Hall Technique vs Conventional Crown Restoration in Permanent Molars: Split-Mouth Trial in Children
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Stainless steel crown placement using Hall Technique, Stainless steel crown placement using conventional method.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Permanent Molars, Dental Caries, Tooth Decay, Permanent First Molar Caries. Basic parameters: 8 years — 15 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Syria
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
The Effectiveness of Using the Hall Technique in Restoring First Permanent Molars
Overview
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns placed using the Hall Technique versus the conventional method in the restoration of permanent first molars in children, and to evaluate their effects on occlusal relationships, crown adaptation, and patient satisfaction. Study Outcomes The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns placed on permanent first molars using the Hall Technique in comparison to the conventional crown placement method. The secondary outcomes included assessment of the marginal fit and adaptation of preformed crowns using both techniques, analysis of changes in occlusal relationships-specifically the vertical dimension of occlusion and overbite-and evaluation of patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was measured using a five-point Likert scale at multiple time points: immediately post-treatment, and at one, three, and six months.
Detailed description
Detailed Description of the Study
This clinical study is designed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of the Hall Technique and the conventional crown placement method for restoring permanent first molars in children using a split-mouth design. The study will be conducted at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tishreen University.
A total of 10 pediatric patients will be recruited according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each child will present with at least two eligible permanent first molars requiring full coronal restoration with stainless steel crowns. In the split-mouth design, each child will serve as their own control: one molar will be treated using the Hall Technique (HT), and the contralateral molar will be restored using the conventional method. The allocation of which technique will be applied to which side will be randomized for each patient to minimize bias.
Inclusion criteria will include:
* Permanent first molars with carious lesions affecting two or more surfaces or presenting Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH). * Absence of clinical signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis. * Radiographic confirmation of an intact dentin layer and absence of internal or external root resorption or periapical pathology.
Exclusion criteria will include:
* Known allergy to nickel. * Severely broken-down molars not suitable for SSC placement. * Missing opposing teeth. * Pulpal exposure during treatment.
In the HT group, stainless steel crowns will be placed without local anesthesia, without caries removal, and without any tooth preparation. Orthodontic separators will be placed if necessary during the first visit, and crown cementation will be performed using glass ionomer cement (GIC) during the follow-up visit.
In the conventional group, local anesthesia will be administered, and standard tooth preparation will be carried out (occlusal and proximal reduction), followed by fitting and cementation of the stainless steel crown using GIC.
Clinical and radiographic evaluations will be conducted at multiple time points: at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment. These evaluations will aim to assess the success of the restoration based on crown integrity, presence of clinical symptoms, and radiographic signs of pulpal or periapical pathology.
Patient satisfaction will be measured using a five-point Likert scale, recorded immediately after treatment and again at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
The primary outcome of the study will be the clinical and radiographic success of the restorations.
The secondary outcomes will include assessment of marginal fit and crown adaptation, changes in occlusal relationships (overbite), and patient satisfaction.
Interventions
- Device Stainless steel crown placement using Hall Technique
Preformed stainless steel crowns are placed on permanent first molars without local anesthesia, caries removal, or tooth preparation. Orthodontic separators are used as needed, and crowns are cemented with glass ionomer cement - Device Stainless steel crown placement using conventional method
Preformed stainless steel crowns are placed after administering local anesthesia and performing standard tooth preparation, including occlusal and proximal reduction. Crowns are cemented with glass ionomer cement.
Primary outcome measures
- Clinical and Radiographic Success [Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- - Marginal Fit and Adaptation - Changes in Occlusion ( Overbite) - Patient Satisfaction (Likert Scale) [Time frame: Time Frame: Immediately post-treatment, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion Criteria (Clinical):
- No signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis
- Molars with carious lesions affecting two or more surfaces
- Permanent first molars with developmental defects
Inclusion Criteria (Radiographic):
- First molars with an intact dentin layer visible radiographically
- No signs of internal or external resorption
- No evidence of periradicular bone resorption
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with known nickel allergy
- Severely damaged molars not restorable with preformed crowns
- First molars without opposing teeth
- Pulp exposure during caries excavation
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Syria · 1 center
- Faculty of Dentistry, Tishreen University — Latakia
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07186673 · Hall T in Permanent Molars