Bracing After Ankle Fracture
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: ankel stirrup, Foot-ankel brace (walker).
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Ankle Fracture, Rehabilitation, Recovery. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Denmark, Faroe Islands
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Bracing After Ankle Fracture (BAF): a Randomised Multicenter Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Ankle Stirrups to Walkers on Pain, Function and Social Interaction for Adults After Ankle Fracture - Study Protocol
Overview
Ankle fractures are common, debilitating and usually treated with immobilisation using a foot-ankle brace (walker). Emerging evidence suggests that a less restrictive brace may reduce recovery time without increasing the risk of complications, and patients tend to prefer ankle stirrups. However, evidence supporting their non-inferiority remains limited and inconclusive. Thus, the aim is assess if an ankle stirrup is non-inferior to a standard walker in reducing pain and function measured by the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) three months after ankle fracture. The hypothesis is that ankel stirrups align better with patients preferenes for less immobilising braces and offer sufficient stability while the fracture heals. Secondarily it may lead to faster recovery of function, return to work and reduced cost. The sample size of a maximum of 1400 patients allow us to assess non-inferiority in age and sex specific subgroups and treatment (surgical or non-sugical). Non-inferiority will be assessed in a pragmatic, multicenter, randomised controlled trial involving Scandinavian orthopedic departments.
Detailed description
Ankle fractures are the third most occuring fracture. After an ankle fracture, patients experience reduced ankle function and pain \[3\]. Also, evidence with moderate to high risk of bias indicate that immobilisation prolong patients recovery. However, high quality evidence are necessary for finite conclusions.
In Scandinavia, foot-ankle braces (walkers) are used to immobilise the fracture while healing. Even though patients acknowledge the need for immobilisation, a qualitative study of ten patients found that patients experienced difficulties in adhering to the recommendation of immobilisation after ankle fracture. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) by Smeeing et al. 2020 found that braces and elastic bands that allow more ankle movement than walkers did not lead to poorer functional outcomes (p=0.56), but may lead to a faster return to work (p = 0.02) without increased complications (p=0.63). The RCT was terminated when half the sample had been included, thus questioning the statistical power of the findings. Based on patient interviews completed during trial preparations we learned that patients preferred ankle stirrups as they allowed movement during use. The same patients also expressed an aversion to the walker, while being hesitant that ankle-supporting elastic bandages provided sufficient support.
Compared to the walker, ankle stirrups may better align with patient preferences while remaining non-inferior in restoring ankle-related outcomes such as pain and function.
Patients will be included in the orthopedic outpatient departments and randomised to a walker or an ankle stirrup. Randomisation will be in blocks to ensure that surgically and non-surgically patients are evenly distributed between groups and that each center will have an equal amount of intervention and control patients. Weightbearing will be unrestricted in both groups so the difference will be the brace (ankel stirrup or walker). Other variation will be a reflection of usual practice. The primary outcome is a validated score including pain, function and social interaction 12 weeks after ankel fracture. The sample size is calculated to 140 patients per each of six subgroups (males 18-39, females 18-39, males 40-59, females 40-59, males 60+, females 60+) randomisation stop when the smallest subgroup (females 18-39 years) reaches 140 or a maximum of 1400 has been included. Patients have been involved in designing the trial and a former ankle fracture patient serves a member of the steering committee.
Interventions
- Other ankel stirrup
Ankel stirrups are a patient preferred ankel brace that allow active ankle dorsal and plantar flexion during weightbearing while maintaining lateral stability. - Other Foot-ankel brace (walker)
Walkers immobilise and stabilise the ankle during weightbearing.
Primary outcome measures
- Index score (0-100) of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) [Time frame: Measured as the change from baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks]
Secondary outcome measures (8)
- Physical activity [Time frame: Measured as the change from baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks]
- Health-related Quality Of Life (HRQOL) [Time frame: Measured as the change from baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks]
- Ankle dorsiflexion [Time frame: Measured as the change from baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks]
- Ankle strength [Time frame: Measured as the change from baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks]
- Hospital costs [Time frame: Measured as the total cost from baseline and after 12 weeks]
- Return to work [Time frame: From fracture and until date of return to work.]
- Index score (0-100) of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in subgroups [Time frame: Measured as the change from baseline after 6 and 12 weeks.]
- Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) [Time frame: Safety reporting for each patient will begin at baseline and after 6 and twelve weeks]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- 18 years or older
- Surgically or non-surgically treated ankle fracture
Exclusion criteria
- Pathological fractures
- Inadequacy to read or speak danish
- Open fractures
- Prolonged need for immobilisation (e.g. non-union or insufficient wound healing)
- Inability to adhere to trial procedures (e.g. neuropathy or severe psychiatric disorder)
- Restricted weightbearing
- Uninterest in participating
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Denmark · 15 centers
- Orthopedic Department, Hospital of Southern Jutland — Aabenraa
- Orthopedic Department, Aalborg Universitets Hospital — Aalborg
- Orthopedic Department, Aarhus University Hospital — Aarhus
- Orthopedic Department, Bispebjerg Hospital — Copenhagen
- Orthopedic Department, Hospital of South West Jutland — Esbjerg
- Orthopedic Department, Herlev Hospital — Herlev
- Orthopedic Department, North Zealand Hospital — Hillerød
- Orthopedic Department, Hvidovre Hospital — Hvidovre
- … and 7 more centers
Faroe Islands · 1 center
- Surgical Centre, National Hospital of the Faroe Islands — Tórshavn
Publications
- Ipsen JA, Holsgaard-Larsen A, Abrahamsen C, Gundtoft PH, Costa M, Mikkelsen SS, Hrobjartsson A, Viberg B. A study protocol for a randomised trial of bracing after ankle fracture. Dan Med J. 2026 Mar 19;73(4):A09250748. doi: 10.61409/A09250748. PMID 41978451
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07163091 · OP_2497/OT_0001 · 10.46540/4308-00191B