Menu
Recruiting NCT07205588

Assessment of Dental Pathologies Using Digital Tools

Observational Dental Caries (Diagnosis) Dental Plaque (Diagnosis) Periodontitis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Dental Caries (Diagnosis), Dental Plaque (Diagnosis), Periodontitis. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France, Reunion
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

RESTODATA-NUM: A Multicenter Observational Study on the Assessment of Dental Pathologies Using Digital Tools in Adults

Overview

Digital technology is playing an increasingly important role in dentistry, because of its ability to support the practitioner and increase work efficiency. Among digital tools, orthopantomogram (OPT or panoramic) radiography is currently the most widely used. It provides a global view of the jaws, highlighting internal structures in 2D. As in other fields, scientific advances have made it possible to go beyond the limited representation of two planes of space and obtain 3D images. The intraoral scanner (IOS) or "optical impression camera" appeared in the mid-80s. They use light to create a digital optical impression that reproduces the surface of external anatomical structures in 3D images. It improves dental practice, making impressions less uncomfortable for patients, saving clinical time, facilitating storage and archiving, and facilitating transmission to the prosthetist where appropriate. This type of device is already well established in dental practices. More recently, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has also begun to develop. This 3D sectional imaging technique adds an extra dimension to the exploration of internal structures. Imaging examinations provide additional information to that obtained from the visual clinical oral examination. Together, they help the practitioner to establish the diagnosis and treatment plan. Currently, visual information has to be collected manually. Collecting this data represents a significant amount of information. Its quality and completeness are crucial to the success of the treatment. Given the high volume of consultations, and practitioners' need to optimize their time, it would be interesting to assess whether optical impressions, at least in part, could help to acquire this clinical data more systematically and more rapidly, in order to improve patient management. Similarly, Cone Beam CT (CBCT), with its 3D data, improves the accuracy of diagnostic information. It would also be interesting to assess the real added value of this examination. The RESTODATA-NUM study follows on from the RESTODATA study, the results of which provided recent information on the oral status of adult patients, and their care needs. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of a standard real-life examination by the practitioner combining clinical and radiographic examinations (referred to here as practitioner-on-patient detection) on the one hand, and an examination based on imaging results obtained using digital tools on the other, in terms of detecting dental condition in a sample of adult patients consulting for an oral examination at one of the participating centers.

Detailed description

Digital technology is playing an increasingly important role in dentistry due to its ability to assist practitioners and enhance work efficiency.

Among digital tools, panoramic radiography (orthopantomogram) is currently the most widely used. It provides a comprehensive image of the jaws, highlighting internal structures in 2D. As in other fields, scientific advances have made it possible to go beyond two-dimensional representations and obtain 3D images.

The intraoral scanner, also known as an "optical impression camera," emerged in the mid-1980s. These devices use light to create a digital optical impression that reproduces the surface of external anatomical structures in 3D images. They improve dental practice by making impression-taking less uncomfortable for patients, saving clinical time, simplifying storage and archiving, and facilitating transmission to dental technicians when needed. This type of device is already well established in dental practices.

More recently, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), also known as digital volumetric tomography with a conical beam, has begun to develop. This 3D sectional imaging technique allows for the exploration of internal structures by adding an extra dimension.

Imaging examinations provide additional information that complements the findings of the visual clinical oral examination. Together, they help the practitioner establish a diagnosis and treatment plan. Currently, visual information must be recorded manually. Collecting this data represents a significant amount of information, and the success of treatment partly depends on its quality and completeness.

Given the high volume of consultations and the need for practitioners to optimize their time, it would be worthwhile to assess whether optical impressions could help systematically and quickly acquire some of this clinical data to improve patient care.

Similarly, the 3D data provided by CBCT enhances the accuracy of diagnostic information. It would also be useful to evaluate the actual added value of this examination.

The RESTODATA-NUM study follows on from the RESTODATA study, whose results provided recent insights into the oral health status and care needs of adult patients.

The objective of this study is to compare the performance of a standard real-life examination by a practitioner-combining clinical and radiographic assessments-with an examination based on imaging results obtained using digital tools, in terms of detecting dental conditions in a sample of adult patients undergoing an oral examination at one of the participating centers.

Information on the Type of Clinical Investigation:

This is an observational, descriptive, and multicenter study. Based on these characteristics, the study is initially classified by the principal investigator as a Category 3 research project under the Jardé Law (Article R1121-3 of the French Public Health Code, Decree No. 2006-477 of April 26, 2006). The digital tools used in this study (intraoral scanner, panoramic radiography, and cone beam computed tomography) are routinely employed in dental practices. Radiographs will only be performed when medically justified. There will be no deviation from standard patient care, and no additional procedures will be introduced.

Overview of the ReCOL Network and Participating Private Practices:

The ReCOL network is a French clinical research network in dentistry, inspired by a similar model in the United States. Its goal is to involve private dental practitioners in clinical studies. Established in 2018, ReCOL has already conducted several studies, many of which are available on its website: https://recol.fr. The network operates collaboratively, with research topics discussed within the association's executive board. The idea for the RESTODATA-NUM study emerged from one of these discussions.

A total of 36 dental surgeons, all equipped with the necessary tools for the study, responded positively to a call for participation sent via email to all ReCOL members. Some of these practitioners had previously participated in the RESTODATA study.

Study Procedure and Data Collection:

Each participant will attend a single study visit.

Eligibility will be assessed by the investigating dental surgeon. The study will be offered to all patients attending a participating center for an oral examination who meet the inclusion criteria.

An information letter will be provided to each patient. If no urgent care is required, patients may take up to seven days to consider participation and reschedule their appointment if desired. Upon agreement, the patient will sign a non-opposition form.

Primary outcome measures

  • Number of Decayed, Missing, or Filled Teeth in the permanent dentition, measured both clinically and from intraoral scan (IOS) images using the DMFT index [Time frame: at the day of the dental examination]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
  • Location and extent of carious dental lesions [Time frame: At the day of the dental examination]
  • Location and extent of dental wear lesions [Time frame: At the day of the dental examination]
  • Location, extent, and quality of dental restorations across all detection methods: [Time frame: At the day of the dental examination]
  • Periodontal involvement [Time frame: At the day of the dental examination]
  • Endodontic status [Time frame: At the day of the dental examination]
  • Endodontic status [Time frame: At the day of the dental examination]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who have read the information sheet and agreed to participate in the study
  • Patients affiliated with a social security scheme
  • Patients aged 18 years or older
  • New patients to the practice or patients who have not visited the practice in the past six months

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient who has expressed opposition to participating in the study
  • Age < 18 years
  • Individual under legal guardianship or curatorship
  • Pregnant woman
  • Patient currently undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

France · 21 centers
  • Cabinet dentaire Robbiani — Châtillon
  • AP HP — Colombes
  • Cabinet dentaire Ibn Attya Andaloussi — La Chapelle-sur-Erdre
  • Cabinet dentaire Thiébaut — Landivisiau
  • Cabinet dentaire Lemasson — Latresne
  • Cabinet dentaire Pouchoulin — Les Côtes-d'Arey
  • Cabinet dentaire Dougnac-Galant — Lyon
  • AP HM — Marseille
  • … and 13 more centers
Reunion · 1 center
  • Cabinet dentaire Enjary — La Saline

Publications

  • Orstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM. The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1986 Feb;2(1):20-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x. No abstract available. PMID 3457698
  • Van der Velden U. The Dutch periodontal screening index validation and its application in The Netherlands. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Dec;36(12):1018-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01495.x. PMID 19929955
  • Ainamo J, Barmes D, Beagrie G, Cutress T, Martin J, Sardo-Infirri J. Development of the World Health Organization (WHO) community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN). Int Dent J. 1982 Sep;32(3):281-91. No abstract available. PMID 6958657
  • O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972 Jan;43(1):38. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38. No abstract available. PMID 4500182
  • Bartlett D, Ganss C, Lussi A. Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): a new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs. Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Mar;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S65-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0181-5. Epub 2008 Jan 29. PMID 18228057
  • Ismail AI, Pitts NB, Tellez M; Authors of International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS); Banerjee A, Deery C, Douglas G, Eggertsson H, Ekstrand K, Ellwood R, Gomez J, Jablonski-Momeni A, Kolker J, Longbottom C, Manton D, Martignon S, McGrady M, Rechmann P, Ricketts D, Sohn W, Thompson V, Twetman S, Weyant R, Wolff M, Zandona A. The International Caries Classification and Manage PMID 26391116
  • Decup F, Dantony E, Chevalier C, David A, Garyga V, Tohme M, Gueyffier F, Nony P, Maucort-Boulch D, Grosgogeat B. Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):789-801. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5. Epub 2021 Jul 24. PMID 34302555
  • Kaasalainen T, Ekholm M, Siiskonen T, Kortesniemi M. Dental cone beam CT: An updated review. Phys Med. 2021 Aug;88:193-217. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.007. Epub 2021 Jul 17. PMID 34284332

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07205588 · RECOL 2024-01

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗