Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07203664

Use of Tacrolimus and MTOR Inhibitors With Anticipatory Therapy vs. Tacrolimus and Mycophenolic Acid With Universal Prophylaxis in Renal Recipients at High Risk of Posttransplant Cytomegalovirus.

Phase IV Interventional Evaluate the Effectiveness of CMV Prevention Strategies in Kidney Transplant Recipients

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: steroids, tacrolimus and mTOR inhibitors, steroids, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid..
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Evaluate the Effectiveness of CMV Prevention Strategies in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Spain
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Use of Tacrolimus and MTOR Inhibitors With Anticipatory Therapy vs. Tacrolimus and Mycophenolic Acid With Universal Prophylaxis in Renal Recipients at High Risk of Posttransplant Cytomegalovirus. Phase 4 Clinical Trial. TIMTOR STUDY.

Overview

The overall objective of this project is to optimise preventive treatment of CMV infection/disease in renal transplant recipients at increased risk of CMV post-transplantation. The specific objectives are: (1) To compare the incidence of CMV infection/disease at 6 months post-transplant in Ig G CMV positive (R+CMV) recipients receiving induction treatment with thymoglobulin and one of the two maintenance immunosuppressive treatment regimens used in routine clinical practice : tacrolimus and MTOR inhibitors (group 1) or tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid (group 2); (2) To monitor CMV-specific cellular immunity before transplantation, at 15, 30 and 90 days post-transplantation. For this purpose, an exploratory phase 4 clinical trial has been designed in which will select 30 R+CMV patients receiving renal transplantation with induction treatment with thymoglobulin. After signing informed consent, patients will be randomised to receive one of the two immunosuppression regimens indicated above. The patients in group 1 will receive early therapy as a CMV prevention strategy and patients in group 2 will receive universal prophylaxis for 3 months. Follow-up visits to will be conducted according to the usual protocol and clinical and virological variables will be collected. In addition, blood samples will be collected for the assessment of CMV-specific cellular immunity before and after transplantation. The primary endpoint is the presence of CMV infection/disease post-renal transplantation at 6 months. Secondary variables include renal function, acute rejection, patient and graft survival and the occurrence of surgical or haematological complications.

Detailed description

HYPOTHESIS The use of immunosuppressive maintenance therapy including mTOR inhibitors versus the use of mycophenolic acid in kidney transplant patients with an increased risk of post-transplant CMV disease (R+CMV receiving induction with thymoglobulin) will allow optimisation of the preventive treatment of these patients, presenting a similar incidence of post-transplant CMV disease in both groups and better maintenance of CMV-specific cellular immunity post-transplant.

OBJECTIVES General Objective: To improve the preventive treatment of CMV disease in renal transplant patients at increased risk.

Main Objectives: (1) To compare the incidence of CMV disease at 6 months post-renal transplant in Ig G CMV-positive recipients receiving induction treatment with thymoglobulin and maintenance treatment with tacrolimus and mTOR inhibitors (group 1) with CMV prevention strategy of anticipatory therapy or tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid (group 2) with CMV prevention strategy with universal prophylaxis. (2) Monitor CMV-specific cellular immune response before transplantation and at 15, 30 and 90 days post-transplantation in each of the two treatment groups using Quantiferon-CMV.

Secondary Objectives: (3) To compare between the two groups the incidence of CMV infection, delayed initial graft function, acute rejection diagnosed by renal biopsy, renal function and patient and graft survival in the first 6 months post-transplant. (4) To compare between the two groups the presence of surgical (lymphocele requiring intervention) or haematological (neutropenia) complications in the first 6 months post-transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN Phase IV, exploratory, randomised, open-label, single-centre, exploratory clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of CMV prevention strategies comparing early therapy vs. universal prophylaxis in Ig G CMV-positive kidney transplant recipients treated with thymoglobulin receiving tacrolimus and mTOR inhibitors (group 1) vs. tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid (group 2).

Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and who sign the informed consent form the day before transplant surgery (pre-transplant day) will have a blood sample taken for CMV-specific cellular immunity analysis using quantiferon CMV and will be randomised into two groups on the day of renal transplant surgery (day 0).

a) Group 1: Will receive, as a CMV prevention strategy, early therapy, and as maintenance immunosuppressive treatment steroids, tacrolimus and mTOR inhibitors. b) Group 2: Will receive, as a CMV prevention strategy, universal prophylaxis, and as maintenance immunosuppressive therapy steroids, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. A randomisation list will be generated using SAS 9.4. software, in order to achieve a balanced randomisation in the treatment groups. The ratio will be 1:1 for each group and stratified by sex.

Definition of the groups: Group 1: Will receive early therapy, as a prevention strategy, which consists of starting antiviral treatment with valganciclovir (900 mg/12 hours, adjusted to renal function, according to the technical data sheet) when CMV viral replication is detected in blood above 1,000 copies/ml and treatment will be suspended when the viral load is negative in two consecutive controls.

Group 2: will receive universal prophylaxis with valganciclovir (900 mg/24 hours, adjusted to renal function, according to technical data sheet) during the first 3 months post-transplant, as a CMV prevention strategy.

All patients will receive immunosuppressive induction treatment with thymoglobulin (at least 1 dose and a maximum of 5 doses) and immunosuppressive maintenance treatment with tacrolimus + mTOR inhibitors (patients in group 1) or tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid (patients in group 2) following the guidelines of the technical file and the centre's usual protocols.

Follow-up visits will be performed at 15, 30, 90, 120, 120, 150 and 180 days post-transplant where clinical, analytical, virological (CMV viral loads by PCR in whole blood) and immunological (analysis of CMV-specific cellular immunity by CMV quantiferon) data of the patients will be evaluated. Data on the presence or absence of CMV infection or disease at each visit, concomitant medication changes and adverse events will also be collected.

Interventions

  • Combination product steroids, tacrolimus and mTOR inhibitors
    Patients receive immunosuppressive induction treatment with thymoglobulin (at least 1 dose and maximum of 5 doses) and immunosuppressive maintenance treatment with tacrolimus + mTOR inhibitors. Preemptive therapy will be administered as a preventive strategy, consisting of initiating antiviral treatment with valganciclovir (900 mg every 12 hours, adjusted according to renal function as per the technical data sheet) when CMV viral replication in blood exceeds 1,000 copies/ml. Treatment will be di
  • Combination product steroids, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid.
    Patients will receive immunosuppressive induction treatment with thymoglobulin (at least 1 dose and a maximum of 5 doses) and tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid following the guidelines of the technical file and the centre's usual protocols.

Primary outcome measures

  • CMV disease incidence [Time frame: 6 months after renal transplant]
  • Monitor CMV-specific cellular immune response prior to transplantation [Time frame: 4 months]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • To compare between the two groups the incidence of CMV infection, delayed initial graft function, acute rejection diagnosed by renal biopsy, renal function and patient and graft survival [Time frame: 6 months]
  • To compare the presence of surgical (lymphocele requiring intervention) or haematological (neutropenia) complications [Time frame: 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or more.
  • Positive pre-transplant Ig G CMV serology.
  • Receive immunosuppressive induction treatment with thymoglobulin (between 1 and 5 doses).
  • Agree to participate in the study by signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with negative pre-transplant Ig G CMV serology.
  • HIV-infected patients.
  • Patients receiving induction therapy with basiliximab.
  • Patients who cannot comply with the follow-up protocol.
  • Patients who cannot receive iMTOR as initial maintenance immunosuppressive therapy, such as patients with chronic kidney disease secondary to hepatorenal polycystic kidney disease and patients who are expected to undergo complex vascular surgery.
  • Patients who for any reason should not be included in the study according to the evaluation of the research team.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Other

Study locations

Spain · 1 center
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz, Pº de la Castellana, 261 (Servicio de Nefrologia) — Madrid

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07203664 · TIMTOR

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗