Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07211724

Methamphetamine Use Disorder Support in Heart Failure Pilot Study

No phase Interventional Heart Failure Methamphetamine Use Disorder

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: MUD Management (contingency management +/- adjunctive MUD pharmacotherapy), HF GDMT management.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Heart Failure, Methamphetamine Use Disorder. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Methamphetamine Use Disorder Support in Heart Failure (Meth HF) Pilot Study

Overview

Heart failure (HF) affects over 6 million people in the US and is a major cause of both hospital admissions and death. HF has many causes and contributing factors. One of the most aggressive forms of HF is associated with methamphetamine abuse, which has become its own epidemic in the US over the past twenty years. People who use methamphetamine tend to develop HF at a much younger age, with more severe disease and more serious consequences. A recent analysis using nationwide data, methamphetamine use doubled the risk of death or hospitalizations compared to non-users in patients with HF. Thus, methamphetamine users with HF represent a very high-risk group of patients from a healthcare perspective. HF may be reversible in some patients who use methamphetamine if patients can achieve 1) abstain from further methamphetamine use and 2) consistently take all the medications that can improve HF. These two goals are very difficult to achieve in practice, as the care of both methamphetamine addiction and HF requires specialized medical expertise and intensive regular follow up of patients. In general, achievement of one goal is not possible without the other. Patients who use methamphetamine have poor adherence to medical follow-up and therapies, and abstinence from methamphetamine is difficult to maintain. This is further complicated because the current model of HF care does not incorporate treatment for methamphetamine use. The current study proposes to launch a multidisciplinary clinic that treats both HF and methamphetamine use disorder at the same time. The HF care will be led by a cardiologist while the methamphetamine use treatment will be led by a psychiatric clinical pharmacist trained in addiction medicine. State-of-the-art HF care will include optimization of four pillar HF medications. Methamphetamine use treatment will include counseling and incentivized abstinence known as contingency management (CM). The investigators will manage the patients in the clinic for 6 months total. The investigators are interested in demonstrating that this integrated clinic model will result in improved delivery of care for these patients by reporting the rates of successful abstinence from methamphetamine, improved optimization of the four HF medications, and enhanced patient reported quality of life over the 6 months of follow up. The investigators will also collect data on the costs associated with providing this level of care and estimate a range of potential cost-savings.

Detailed description

Prospective, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a multidisciplinary HF clinic which integrates MUD management along with standard-of-care guideline directed HF management. The MUD treatment plan will be pragmatic, consisting of behavioral counseling, CM with or without pharmacotherapy (see below). Patients with HF and concomitant active meth use will be enrolled consecutively and managed in the clinic for 6 months. The pragmatic approach to MUD treatment will allow for individualization of therapy plans reflecting current MUD guidelines. The overarching objective of the current proposal is to demonstrate the feasibility and preliminary value of a HF clinic for meth users that integrates MUD treatment. The central hypothesis is that incorporation of simultaneous meth use abstinence incentives and aid with HF management in a singular clinic visit model will improve care delivery metrics associated with improved HF outcomes. The hypothesis aligns with HF guidelines that emphasize the essential role of incorporating comorbidity management into routine care of patients with HF.

Specific Aim 1 will define the rate of successful abstinence from meth with implementation of a multidisciplinary meth HF clinic utilizing contingency +/- pharmacologic management strategies alongside standard HF care in a prospective, open-label pragmatic study. Patients with HF and documented meth use will be consecutively enrolled for follow-up in the study clinic. Along with standard-of-care management of HF, patients will work with the addiction medicine pharmacist to receive an individualized MUD treatment plan for 6 months. Implementation of an effective MUD treatment plan will result in both improved abstinence from meth, as well as adherence to clinic visits and HF therapies over the 6 months of follow-up, establishing the feasibility and model for this multidisciplinary integrated clinic.

Specific Aim 2 will assess the clinical value of the meth HF clinic to improve HF care quality metrics. As a pilot study, patient adherence to HF GDMT and follow-up appointments will be descriptively quantified, along with achievement of GDMT target doses at 1, 3, and 6 months. Changes in patient quality of life from baseline will be ascertained utilizing the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). Since MUD represents an established barrier to patient adherence with medical therapies, the integration of MUD with HF care will improve these HF care quality metrics associated with improved patient outcomes in HF. These data will demonstrate the preliminary value for this multidisciplinary integrated clinic.

Specific Aim 3 will enumerate the healthcare resources and costs required for implementation, and further attempt to estimate the range of cost savings associated with the meth HF clinic. To demonstrate feasibility and replicability, the costs associated with this care model will be estimated through prospective collection of care delivery data across all study patients, including personnel time and other direct costs of the MUD treatment. Cost savings will be estimated based on projected reductions in health resource use (e.g., reduced out- and inpatient encounters). The cost and savings components will be the foundation for designing both a payer-perspective budget impact analysis, and a societal-perspective full cost-effectiveness analysis for incorporation into a future randomized, controlled study of the clinical and economic impacts of the clinic.

The study will establish the feasibility and preliminary value of an innovative model of care delivery for very high-risk patients with HF and MUD that reduces barriers to optimizing the care and benefit. The broader impact will be established by demonstrating that increased meth abstinence improves adherence and GDMT optimization, underscoring the value of systems that provide a holistic patient-centric approach to HF management. Specifically, the achievement of many of the guideline-recommended HF clinical performance and quality measures can be enhanced by incorporating SUD treatment into the standard of care for HF.

Interventions

  • Other MUD Management (contingency management +/- adjunctive MUD pharmacotherapy)
    Management of MUD will be individualized for each study patient. All patients will receive behavioral counseling utilizing motivational interviewing and education and offered a contingency management (CM) plan incentivizing abstinence from meth. Several pharmacotherapies are recommended for the treatment of MUD: mirtazapine, bupropion and naltrexone, or bupropion monotherapy. If required, adjunctive MUD pharmacotherapy will be added to the CM guided by comorbid conditions, patient characteristic
  • Other HF GDMT management
    As per standard clinical care, patients will be followed by a cardiologist for HF management including assessment for GDMT optimization.

Primary outcome measures

  • Abstinence from Methamphetamine [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 months]
  • GDMT optimization - drug class prescribing [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 months]
  • GDMT optimization - dosing [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 months]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • BSCS score changes over time [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 months]
  • KCCQ-12 score changes over time [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Heart failure diagnosis meeting universal definition criteria with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%
  • Active methamphetamine use and stated desire to cease (confirmed by patient self-reported history of active use and /or positive urine toxicology obtained as part of routine patient care); physician verifying patients meets criteria for MUD.
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Empaneled to LA General Medical Center/DHS
  • Able to provide informed consent (translated consent forms will be used for non-English speakers)

Exclusion criteria

  • Polysubstance use (excluding tobacco and marijuana)
  • Documented history of alcohol use disorder (DSM-5) or alcohol dependence (ICD-11). Intermittent alcohol use below these thresholds (e.g. social use) is not an exclusion.
  • Cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support at time of presentation
  • Acute coronary syndrome, acute pulmonary embolism, or hemodynamically significant arrhythmia on admission
  • Pregnancy
  • Acute psychiatric condition requiring immediate treatment or significantly impairing their ability to provide informed consent or participate in study procedures

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Health services research

Study locations

United States · 2 centers
  • Los Angeles General Medical Center — Los Angeles
  • University of Southern California, Alfred E. Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sc — Los Angeles

Publications

  • Bozkurt B, Coats AJS, Tsutsui H, Abdelhamid CM, Adamopoulos S, Albert N, Anker SD, Atherton J, Bohm M, Butler J, Drazner MH, Michael Felker G, Filippatos G, Fiuzat M, Fonarow GC, Gomez-Mesa JE, Heidenreich P, Imamura T, Jankowska EA, Januzzi J, Khazanie P, Kinugawa K, Lam CSP, Matsue Y, Metra M, Ohtani T, Francesco Piepoli M, Ponikowski P, Rosano GMC, Sakata Y, Seferovic P, Starling RC, Teerlink J PMID 33605000
  • Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, Deswal A, Drazner MH, Dunlay SM, Evers LR, Fang JC, Fedson SE, Fonarow GC, Hayek SS, Hernandez AF, Khazanie P, Kittleson MM, Lee CS, Link MS, Milano CA, Nnacheta LC, Sandhu AT, Stevenson LW, Vardeny O, Vest AR, Yancy CW; ACC/AHA Joint Committee Members. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of t PMID 35363499
  • Wu JR, Moser DK. Medication Adherence Mediates the Relationship Between Heart Failure Symptoms and Cardiac Event-Free Survival in Patients With Heart Failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):40-46. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000427. PMID 28591004
  • Gandhi S, Mosleh W, Sharma UC, Demers C, Farkouh ME, Schwalm JD. Multidisciplinary Heart Failure Clinics Are Associated With Lower Heart Failure Hospitalization and Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2017 Oct;33(10):1237-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 24. PMID 28807523
  • Douglass AR, Maister A, Moeller KE, Salwan A, Vallabh A, Waters K, Payne GH. Exploring the harm reduction paradigm: the role of Board-Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists. Ment Health Clin. 2024 Aug 2;14(4):253-266. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2024.08.253. eCollection 2024 Aug. PMID 39104432
  • Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) Members; ASAM Team; AAAP Team; IRETA Team. The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder. J Addict Med. 2024 May-Jun 01;18(1S Suppl 1):1-56. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001299. PMID 38669101
  • Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, Greenwell L, Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2006 Nov;101(11):1546-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01581.x. PMID 17034434
  • Reddy PKV, Ng TMH, Oh EE, Moady G, Elkayam U. Clinical Characteristics and Management of Methamphetamine-Associated Cardiomyopathy: State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 2;9(11):e016704. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016704. Epub 2020 May 29. PMID 32468897

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07211724 · HS-25-00064

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗