Acute Effects of Hot-Pack Therapy in Low Back Pain
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Hot-Pack, Sham Pack.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Low Back Pain, Back Pain. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Acute Effects of Hot-pack Therapy on Lumbar Erector Spinae Muscle Stiffness and Pain in Adults With Low Back Pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Overview
This single-centre, parallel-group randomized controlled trial will test whether one session of moist hot-pack therapy produces immediate improvements in pain intensity and lumbar erector spinae muscle stiffness in adults with nonspecific low back pain. Participants are randomized 1:1 to hot-pack or sham (room-temperature pack). Outcomes are assessed at baseline and immediately after the session using VAS (0-10 cm) and MyotonPro; a short follow-up (24-48 h) captures Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and perceived change. The intervention is brief, low-risk, and commonly used in clinical practice, yet high-quality evidence on its acute effects is limited.
Detailed description
Rationale. Hot-pack (thermotherapy) is frequently prescribed to reduce pain and muscle tension in low back pain, but controlled evidence quantifying immediate changes in muscle mechanical properties and pain remains scarce. Demonstrating short-term benefits with objective measures (MyotonPro) and validated scales (VAS, ODI) could inform pragmatic care pathways for nonspecific low back pain.
Objectives and Hypotheses. Primary objective: determine whether a single hot-pack session reduces erector spinae stiffness (MyotonPro) and pain (VAS) versus sham. Secondary objective: explore short-term effects on functional disability (ODI) and perceived improvement. We hypothesize greater immediate reductions in stiffness and pain, and better short-term function, with hot-pack versus sham.
Design and Setting. Prospective, two-arm, parallel RCT at Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine (Physical Medicine \& Rehabilitation / Orthopedics). Target sample: 30 adults (pilot). Allocation is 1:1 using computer-generated randomization; outcome assessors and participants are blinded.
Participants. Adults 18-65 y with nonspecific/mechanical low back pain and baseline VAS ≥ 3/10. Key exclusions include pregnancy, pacemaker/implanted devices, recent lumbar surgery or heat/cold therapy (\<6 weeks), dermatologic lesions, neurologic deficit, tumour, or systemic inflammatory disease. Written informed consent is obtained before any procedure.
Interventions.
Hot-pack (Active): Moist hot-pack at 60-65 °C applied over the lumbar region for 20 minutes with a 6-8 towel barrier. Skin is checked at minutes 5 and 10.
Sham (Comparator): Identical setup using a room-temperature pack (no heat).
Outcome Measures and Timing.
Primary: Change in pain intensity (VAS, 0-10 cm) from pre- to immediate post-intervention.
Key Secondary: Change in erector spinae stiffness (MyotonPro) from pre- to immediate post-intervention; ODI at 24-48 h; patient-reported perceived change.
Procedures. After screening and consent, baseline demographics and outcomes are recorded. MyotonPro measurements are taken over the lumbar erector spinae at L3-L4, 2-3 cm lateral, with three repeats per point and averaged. Post-session, VAS and MyotonPro are repeated; ODI and a brief perceived-change item are collected 24-48 h later. All assessments are performed by trained physiotherapists following device protocols and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Randomization, Masking, and Data Handling. Randomization is computer-assisted (1:1). Participants and assessors are blinded to group assignment via a sham procedure mirroring the active setup. Data are recorded with coded IDs and analysed with mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA (group × time), reporting effect sizes and 95% CIs.
Interventions
- Device Hot-Pack
Thermal therapy delivered via a moist hot-pack applied to the lumbar area for 20 minutes. Target pack surface temp ≈60-65 °C at application; 6-8 towel layers to prevent burns; patient positioned prone or side-lying per comfort. Skin integrity checked at minutes 5 and 10; session stopped if adverse reactions occur. Single session only. - Device Sham Pack
Placebo thermotherapy control using a room-temperature pack with identical preparation, towel barriers, positioning, and duration (20 minutes) as the active intervention. No heat is delivered. Used to preserve participant blinding.
Primary outcome measures
- Change in Lumbar Erector Spinae Stiffness (MyotonPro, N/m) From Baseline to Immediate Post-Intervention [Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-session (~20-30 minutes)]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- Change in Pain Intensity (VAS, 0-10) From Baseline to Immediate Post-Intervention [Time frame: Baseline (pre-session) and immediately post-session (~20-30 minutes after start]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Adults aged 18-65 years
Nonspecific/mechanical low back pain (clinical diagnosis)
Baseline pain ≥3/10 on a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Able to understand procedures and provide written informed consent
Able to attend baseline, immediate post-session, and 24-48 h follow-up assessments
Exclusion criteria
- Neurologic deficit, tumour, or systemic inflammatory disease
Prior lumbar spine surgery
Heat or cold therapy to the lumbar region within the past 6 weeks
Dermatologic lesions, open wounds, or skin conditions over the lumbar area
Contraindications to heat (e.g., impaired sensation/neuropathy over the area, severe circulatory disorders)
Pregnancy
Implanted electronic devices (e.g., pacemaker)
Inability to comply with the study schedule or procedures
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Double blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07242183 · ETU-PMR-HOTPACK-2025-RCT-v3