A Superiority Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation for Low Back Pain
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Lumbar radiofrequency ablation with conventional electrodes (LRFA-C), Lumbar radiofrequency ablation with multi-tined electrodes (LRFA-M), Simulated lumbar radiofrequency ablation.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP). Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
ASTRAL: A Superiority Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation for Low Back Pain
Overview
The purpose of the ASTRAL Study is to evaluate the effectiveness of LRFA (Lumbar radiofrequency ablation) against a control procedure. The ASTRAL Study will enroll individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and randomly assign them to one of three groups: lumbar radiofrequency ablation using conventional electrodes placed parallel to the medial branch nerves (LRFA-C), lumbar radiofrequency ablation using multi-tined electrodes placed perpendicular to the medial branch nerves (LRFA-M), or a simulated radiofrequency ablation procedure.
Detailed description
Low back pain is the #1 contributor to years lived with disability in the United States. Lumbar radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) is a minimally invasive procedure for chronic low back pain (CLBP) commonly used in the US, but the effectiveness of this procedure has yet to be fully explored, and a definitive, double-blind, multicenter RCT demonstrating a clinically relevant benefit of LRFA over a control procedure has yet to be conducted. LRFA-C involves placing a conventional radiofrequency electrode parallel to each targeted medial branch nerve, administering local anesthetic, and confirming placement with nerve stimulation as per standard clinical practice. LRFA-M follows the same processes as LRFA-C, albeit a multi-tined radiofrequency electrode will be used to create larger lesions, and the electrode will be positioned perpendicular to the medial branch nerve. The primary objectives of ASTRAL are to 1) compare the effectiveness of LRFA-C with a simulated LRFA control procedure for improving back-related functional limitations, and 2) compare the effectiveness of LRFA-M with a simulated LRFA control procedure for improving back-related functional limitations. The ASTRAL Study also aims to explore the difference in effectiveness, procedure duration, radiation dosage, and pain intensity between LRFA-C and LRFA-M.
Interventions
- Procedure Lumbar radiofrequency ablation with conventional electrodes (LRFA-C)
LRFA-C positions a conventional thermal radiofrequency electrode at each medial branch nerve to be ablated and administers local anesthetic to the nerve. Parallel placement of the electrode will be achieved. Once the electrode is in correct position and nerve stimulation testing done, a radiofrequency lesion is generated, achieving a temperature 80°C-90°C, lasting 90-120 seconds. If a 16-gauge or larger electrode is used, no second lesion needs to be made. If an 18-gauge electrode is used, the e - Procedure Lumbar radiofrequency ablation with multi-tined electrodes (LRFA-M)
LRFA-M positions a multi-tined thermal radiofrequency electrode at each medial branch nerve to be ablated and administers local anesthetic to the nerve. However, the multi-tined thermal radiofrequency electrode is thought to achieve larger lesions and thus does not require parallel electrode placement; the LRFA-M electrode will be placed perpendicular to the medial branch nerve. All subsequent processes are the same as for LRFA-C. This includes local corticosteroid injection at each ablation sit - Procedure Simulated lumbar radiofrequency ablation
The simulated LRFA control procedure will be performed in an identical fashion to LRFA-M, except 1) after electrode positioning, a neurodestructive lesion will not be made; and 2) a pre-recorded audio recording of the procedure will be played (out of view of the patient, immediately adjacent to the RFA machine) in order to simulate the beeping and other sounds of the machine and to ensure the appropriate length of the simulated procedure. The electrode will remain in place for the 90-120 seconds
Primary outcome measures
- Back-related functional limitations [Time frame: 3 months post-randomization]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
- Back-related functional limitations [Time frame: 1 month post-randomization]
- Back-related functional limitations [Time frame: 6 months post-randomization]
- Back-related functional limitations [Time frame: 12 months post-randomization]
- Procedure duration [Time frame: Day of intervention, after procedure]
- Radiation dose [Time frame: Day of intervention, after procedure]
- Participant pain during the procedure [Time frame: Day of intervention, after procedure]
- Pain intensity [Time frame: 3 months post-randomization]
- Pain intensity [Time frame: 1 month post-randomization]
- Pain intensity [Time frame: 6 months post-randomization]
- Pain intensity [Time frame: 12 months post-randomization]
- Pain interference [Time frame: 3 months post-randomization]
- Pain interference [Time frame: 1 month post-randomization]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age ≥18 years
- CLBP of duration ≥ 3 months. Low back pain is defined as occurring between the lower posterior margin of the rib cage and the horizontal gluteal fold.
- Low back pain intensity numerical rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 with one of the following prior to LRFA: 1) Current low back pain intensity, 2) Average pain over past 7 days, OR 3) Pain intensity without specification of recall period
- Has had conservative treatments for CLBP (physical therapy, exercise therapy, spinal manipulation, massage, acupuncture, etc.)
- Candidate for unilateral LRFA (L1-S1 joints; ≤3 levels); or bilateral LRFA (L1-S1 joints; ≤2 levels)
- 'Positive responses' (≥80% improvement of CLBP pain intensity) to 2 sets of anesthetic-only MBBs (≤0.5cc of local anesthetic)
- Able to read, speak, and understand English sufficient for informed consent purposes
- Stated willingness to comply with all study processes and availability for the duration of the study, and provision of a signed and dated informed consent form
Exclusion criteria
- CLBP attributed primarily to specific spine-related conditions (radiculopathy, lumbar spinal stenosis, spinal instability), 'red flag' conditions (infection / malignancy / fracture), and/or inflammatory arthritis (RA, SpA, etc.)
- Prior LRFA
- Prior lumbar facet joint (intra-articular or medial branch nerve) corticosteroid injections (past 6 months)
- Surgery involving one or more of spinal levels where LRFA is to be performed, in the past 2 years
- Lumbar fusion involving the spinal levels where LRFA is considered, at any time
- Prior known severe lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI as defined by Lee (2011): obliteration of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and marked compression of dural sac, and none of the cauda equina can be visually separated from each other. No new MRIs would be done specifically as part of the study processes.
- Prior formal diagnosis of fibromyalgia by a rheumatologist (diagnosis by primary care physician or pain medicine specialist is not sufficient)
- Unstable psychiatric or terminal medical conditions that would limit study participation and the likelihood of follow-up for 12 months post-randomization
- Pregnancy, being a prisoner, or having a prior formal diagnosis of cognitive impairment by a neuropsychologist or neurologist, confirmed by health record documentation
- Participant report of prior formal diagnosis of cognitive impairment by a neuropsychologist or neurologist can be obtained, but participant-reported cognitive impairment by a neuropsychologist or neurologist must be confirmed via health record documentation. No new evaluations for cognitive impairment would be done specifically as part of the study processes.
- Contraindication to local anesthetic, corticosteroid, or any aspects of LRFA
- Cannot reach MBB targets with 11.9cm needle
- Major planned life events over the next 4 months that might interfere with study participation (e.g., major abdominal or chest surgery or extended vacation)
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
United States · 3 centers
- Emory Musculoskeletal Institute — Atlanta
- Cleveland Clinic — Cleveland
- University of Utah Orthopaedic Center/PM&R — Salt Lake City
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07222462 · Pro00075903 · U01AR084723