison controls; effect sizes reported.
Eligibility (summary): Adults 18-50 years with neck pain VAS ≥3/10. Key exclusions include pacemaker, pregnancy, recent invasive procedures (≤6 weeks), significant dermatologic issues at electrode sites, cervical radiculopathy/neurological signs, acute neck injury. (Full list in Eligibility.)
Safety: Low-risk, non-invasive procedure. Expected adverse effects are minor (e.g., transient discomfort or skin irritation). AE/SAE monitoring is prospective; the session will be stopped if intolerable symptoms occur.
Interventions
- Device Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Conventional mode TENS, frequency \~80 Hz, pulse width ≤150 µs, duration 20 minutes. Intensity set to "strong but tolerable" without visible muscle contraction. Electrodes placed bilaterally over the most painful/stiff segments (e.g., upper trapezius midpoint along C7-acromion line; adjustments per comfort - Device Sham TENS
Electrodes applied at the same anatomical sites as the active arm. Device indicators remain on; intensity is ramped to perception briefly and then reduced to sub-sensory/zero so that no effective current is delivered for the remainder of the 20-minute session. Procedures and clinician-participant interactions mirror the active arm
Primary outcome measures
- Change in upper trapezius dynamic stiffness [Time frame: Pre-session (T0) and immediately post-session (T1; within 5 minutes of session end)]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- Change in pain intensity [Time frame: T0 and immediately post-session]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age 18-50 years.
Neck pain VAS ≥ 3/10 at screening and on test day.
Clinical diagnosis of chronic or mechanical neck pain (≥6 weeks).
Able to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent.
Willing to refrain from analgesics/muscle relaxants and vigorous neck/shoulder exercise for 24 hours before testing.
Exclusion criteria
- Cervical radiculopathy or neurological signs (myotomal weakness, dermatomal sensory loss, reflex changes).
Recent invasive procedures to the neck/shoulder (e.g., surgery, injections, radiofrequency/neurotomy) within 6 weeks.
Pacemaker/implantable cardioverter, or other active implanted electronic device.
Pregnancy or planning pregnancy.
Skin conditions at electrode sites (open wounds, infection, severe dermatitis) or known allergy to electrode adhesive/gel.
History of epilepsy or unexplained syncope.
Acute neck trauma (<6 weeks) or red flags (fracture, malignancy, infection, inflammatory rheumatic disease).
Systemic disorders likely to affect outcomes (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes with neuropathy, severe cardiovascular disease, fibromyalgia with widespread pain).
Ongoing electrotherapy to the neck region or botulinum toxin injections to cervical muscles within 3 months.
Inability to comply with procedures (e.g., severe communication/cognitive impairment), or insufficient proficiency in Turkish to complete measures.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
- Erzurum Technical University Faculty of Health Sciences — Erzurum
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07244861 · ETU-TENS-NECK-RCT-02 · Erzurum Technical University