Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07210424

Comparative Study on the Post-operative Pain and Other Outcomes of Mesh Fixation With Prolene vs Vicryl vs Skin Staples in Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Observational Inguinal Hernia

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Mesh Fixation.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Inguinal Hernia. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

We are going to see the outcome measures for patient and compare them across two groups, those who are undergoing mesh fixation for inguinal hernia by sutures, and those who are fixated by skin staples.

Interventions

  • Procedure Mesh Fixation
    Mesh fixation during Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Primary outcome measures

  • Post Operative Pain [Time frame: At 3, 7, 14 and 30 post op day]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair
  • 18-65 years
  • Both genders

Exclusion criteria

  • COPD
  • Immunocompromised
  • Obstructive Uropathy
  • Chronic constipation

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07210424 · 511/RC/KEMU

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗