Menu
Recruiting NCT07218133

Trans-Auricular Stimulation for Postoperative Inflammation in Spine Surgery

No phase Interventional Spinal Fusion Hyperglycemia Postoperative Pain Management Postoperative Care

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Auricular vagus nerve stimulation, Sham Auricular Vagus nerve Stimulation.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Spinal Fusion, Hyperglycemia, Postoperative Pain Management, Postoperative Care. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

This study is a randomized controlled trial that will evaluate the effect of non-invasive auricular vagal nerve stimulation on inflammatory markers, glycemic control, postoperative pain, and inflammation-related clinical outcomes after long-segment spinal fusion surgeries when compared to current accepted management.

Detailed description

Long-segment spinal fusions are effective interventions to relieve pain, neurological compromise, or disability related to a variety of causes of advanced spinal degeneration or spinal deformity. Despite advancements in minimally invasive spine surgery, revision of prior instrumentation, correction of coronal or sagittal imbalance, bony decompression, and multilevel arthrodesis often must be performed via open surgery. While these procedures can produce excellent results with regards to postoperative alignment, neural decompression, and functional improvement, they are long and invasive cases requiring large incisions and extensive soft tissue dissection and osseous manipulation. As such, postoperative adverse events or complications are common (e.g., DVT/PE, wound healing problems, infection, nerve stretch injury, etc.). These patients almost universally experience significant postoperative pain, require postoperative rehabilitation, and are at high-risk for hospital readmissions. Moreover, the sterile trauma from long-segment spinal surgeries is a tremendous systemic inflammatory stimulus that yields downstream sequelae such as hyperglycemia, elevated inflammatory markers (e.g. cytokines), signs of microvascular ischemia, and other stress-related outcomes. Attempts to control this inflammation and reduce the adverse effects of these surgeries are lacking, particularly with respect to non-pharmacologic options.

Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is a promising emerging modality by which the body's systemic inflammatory response may be attenuated. Importantly, VNS may be successfully applied via noninvasive auricular stimulation. This technique has been trialed as non-pharmacologic pain control adjunct after multiple types of surgeries or painful medical events, but none as traumatic as long-segment spinal fusion. It also has been shown to yield substantial anti-inflammatory effects in numerous animal models. Furthermore, auricular VNS has been extensively studied at Washington University School of Medicine in multiple neurological conditions, including aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke, and intraparenchymal hemorrhage. The use of noninvasive VNS devices has been shown to be an intervention that is safely administered and does not cause undue distress to patients. Given these promising aspects of VNS, Washington University's particular interest in this treatment modality, and the unmet postoperative care needs for long-segment spinal fusion patients, the investigators propose prospectively studying the effects of auricular VNS in a population of patients at Barnes-Jewish Hospital who have undergone long-segment fusion surgeries. The investigators hypothesize that perioperative VNS will mitigate the systemic inflammatory reaction in these patients as demonstrated by reduced inflammatory markers (both direct and indirect) and improved inflammatory-mediated clinical outcomes.

This study will be a randomized controlled trial assessing differences between accepted perioperative care plus auricular VNS (the intervention) as compared to accepted perioperative care plus a sham stimulus. The VNS device will be a noninvasive stimulator applied to the left ear to stimulate the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. All patients will be fitted with the device, and the sham stimulus will not receive the required therapeutic stimulation through the device. Patients will receive stimulation twice on the day of surgery followed by twice daily during the duration of their postoperative hospital admission. Relevant inflammatory cytokines, laboratory tests, pain scores, clinical outcomes, and imaging studies will be obtained for each patient. Post-hospital disposition, delayed adverse outcomes, and hospital readmissions will also be tracked after discharge.

Interventions

  • Device Auricular vagus nerve stimulation
    Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation
  • Device Sham Auricular Vagus nerve Stimulation
    Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulator applied without utilizing stimulating current.

Primary outcome measures

  • Inflammatory cytokine levels [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Pain scores [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]
  • blood glucose levels [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]
  • Postoperative adverse events/complications [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]
  • Secondary markers of inflammation [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]
  • Post-hospitalization disposition [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]
  • Heart rate [Time frame: Time Frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]
  • Opioid usage [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]
  • Insulin requirements [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]
  • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]
  • D-dimer levels [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]]
  • Hospital admission length [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]
  • Blood pressure [Time frame: 5-10 days (depending on hospital admission length)]]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Long-segment spinal fusions (defined as constructs spanning at least L2-pelvis for thoracolumbar fusions or C2-T2 for cervical fusions)
  • Ability to undergo a reliable neurologic examination and pain assessments

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients <18 years of age
  • Shorter-segment spinal fusions than those described above
  • Undergoing current active cancer therapy
  • Undergoing treatment with immunosuppressive drugs
  • Additional spinal surgery within past 6 months
  • Sustained bradycardia or presence of pacemaker
  • History of substance abuse

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Washington University School of Medicine — St Louis

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07218133 · 202407057SpineVNS

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗