Virtual Reality Viewing of Unaltered Streetscape Versus Digitally Manipulated Opposite Streetscape to Assess Psychosocial Response in Participants
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Survey Administration, Virtual Technology Intervention, Virtual Technology Intervention, Virtual Technology Intervention.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Psychiatric Disorder. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Piloting a Virtual Reality-Based, Randomized Controlled Trial of Psychosocial Responses to Neighborhood Physical Disorder
Overview
This clinical trial compares virtual reality viewing of an unaltered streetscape versus a digitally manipulated opposite streetscape to assess the psychosocial response in participants. Visible measures of neighborhood factors might be associated with health outcomes and risk factors of those outcomes. Short-term exposure to virtual reality environments representing very high or very low levels of neighborhood physical disorder - presence or absence of garbage/litter, presence or absence of graffiti, presence or absence of an abandoned building, presence or absence of large dumpsters, poor or very well-kept building conditions, poor or very well-kept yard conditions, poor or very well-kept road verge conditions may be a safe and effective way to assess psychosocial response in participants.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Compare sympathetic autonomic measures (heart rate variability and skin conductance) between participants viewing, in virtual reality, their streetscape as a digitally manipulated opposite version with respect to physical disorder indicators versus participants viewing their streetscape as a digital twin with respect to physical disorder indicators.
II. Compare self-report measures (Self-Assessment Manikin and state anxiety ratings) between participants viewing, in virtual reality, their streetscape as a digitally manipulated opposite version with respect to physical disorder indicators versus participants viewing their streetscape as a digital twin with respect to physical disorder indicators.
III. Record side effects of interacting within a virtual reality environment over short periods of time (3-5 min):
IIIa. Quantify frequency of side effects; IIIb. Explore whether side effects increase across subsequent VR sessions of the cross-over study; IIIc. Explore whether side effects vary by VR intervention arm (digital twin of own streetscape or digitally manipulated opposite indicators of physical disorder of own streetscape).
IV. Analyze impact of covariates on study outcomes.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. Compare eye gaze density between participants viewing, in virtual reality, their streetscape as a digitally manipulated opposite version with respect to physical disorder indicators versus participants viewing their streetscape as a digital twin with respect to physical disorder indicators.
II. Compare self-report measures (neighborhood social cohesion and neighborhood disorder) between participants viewing, in virtual reality, their streetscape as a digitally manipulated opposite version with respect to physical disorder indicators versus participants viewing their streetscape as a digital twin with respect to physical disorder indicators.
OUTLINE: Participants are randomized within their residing neighborhood to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Participants have their streetscape photographed. Participants view a standard residential streetscape using virtual reality (VR) for up to 5 minutes. Patients then view a digital twin of their streetscape with identical physical disorder using VR for up to 5 minutes followed by viewing their streetscape with the opposite physical disorder using VR for up to 5 minutes.
ARM II: Participants have their streetscape photographed. Participants view a standard residential streetscape using VR for up to 5 minutes. Patients then view their streetscape with the opposite physical disorder using VR for up to 5 minutes followed by viewing a digital twin of their streetscape with identical physical disorder using VR for up to 5 minutes.
Interventions
- Other Survey Administration
Ancillary studies - Other Virtual Technology Intervention
View standard streetscape - Other Virtual Technology Intervention
View digital twin of streetscape - Other Virtual Technology Intervention
View opposite digital streetscape
Primary outcome measures
- Change in heart rate variability [Time frame: From baseline to completion of virtual reality (VR) viewings, up to 1 day]
- Change in skin conductance [Time frame: From baseline to completion of VR viewings, up to 1 day]
- Affective reaction [Time frame: After completion of VR viewings, up to 1 day]
- Anxiety [Time frame: After completion of VR viewings, up to 1 day]
- Participant reported discomfort [Time frame: After completion of VR viewings, up to 1 day]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Adults 18+
- Must currently live (4+ night/week) at the residence being studied. Only one resident per household will be selected
- Must understand and be able to read English
- Must agree to have residence photographed
- Must be able to wear a VR head mounted display
- Must live in neighborhood that has been selected for study
- Must be willing and able to attend an approximately 2 hour in-person visit on Ohio State University (OSU) campus
Exclusion criteria
- Pregnant women
- Visual or mobility impairment
- Cannot have epilepsy or other condition that would inhibit them from being able to use a VR headset
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center — Columbus
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07216534 · OSU-25170 · NCI-2025-07331