Menu
Recruiting NCT07213986

Vibrant Capsule for Spinal Cord Injury Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction

No phase Interventional Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Spinal Cord Injury

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Vibrant Capsule.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction, Spinal Cord Injury. Basic parameters: from 21 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Pilot Trial of the Vibrant Capsule for Spinal Cord Injury Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction

Overview

The goal of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of Vibrant capsules in spinal cord injury patients with neurogenic bowel.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to see how well the Vibrant capsule works at treating people with spinal cord injury (SCI)-induced upper motor neuron (UMN) neurogenic bowel. This study will test the safety of the Vibrant capsule. This Vibrant capsule has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for chronic idiopathic constipation.

Interventions

  • Device Vibrant Capsule
    The Vibrant capsule is designed to alleviate chronic constipation by stimulating the colon through gentle vibrations. The Vibrant capsule will be swallowed and tracked through the digestive system of spinal cord injury patients.

Primary outcome measures

  • Safety of Vibrant capsule as indicated by number of participants who had an adverse event [Time frame: baseline week 1, baseline week 2, baseline week 3, baseline week 4]
  • Safety of Vibrant capsule as indicated by number of participants who had an adverse event [Time frame: week 1 with treatment, week 2 with treatment, week 3 with treatment, week 4 with treatment]
  • Safety of Vibrant capsule as assessed by the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) [Time frame: baseline week 1, baseline week 2, baseline week 3, baseline week 4]
  • Safety of Vibrant capsule as assessed by the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) [Time frame: week 1 with treatment, week 2 with treatment, week 3 with treatment, week 4 with treatment]
  • Safety as assessed by average weekly Numerical Pain Score [Time frame: baseline week 1, baseline week 2, baseline week 3, baseline week 4]
  • Safety as assessed by average weekly Numerical Pain Score [Time frame: week 1 with treatment, week 2 with treatment, week 3 with treatment, week 4 with treatment]
  • Safety as assessed by the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) [Time frame: baseline, week 3]
  • Safety as assessed by the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) [Time frame: week 1 with treatment, week 4 with treatment]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Feasibility as indicated by the number of participants that adhere to the prescribed use of Vibrant [Time frame: from week 1 with treatment to week 4 with treatment]
  • Feasibility of using the Vibrant capsule as indicated by a satisfaction survey [Time frame: end of study (4 weeks after start of treatment)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) of more than one year.
  • Stable neurological level and function of SCI for at least six months.
  • Consistent bowel program without changes for at least 3 months.
  • At least one scheduled bowel movement (BM) every three days.
  • Use of digital stimulation, suppositories, enemas, or mini enemas, as part of the scheduled bowel program.
  • Use of oral medications as part of the bowel program.

Exclusion criteria

  • Bowel incontinence occurring more than once per week.
  • Non-English-speaking individuals.
  • History of bowel obstruction, ileus, diverticulitis, or bowel surgery for a disease (appendix removal is ok).
  • Persistent autonomic dysreflexia (AD) triggered by bowel movements.
  • Recent changes to spasticity medications within the past month.
  • History of significant gastrointestinal disorders
  • History of Zenker's diverticulum
  • Dysphagia
  • Esophageal stricture
  • Eosinophilic esophagitis or achalasia
  • Pregnancy.
  • Presence of implanted devices that could be affected by proximity to a direct current magnetic field.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • TIRR Memorial Hermann — Houston

Publications

  • American College of Gastroenterology Chronic Constipation Task Force. An evidence-based approach to the management of chronic constipation in North America. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100 Suppl 1:S1-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.50613_1.x. No abstract available. PMID 16008640
  • Rao SSC, Lembo A, Chey WD, Friedenberg K, Quigley EMM. Effects of the vibrating capsule on colonic circadian rhythm and bowel symptoms in chronic idiopathic constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Nov;32(11):e13890. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13890. Epub 2020 May 25. PMID 32449277
  • Ron Y, Halpern Z, Safadi R, Dickman R, Dekel R, Sperber AD. Safety and efficacy of the vibrating capsule, an innovative non-pharmacological treatment modality for chronic constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Jan;27(1):99-104. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12485. Epub 2014 Dec 6. PMID 25484196
  • Qi Z, Middleton JW, Malcolm A. Bowel Dysfunction in Spinal Cord Injury. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018 Aug 29;20(10):47. doi: 10.1007/s11894-018-0655-4. PMID 30159690

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07213986 · HSC-MS-25-0364 · Project# 0019646

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗