Menu
Recruiting NCT07223749

Validation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Algorithm

Observational COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). Basic parameters: from 40 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Validation of a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Predictive Algorithm

Overview

Under-diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is prevalent, with an estimated 75% of adults suffering from COPD in the US, without clinical recognition. Often, the first diagnosis of COPD comes with a flare or exacerbation. In one study, 34% of patients were first diagnosed during hospitalization for an exacerbation, an event associated with a 1-year mortality rate of 26%. When COPD is finally diagnosed, it is often in the late stages, with an average lung function of 50% of normal. Conversely, COPD can be over-diagnosed, defined as symptoms in an individual without airflow obstruction. Over-diagnosed people have significantly higher rates of hospitalization, ER visits, and ambulatory care visits because individuals are treated for a disorder they don't have and are not being treated for the disorder they do have. Lack of diagnostic clarity places patients at risk of medication complications without potential benefit. Conversely, failure to diagnose preempts the benefits of therapy. To date, no reliable solution has been found to address this problem.

Detailed description

Guideline based therapy for COPD includes bronchodilators in conjunction with smoking cessation, vaccination and pulmonary rehabilitation. Bronchodilators have repeatedly been shown to improve symptoms, lung function and quality of life and to reduce exacerbations and possibly mortality in individuals with documented COPD. Despite these findings, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends against screening for COPD because its value has not been demonstrated in "asymptomatic" individuals. Symptoms such as cough, dyspnea, and wheezing are nonspecific and are common in other disorders such as asthma, kidney failure, and heart disease. Furthermore, COPD is an indolent disease, allowing accommodation to the slowly progressive symptoms. To address this significant under-diagnosis problem, the Global Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Committee recommends "targeted case finding" for patients at risk. Smoking is a risk factor for COPD; however, a quarter of COPD patients are never smokers. The GOLD Guidelines suggest two assessment tools, these tools are designed to detect early symptomatic disease with physician administered patient questionnaires, limiting their use for automated, widespread screening.

Risk stratification tools relying entirely on existing, structured Electronic Health Record (EHR) data would provide an opportunity for screening interventions. The most efficient EHR tool would not include symptoms as a predictor variable since the documentation of symptoms are inconsistent and are typically recorded in unstructured text. Automated screening facilitates targeted screening of high-risk patients, including those individuals with limited contact with the health system. This study has created an accurate tool for this purpose that was cross-validated on a potentially biased set of patients who already underwent spirometric testing.

Primary outcome measures

  • obtainment of the accuracy of a model for predicting the presence of obstruction on spirometry [Time frame: minute 10]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • greater thank or equal to 40 years of age
  • 2 or more encounters in the health system
  • Previous Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) recorded in our Electronic Health Records (EHR) in the previous 5 years

Exclusion criteria

  • cystic fibrosis
  • Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency (AAD)currently pregnant
  • History of a lung transplant or partial removal of the lung
  • significant chest wall deformity
  • neuromuscular disease that currently impacts the respiratory muscles
  • surgery requiring general anesthesia or an overnight stay in the hospital within the past 30 days

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Case-only

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences — Winston-Salem

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07223749 · IRB00121215

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗