Menu
Recruiting NCT07189819

Innovative Closed-loop Functional Electrical Stimulation Control System for Augmenting Post-stroke Gait

No phase Interventional Post-stroke Hemiparesis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Model-Predictive Controller (MPC) Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), Conventional Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES).
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Post-stroke Hemiparesis. Basic parameters: 40 years — 90 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

This study will compare the performance of a novel data-driven model-predictive controller (MPC) based functional electrical stimulation (FES) system versus a conventional FES system for footdrop correction during treadmill and overground walking tasks in people post-stroke.

Detailed description

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a common rehabilitation tool that incorporates electrical stimulation timed with a functional task to augment paretic muscle function in people with neuro-pathologies such as stroke and spinal cord injury. The rigor of previous research has established the safety, as well as both neuro-prosthetic and therapeutic effects of FES systems for standing, walking, and grasping. Stroke is the leading cause of disability, and footdrop is a highly prevalent post-stroke gait deficit, leading to insufficient ankle dorsiflexion during the swing phase of gait, and contributing to reduced mobility. FES systems that correct footdrop to improve gait function and reduce fall risk are gaining popularity, with commercial systems such as enhancing translation potential. Despite their promising functional value, accessibility, and positive neuroplasticity effects, current FES systems have some fundamental limitations, which limit their clinical prescription.

The goal of this project is to overcome two major limitations and technical gaps in FES: rapid onset of muscle fatigue during FES and lack of sophisticated closed-loop control of FES intensity. Most existing FES systems do not automatically modulate stimulation intensity in response to muscle fatigue, and may overstimulate the muscles if fixed (open-loop) stimulation or a pure feedback-based stimulation strategy is used to control FES intensity. To address this limitation, the researchers aim to develop and clinically test FES for improving stroke gait using data-driven FES control systems.

Footdrop is a highly prevalent post-stroke gait deficit, leading to insufficient ankle dorsiflexion during the swing phase of gait, and reducing functional mobility. FES, which is an external application of stimulation to generate muscle contractions during a functional motor task, can achieve muscle force demands during standing and walking, and help persons with stroke and spinal cord injury recover mobility. FES for the correction of footdrop is one of the most popular gait applications of FES, which has been shown to improve mobility and reduce falls.

Although FES has positive effects on walking function, elicits active muscle contractions, and enhances corticomotor excitability, FES is not used as commonly as passive orthotics. Most current FES systems incorporate motion sensors to control the timing of FES during the gait cycle (paretic leg swing phase). However, none of these systems provide automatic closed-loop control of FES intensity, so that optimal stimulation can be delivered for each step, preventing over-stimulation, reducing fatigue, and maintaining optimal muscle performance for a greater number of steps. Additionally, rapid onset of muscle fatigue during FES is caused by synchronous, non-selective, repeated recruitment of largely fatigable muscle fibers.

The researchers will implement an innovative model-predictive controller (MPC) combined with real-time ultrasound-based feedback to deliver optimal FES intensities and minimize fatigue.

Interventions

  • Device Model-Predictive Controller (MPC) Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
    The model-predictive controller (MPC) determines the timing and intensity of electrical stimulation delivered for FES. MPC combined with real-time ultrasound-based feedback delivers optimal FES intensities and minimizes fatigue. FES is delivered to the ankle dorsiflexor muscles using a commercially available FDA-approved electrical stimulator.
  • Device Conventional Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
    For functional electrical stimulation, surface electrodes are placed on the paretic leg on skin overlying the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, with intensity pre-set to elicit dorsiflexion to neutral against gravity. FES will be delivered to the ankle dorsiflexor muscles using a commercially available FDA-approved electrical stimulator.

Primary outcome measures

  • Number of Adverse Events [Time frame: Day 1]
  • Count of Risks [Time frame: Day 1]
  • Participant Perception of Comfort [Time frame: Day 1]
  • Participant Perception of Acceptability [Time frame: Day 1]
  • Percent of Gait Cycles with Footdrop Correction [Time frame: Day 1]
  • Number of Participants Completing Gait Bouts [Time frame: Day 1]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Peak Ankle Dorsiflexion Angle During Swing [Time frame: Day 1]
  • Overground Walking Distance [Time frame: Day 1]
  • FES Intensity [Time frame: Day 1]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • >6 months since stroke
  • cortical or subcortical stroke
  • able to walk 10-meters with or without an assistive device
  • sufficient cardiovascular health and ankle stability to walk on treadmill without ankle orthosis
  • passive ankle range of motion to benefit from dorsiflexor FES assistance
  • resting heart rate 40-100 bpm

Exclusion criteria

  • cerebellar signs
  • score >1 on question 1b (does not know the current month and age) and >0 on question 1c (can not blink eyes and squeeze hands) on NIH Stroke Scale
  • inability to communicate with investigators
  • neglect/hemianopia
  • unexplained dizziness in past 6 months
  • sensory loss in paretic leg
  • musculoskeletal or medical conditions limiting walking
  • neurologic diagnoses other than stroke

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Crossover
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Emory Rehabilitation Hospital — Atlanta

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07189819 · STUDY00010102 · 1R21HD116484 · 2025P013785

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗