Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07151651

A Comparison Between Biportal and Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

No phase Interventional Lumbar Disc Herniation

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Endoscopic lumbar discectomy.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Lumbar Disc Herniation. Basic parameters: 18 years — 70 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Egypt
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Comparative Study Between Uniportal and Biportal Endocopic Techniques on Clinical and Surgical Outcomes

Overview

This study aims to provide a detailed comparison between different methods of lumbar discectomy by the use of different types of spine endoscopy to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of each type

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to compare between uniportal and biportal endoscopic techniques in patients with lumbar disc herniation in terms of efficacy, safety, and learning curve of endoscopic spine surgery .The research will focus on clinical outcomes, functional recovery, complication rates, patient satisfaction and surgical proficiency in different endoscopic spine surgery techniques, including uniportal and biportal approaches assessing their relative advantages and limitations.

Interventions

  • Procedure Endoscopic lumbar discectomy
    Uniportal and boportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (transforaminal or interlaminar)

Primary outcome measures

  • Primary outcome measures After endoscopic lumbar discectomy Pain relief [Time frame: 12 weeks up to 2 years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients should fulfill the following criteria
  • Patients aged 18-70 years.
  • single-level lumbar disc herniation (L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1) confirmed by MRI.
  • Persistent symptoms not responding to conservative management (≥6 weeks).

Exclusion criteria

  • All patients should not have any of the following criteria
  • Multilevel disc herniation.
  • Previous lumbar spine surgery, trauma or injection.
  • Severe spinal stenosis.
  • Severe osteoporosis, infection, or malignancy or autoimmune disease affecting the spine.
  • Uncontrolled medical comorbidities contraindicating surgery.
  • Instability: spondylolisthesis>grade 1
  • Marked obesity.(BMI >35-40 kg/m2 )

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Egypt · 1 center
  • Sohag University — Sohag

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07151651 · Sohag-Med-25-8---4MD

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗