Menu
Recruiting NCT07243522

The Effect of Birth Positions on Labor

No phase Interventional Primipara Pregnant Primipara Labour

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Semi-sitting birth position.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Primipara Pregnant, Primipara Labour. Basic parameters: 18 years — 35 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Turkey (Türkiye)
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

The Effect of Birth Positions on Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength, Severity, and Quality of Perineal Pain in Primiparous Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

This study is a randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the effects of positions used during labor on pelvic floor muscle strength and the severity and nature of perineal pain in primiparous pregnant women. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends supporting women's freedom of movement during the second stage of labor and encouraging upright birthing positions. However, in many countries, births are still performed in supine or lithotomy positions, and knowledge and practice regarding upright positions persist. This situation points to a significant knowledge and practice gap for both birthing women and healthcare professionals. The study will be conducted at the Birth Unit of Bakırçay University Çiğli Training and Research Hospital, Izmir. Following ethics committee approval, the study will be conducted within one year. The sample will consist of 70 primiparous pregnant women who present to the birth unit and meet the inclusion criteria. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups via random.org. Pregnant women in the intervention group will deliver in the Semi-Fowler's (semi-sitting) position, while those in the control group will deliver in the lithotomy position, which is the hospital's standard practice. Data will be collected in two stages. In the first stage, data will be collected at the onset of labor and when cervical dilation reaches 8-10 cm. In the second stage, data will be collected within 24 hours after delivery, at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Data collection tools will be administered to each woman a total of five times in the first and second stages. Pelvic floor muscle strength will be assessed both objectively with a perineometer and subjectively with the Oxford scale. The severity and nature of perineal pain will be measured with the McGill Pain Scale Short Form. The hypotheses of the study are that delivering in a semi-sitting position will increase pelvic floor muscle strength and reduce perineal pain. The data will be analyzed using the SPSS 23 software package, using parametric and non-parametric tests. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis will be applied when necessary to mitigate the impact of data loss. This study aims to evaluate not only the effects of birthing positions on the labor process but also their impact on women's health in the postpartum period. This research, which will contribute to expanding the limited literature on this topic, is also expected to support the widespread adoption of a woman-centered approach to care in maternity services.

Detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the effects of positions used during labor on pelvic floor muscle strength and the severity and nature of perineal pain in primiparous pregnant women. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends supporting women's freedom of movement during the second stage of labor and encouraging upright birthing positions. However, in many countries, births are still performed in supine or lithotomy positions, and knowledge and practice regarding upright positions persist. This situation points to a significant knowledge and practice gap for both birthing women and healthcare professionals.

The study will be conducted at the Birth Unit of Bakırçay University Çiğli Training and Research Hospital, Izmir. Following ethics committee approval, the study will be conducted within one year. The sample will consist of 70 primiparous pregnant women who present to the birth unit and meet the inclusion criteria. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups via random.org. Pregnant women in the intervention group will deliver in the Semi-Fowler's (semi-sitting) position, while those in the control group will deliver in the lithotomy position, which is the hospital's standard practice.

Data will be collected in two stages. In the first stage, data will be collected at the onset of labor and when cervical dilation reaches 8-10 cm. In the second stage, data will be collected within 24 hours after delivery, at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Data collection tools will be administered to each woman a total of five times in the first and second stages. Pelvic floor muscle strength will be assessed both objectively with a perineometer and subjectively with the Oxford scale. The severity and nature of perineal pain will be measured with the McGill Pain Scale Short Form.

The hypotheses of the study are that delivering in a semi-sitting position will increase pelvic floor muscle strength and reduce perineal pain. The data will be analyzed using the SPSS 23 software package, using parametric and non-parametric tests. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis will be applied when necessary to mitigate the impact of data loss.

This study aims to evaluate not only the effects of birthing positions on the labor process but also their impact on women's health in the postpartum period. This research, which will contribute to expanding the limited literature on this topic, is also expected to support the widespread adoption of a woman-centered approach to care in maternity services.

Interventions

  • Other Semi-sitting birth position
    Pregnant women who present to the maternity unit, meet the inclusion criteria, are assigned to the intervention group after randomization, and agree to participate in the study will be informed about birthing positions by the primary investigator. During the pilot study for the study, it was determined that the ideal position, considering clinical conditions, patient safety, and comfort, is Semi-sittin. Therefore, pregnant women in the intervention group will deliver in the Semi-sitting position

Primary outcome measures

  • Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength Measurement [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of postpartum at 6 months]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Perineal Pain [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of postpartum at 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Being between 18 and 35 years of age
  • Being primiparous
  • Being at term (37-42 weeks)
  • Being in the latent phase of the first stage of labor
  • Being in the vertex position, having a single, live fetus
  • Having an estimated fetal weight between 2500 and 4000 grams
  • Having a maternal Body Mass Index <30
  • Pregnant women who are expected to give birth vaginally
  • Ability to understand and speak Turkish
  • Volunteer to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Non-cephalic presentation
  • Chronic diseases (heart disease, epilepsy, hypertension, hypothyroidism, diabetes, and kidney disease, etc.)
  • Risk of obstetric complications (gestational hypertension, cephalopelvic disproportion, antepartum hemorrhage, intrauterine growth restriction, premature rupture of membranes, etc.)
  • History of pelvic surgery
  • History of prolapse surgery
  • History of collagen disorder
  • Severe anemia
  • Presence of genital tract infection
  • Abnormalities of the vulva (presence of vulvar edema, scarring, etc.)
  • Application of fundal pressure
  • Interventional delivery (use of forceps/vacuum during the second stage, etc.)
  • Cesarean section
  • Fetal (risk/presence of congenital malformations, estimated fetal weight <2500 g or >4000 g)

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Supportive care

Study locations

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
  • Izmir Bakircay University Cigli Training and Research Hospital — Izmir

Publications

  • Bozkurt M, Yumru AE, Sahin L. Pelvic floor dysfunction, and effects of pregnancy and mode of delivery on pelvic floor. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.08.001. PMID 25510682
  • Catanzarite T, Bremner S, Barlow CL, Bou-Malham L, O'Connor S, Alperin M. Pelvic muscles' mechanical response to strains in the absence and presence of pregnancy-induced adaptations in a rat model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):512.e1-512.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 9. PMID 29432755
  • Alperin M, Lawley DM, Esparza MC, Lieber RL. Pregnancy-induced adaptations in the intrinsic structure of rat pelvic floor muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;213(2):191.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 May 13. PMID 25979618
  • Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP, Singata M, Habib NA, Landoulsi S, Gulmezoglu AM. Does gentle assisted pushing or giving birth in the upright position reduce the duration of the second stage of labour? A three-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial in South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Jun 29;3(3):e000906. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000906. eCollection 2018. PMID 29989055
  • Dabral, A., Pawar, P., Bharti, R., Kumari, A., Batra, A., ve Arora, R. (2018). Upright kneeling position during second stage of labor: a pilot study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obst Gynecol, 7(2), (s.401-407).
  • Berta M, Lindgren H, Christensson K, Mekonnen S, Adefris M. Effect of maternal birth positions on duration of second stage of labor: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 4;19(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2620-0. PMID 31801479
  • Deliktas A, Kukulu K. A meta-analysis of the effect on maternal health of upright positions during the second stage of labour, without routine epidural analgesia. J Adv Nurs. 2018 Feb;74(2):263-278. doi: 10.1111/jan.13447. Epub 2017 Oct 4. PMID 28881046
  • Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5(5):CD002006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub4. PMID 28539008

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07243522 · 25-AKD-139

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗