Menu
Recruiting NCT07173088

Efficacy and Clinical Feasibility of the Ankle Muscle Power (AMP) Program for Return to Duty After an Ankle Fracture

No phase Interventional Ankle Fractures

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Ankle Muscle Power (AMP) program, Standard of Care.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Ankle Fractures. Basic parameters: 18 years — 50 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different standardized physical therapy rehabilitation programs on outcomes after an ankle fracture. Researchers will evaluate to see if the addition of ankle muscle power exercises (AMP) improve program adherence, muscle function, physical performance, and patient reported outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Assess feasibility and define the initial effects of the AMP program on ankle plantar flexor rate of torque development and ankle power. Primary hypothesis: an ankle muscle power program will have acceptable feasibility through assessment of 80% adherence, 90% treatment fidelity, recruitment (48 participants who complete the study), 80% retention, and 80% acceptability of the AMP program to facilitate clinical translation and the ability to scale-up the treatment. In addition ankle plantar flexor muscle power, plantar flexor RTD assessed isometrically, and ankle joint power, evaluated during gait and stair ascent/descent, will have significantly greater improvements in the AMP group than the standard of care group at the end of the intervention. 2. Test the effect of the AMP program on physical performance. Primary hypothesis: those completing the AMP program will have greater improvements in the 40 meter fast paced walk test and 11-stair climb test than those completing standard of care at the completion of the intervention. 3. Assess the preliminary efficacy of the AMP program on patient reported outcomes and quality of life. Primary hypothesis: compared to standard of care, the AMP program will result in improved quality of life on the ankle fracture outcome rehabilitation measure (A-FORM) Participants will complete rehabilitation and be assessed for outcomes at baseline and after completing the intervention. Additionally exploratory outcomes will be assessed 3 months after completing the intervention.

Interventions

  • Other Ankle Muscle Power (AMP) program
    The AMP program targets various aspects of muscle power development through a program that takes the participant through 3 different stages of training over the course of their rehabilitation. This portion of the program is in addition to receiving standard rehabilitation exercises as well.
  • Behavioral Standard of Care
    Standard rehabilitation program

Primary outcome measures

  • Percentage of Participants Adhering to the Intervention [Time frame: From baseline assessment to completion of the 10 week intervention.]
  • Percentage of Treatment That is Able to be Delivered (Fidelity) [Time frame: From baseline assessment to completion of the 10 week intervention.]
  • Percentage of Participants Completing the Intervention (Retention) [Time frame: From baseline assessment to completion of the 10 week intervention.]
  • Percentage of Participants Who Find the Program Acceptable/Satisfactory [Time frame: From baseline assessment to completion of the 10 week intervention.]
  • Change in Isometric Ankle Plantar Flexor Muscle Power [Time frame: Baseline assessment and post intervention visit (10-12 weeks following baseline)]
  • Change in Ankle Rate of Torque Development (Ankle RTD) [Time frame: Baseline assessment and post intervention visit (10-12 weeks following baseline)]
  • Change in Ankle Joint Power During Gait [Time frame: Baseline and post intervention (10-12 weeks following baseline)]
  • Change in Ankle Joint Power During Stairs (step up and down) [Time frame: Baseline and post intervention (10-12 weeks following baseline)]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Change in Usual Gait Speed [Time frame: Baseline and post intervention (10-12 weeks following baseline)]
  • Change in Fastest Gait Speed [Time frame: Baseline and following completion of the intervention (10-12 weeks post baseline visit)]
  • Change in 11 Stair Climb Test Score [Time frame: Baseline visit and post intervention visit (10-12 weeks post baseline)]
  • Change in Ankle fracture outcome rehabilitation measure (A-FORM) [Time frame: Baseline and post intervention (10-12 weeks following baseline)]
  • Change in PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test [Time frame: Baseline assessment and post intervention visit (10-12 weeks later)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-50 years old
  • Acute orthopedic injury to the ankle requiring surgical fixation
  • Must have stable address and phone number to schedule follow up contact visits
  • English speaking
  • BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

  • History of chronic pain defined as pain lasting more than 3 months and bothersome at least half the days over the past 6 months that started before the fracture
  • Moderate or severe traumatic brain injury
  • Initial treatment requiring amputation
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Unable to speak or read English
  • History of schizophrenia, dementia, neurologic disorder with peripheral dysfunction, or other psychotic disorder based upon medical record or patient self-report
  • Any chronic conditions that would limit their ability to participate in an intervention
  • Multiple trauma that prevents engaging in intervention
  • Pregnant
  • Unable to participate in or complete in-person follow up visits or therapy sessions
  • In Physical Therapy at the start of the intervention.
  • Use of an assistive device to walk for community ambulation
  • Prior lower extremity fracture within the past 2 years

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • University of Kentucky — Lexington

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07173088 · 103812 · HT9425-25-1-0625

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗