Safe & Sound Protocol in Adults With Trauma and SUD
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Safe and Sound Protocol.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Substance Use Disorders, Posttraumatic Stress Symptom, Anxiety. Basic parameters: 18 years — 75 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
The Effect of the Safe and Sound Protocol on Emotional Regulation in Traumatized Adults With Substance Use Disorders
Overview
This study will explore whether the use of the Safe and Sound Protocol (SSP) app is an effective adjunct to treatment as usual (TAU) in individuals with co-occurring substance use disorders and trauma. This study will recruit 129 participants (100 completers) randomized to receive either active or sham SSP in addition to TAU. Participants will utilize the SSP for a minimum of three hours to a maximum of five hours for a total of seven days. Data will be collected at both pre- and post-test. Data to be collected will include measures on affect, anxiety, personality, mindfulness, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. The SSP has shown effectiveness in reducing symptoms of anxiety, depression, and trauma symptoms in pilot studies conducted at other locations. This will be the first study to examine the effectiveness of SSP with individuals with co-occurring SUD and trauma.
Detailed description
The Safe and Sound Protocol (SSP) was developed by Dr. Stephen Porges based on his Polyvagal Theory that highlights the vagus nerve's influences on emotional and behavioral regulation, social connection, and fear/trauma responses.
Research examining the effectiveness of SSP with children and/or adults on the Autism Spectrum has shown improvement in social awareness and decline in auditory hypersensitivities and hypo-sensitivities, visual sensitivity, tactile hypersensitivities, selective eating and digestive problems. SSP has also been shown to reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression and autonomic reactivity in individuals engaged in speech therapy for voice and throat complaints.
There is on-going clinical research to examine the effectiveness of SSP in various populations, including those suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In real-world data obtain through the SSP platform, just over half of individuals reporting clinical levels of PTSD symptoms as assessed on the Posttraumatic Checklist - 5 (PCL-5) had a reduction in symptoms to below the clinical threshold following the completion of SSP.
Safe and Sound Protocol (SSP) Core is five hours of music therapy that is progressively filtered through a patented algorithm that highlights middle sound frequencies, the frequency most associated with cues of safety from human speech. This is designed to stimulate the vagus nerve by engaging the middle ear muscles and nerves to move out of defensive state of activation and activate the social engagement and calming system of the nervous system. SSP is designed to help participants regulate their nervous system to support reduction in distress and increased social connection.
To date, there is no research underway to examine the effectiveness of SSP for individuals experiencing posttraumatic stress symptoms and a substance use disorder (SUD). Individuals experiencing posttraumatic stress symptoms and SUD are hypothesized to benefit from a non-invasive treatment designed to regulate their autonomic nervous system, such as SSP.
Interventions
- Device Safe and Sound Protocol
Participants will complete a series of instruments after consenting to participate and have the SSP uploaded onto their mobile device or tablet. Participants will listen to the SSP for 3 to 5 hours over the course of 7 days. On the eighth day, participants will complete a follow-up set of instruments. The active arm will deliver the actual SSP intervention whereas the sham arm will deliver unfiltered music.
Primary outcome measures
- Difference in posttraumatic stress symptom scores pre-post between groups as measured by the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). [Time frame: Day 1 and Day 8]
- Difference in anxiety symptom scores pre-post between groups as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. [Time frame: Day 1 and Day 8]
- Difference in autonomic arousal symptom scores pre-post between groups as measured by the Body Perception Questionnaire Autonomic Symptoms - short form (BPQ-20 ANS). [Time frame: Day 1 and Day 8]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
- Differences in positive and negative affect scores pre-post between groups as measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). [Time frame: Day 1 and Day 8]
- Changes in mindfulness scores pre-post between groups as measured by the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale - Revised (CAMS-R) [Time frame: Day 1 and Day 8]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Ages 18 years old to 75 years old
- In residential treatment for substance use disorder.
- Has a history of trauma and is enrolled in Caron's trauma programming
- Is proficient in English
- Able to provide written informed consent.
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.
Exclusion criteria
- Does not speak English
- Age < 18 or > 75
- Does not have a history of trauma
- Active psychosis
- Active or uncontrolled seizures
- Tinnitus
- Active suicidal ideation
- Actively engaging in self-injurious behavior
- Severe neurological condition
- Diagnosis of autism
- Has any serious medical disease or mental health condition which, in the judgment of the Principal Investigator or his/her designee, would make study participation unsafe, or would make intervention compliance difficult.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- Caron Treatment Centers — Wernersville
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07219056 · Caron002