Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07183566

CT Volume Measurement of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Observational Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) CT

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Ct.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), CT. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Ct Volume Measurement of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) or Microwave Ablation (MWA)

Overview

The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of CT volumetric measurement in assessing treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following trans arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or microwave ablation (MWA)

Detailed description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the predominant form of primary liver cancer and a major contributor to cancer-related mortality worldwide (1). Conventional curative interventions for HCC encompass liver transplantation, hepatic resection, and thermal ablation. Regrettably, fewer than 30% of patients qualify for surgery upon diagnosis, and many tumor-related characteristics, including size and location, may inhibit the application of thermal ablative methods .

In these cases, locoregional therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) play a pivotal role. Both techniques aim to achieve local tumor control and improve patient survival. TACE induces ischemic necrosis through targeted delivery of chemotherapeutic agents combined with arterial embolization, whereas MWA achieves tumor destruction by generating high-frequency electromagnetic waves that produce thermal coagulative necrosis. Accurate assessment of treatment response is essential for guiding clinical decisions and predicting outcomes. Conventional imaging-based response criteria, such as RECIST and mRECIST, primarily focus on changes in lesion diameter. However, these methods may not fully reflect the extent of tumor necrosis or viable residual tissue . In this context, CT-based volumetric measurements have emerged as a more objective and sensitive tool for evaluating therapeutic response after locoregional treatment. Volumetric analysis provides a three-dimensional assessment of tumor burden and may bet ter correlate with treatment efficacy and prognosis compared to traditional linear measurements. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the role of CT volumetric measurement of HCC after TACE or microwave ablation in evaluating treatment response and predicting clinical outcomes .

Interventions

  • Device Ct
    Ct volume measurement of HCC after TACE or MWA

Primary outcome measures

  • Ct volume measurent of hepatocellular carcinoma after Transarterial chemoembolization or microwave ablation [Time frame: Baseline]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of HCC based on AASLD or EASL criteria.
  • Patients deemed unresectable by the multidisciplinary tumor board.
  • Patients scheduled for TACE as the primary locoregional therapy.
  • Preserved liver function (Child-Pugh class A or B).
  • Adequate renal function to permit contrast-enhanced CT.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with extrahepatic metastases or portal vein thrombosis.
  • Patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast or TACE.
  • Patients with severe comorbid illness that precludes participation.
  • Patients refuse to provide informed consent.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07183566 · Ct volume measaurement of HCC

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗