Menu
Recruiting NCT07225660

Hormonal Optimization: Late vs. Immediate Start After Discontinuation of Oral Contraceptives in Assisted Reproductive technologY (HOLIDAY)

No phase Interventional Fertility Preservation

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: OCP pause.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Fertility Preservation. Basic parameters: 18 years — 40 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial Assessing Hormonal Optimization: Late vs. Immediate Start After Discontinuation of Oral Contraceptives in Assisted Reproductive technologY (HOLIDAY)

Overview

HOLIDAY is a two-arm, parallel-group, multi-center, randomized trial in which subjects undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation will be randomized to receive either a 2-month pause of Combined Hormonal Contraceptives (CHC) or immediate start (without a pause).

Detailed description

Reproductive aging in women is a continuous process that begins prior to birth and extends until menopause. The primary mechanism behind this process is the depletion of the ovarian pool of non-growing follicles (NGFs). Previous models, such as the biphasic-exponential model, have postulated that female fertility prominently declines with age, significantly after age 32, and with a more accelerated rate after age 35. Newer models of ovarian follicular depletion predict no sudden change in decay rate but rather a constantly, increasing rate.

With the advent of vitrification, oocyte cryopreservation has become a powerful tool to help preserve female fertility potential against anticipated gamete exhaustion. At the same time, as more women choose to delay childbearing for various reasons, planned oocyte preservation is increasing in popularity. Continued optimization of protocols has led to improved outcomes with good oocyte yields. For women undergoing oocyte cryopreservation who are not actively attempting to conceive, endometrial development does not need to be synchronized with the oocytes. Thus, ovarian stimulation can be initiated irrespective of the phase of the menstrual cycle without adversely impacting oocyte yield or quality, thereby facilitating scheduling and reducing delays.

Many patients are utilizing combined hormonal contraception (CHC) at the time of their initial oocyte cryopreservation consultation. In the United States, about 14% of women aged 15-49 were using oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) in 2017-2019. While a short course of CHC exposure is unlikely to be detrimental to oocyte yield, longer-term CHC use may lead to significant suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, gonadotropins, and in turn, follicular development. After only 3 months of CHC use, studies have demonstrated that the pituitary response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone is blunted. If hypothalamic-pituitary suppression from CHC prevents progression of follicle development to the antral stage, prolonged use may also lower the number of follicles susceptible to exogenous gonadotropin stimulation for oocyte collection and therefore total oocyte yield. Patients may require additional cycles and incur additional expense to achieve the desired number of cryopreserved oocytes.

It has been well demonstrated that markers of ORT, specifically, antral follicle count (AFC) and Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) are good predictors of oocyte yield. Existing evidence suggests that CHC use can suppress and diminish these measures of ovarian reserve by 20-30% via suppression of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). One study found that that long-term CHC user could increase AMH by 53% and AFC by 41%, with values returning to normal within 2 months and a plateau effect thereafter. Similarly, another study found after stopping long-term CHC use for 2 months, there was an average increase in AFC of 4.

Overall, existing literature regarding the association between hormonal contraceptive use and AMH concentration has historically been inconsistent but more recent data with large sample sizes, including a systematic review, concluded that AMH levels in women using CHC more than 6 months appears to markedly decline with recovery after discontinuation. Reproductive-age women with lower AMH percentiles at baseline may experience a greater suppressive effect from prolonged CHC use, while it is speculated that those with higher AMH percentiles at baseline may experience a lesser suppressive effect.

There are abundant observational data suggesting long-term CHC use is associated with reversable suppression of ovarian reserve markers, with biologic plausibility that this in turn may mask the "true biological potential" of the ovaries and possibly result in suboptimal oocyte yield. However, to date there are no published adequately powered prospective randomized data evaluating whether a contraceptive pause would lead to improved outcomes. Such practices may already be taking place in ART centers. The simple act of waiting for the potential of more oocytes takes on an obvious, low-risk appeal. Therefore, the investigators propose this assessor-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing a 2-month contraceptive pause to immediate oocyte cryopreservation, with oocyte yield as the primary outcome.

Interventions

  • Other OCP pause
    Subjects in the study arm will be asked to discontinue combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) for 2 months prior to planned oocyte cryopreservation

Primary outcome measures

  • Oocyte maturation rate [Time frame: During oocyte retrieval]
  • Number of oocytes retrieved [Time frame: During oocyte retrieval]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • AMH levels [Time frame: AMH level differences from baseline to post-drug holiday (2 months)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Ovary-bearing individuals 18 to 40 years of age.
  • BMI < 40 kg/m2
  • Non-smoker for at least 3 months prior to study enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

  • BMI greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2
  • Current Smoker
  • Any contraindications to ovarian stimulation or outpatient egg retrieval under anesthesia

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 3 centers
  • Yale Fertility Center — Orange
  • Shady Grove Fertility Rockville — Rockville
  • Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York — New York

Publications

  • Cohen BL, Katz M. Further studies on pituitary and ovarian function in women receiving hormonal contraception. Contraception. 1981 Aug;24(2):159-72. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(81)90089-5. PMID 6794980
  • Wan LS, Ganguly M, Weiss G. Pituitary response to LHRH stimulation in women on oral contraceptives: a followup dose response study. Contraception. 1981 Sep;24(3):229-34. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(81)90035-4. PMID 6796328
  • Yu Ng EH, Chi Wai Chan C, Tang OS, Shu Biu Yeung W, Chung Ho P. Effect of pituitary downregulation on antral follicle count, ovarian volume and stromal blood flow measured by three-dimensional ultrasound with power Doppler prior to ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod. 2004 Dec;19(12):2811-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh500. Epub 2004 Sep 9. PMID 15358718
  • Tran ND, Aghajanova L, Kao CN, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. Impact of pituitary suppression on antral follicle count and oocyte recovery after ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2016 Mar;105(3):690-696. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.033. Epub 2015 Dec 13. PMID 26696299
  • Cohen BL, Katz M. Pituitary and ovarian function in women receiving hormonal contraception. Contraception. 1979 Nov;20(5):475-87. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(79)90053-2. PMID 393456
  • Daniels K, Abma JC. Current Contraceptive Status Among Women Aged 15-49: United States, 2017-2019. NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Oct;(388):1-8. PMID 33151146
  • Schattman GL. Cryopreservation of Oocytes. Author replies. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 21;374(3):288. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1515128. No abstract available. PMID 26789885
  • Doyle JO, Richter KS, Lim J, Stillman RJ, Graham JR, Tucker MJ. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval. Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):459-66.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 PMID 26604065

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07225660 · Pro00090115

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗