Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07153354

Patient-Specific Guides vs. Classical Workflow in Class IV Mandibular Fracture Fixation

No phase Interventional Mandibular Class Iv Fractures

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: patient-specific screw holes locating surgical guide and pre-bent plates, 2 titanium per-bent mini plates.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Mandibular Class Iv Fractures. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Precision of Patient-specific Screw Holes Locating Surgical Guide and Pre-bent Plates Osteosynthesis Versus Classical Workflow in the Management of Class IV Mandibular Fractures

Overview

This study aims to overcome the limitations of current, standard approach of mandibular fracture reduction and fixation including improper alignment of segments, malocclusion, nerve affections and related teeth roots injury. The introduction of Computer Aided designing/Computer Aided manufacturing software has provided surgeons with an opportunity to perform virtual manipulations of computed tomography datasets preoperatively and production of corrected mandibular model for plate pre-bending and fabrication of plate locating surgical guide which provide accurate segment reduction and fixation with accurate post-operative occlusion and minimal post-operative complication.

Interventions

  • Device patient-specific screw holes locating surgical guide and pre-bent plates
    Virtual reduction of the fracture will be done, followed by 3D printing of the corrected mandible model. Plates will be pre-bent on the model, then scanned in position to create a surgical guide for accurate screw hole placement during surgery.
  • Device 2 titanium per-bent mini plates
    The fixation will be performed according to established surgical principles for managing class iv mandibular fractures, without patient-specific planning

Primary outcome measures

  • Accuracy of fracture reduction [Time frame: Within one week postoperatively]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Occlusion [Time frame: At 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively]
  • Operation time [Time frame: During the surgery]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with delayed mandibular class IV fracture need open reduction and internal fixation.
  • Patients with a medical history that did not hinder plate placement (uncontrolled diabetes) and adequate proper oral hygiene.
  • Both genders, males and females, will be included

Exclusion criteria

  • General contraindications to surgery.
  • Patients with unfavorable or comminuted fractures.
  • Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before fixation.
  • Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes.
  • Pregnant or nursing.
  • Substance abuse.
  • Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
  • Severe bruxism or clenching.
  • Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised.
  • Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
  • Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be properly followed.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07153354 · 3D-T4F-RCT-2025

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗