Impact of Non-medicalized ECG Practices Initiated by SAMU in Dispatch Strategies
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: ECG by the SMUR after medical interrogation by the SAMU, ECG performed by a non-medical vector.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Acute Coronary Syndromes. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Participants Are Not Assigned to Interventions Based on a Protocol
Overview
The performance of an ECG by non-medicalized prehospital teams (firefighters, first responders, paramedic ambulances) is developing across the territory to cope with the increasing demand (SAMU calls) for a service that cannot meet it (limited Mobile Emergency and Resuscitation Unit - SMUR - teams). Early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome is key to appropriate management. A delay in care can quickly lead to complications ranging from rhythm disorders to cardiac arrest. Furthermore, as with reperfusion in strokes, the earlier reperfusion treatment is initiated, the greater the beneficial effect in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Moreover, the main elements for diagnosing STEMI in the prehospital setting remain the ECG, along with the anamnesis (medical history) and clinical examination (typical pain). This is an observational, retrospective and single-center study (SAMU 91) carried out between September 1, 2023 and December 31, 2024. The inclusion criteria for our study were adult patients who had been regulated by SAMU 91 during a primary intervention and who had ST+ ACS registered in the eMUST registry. The main objective was to study the difference in the admission times of patients admitted to the emergency intensive care unit of cardiology or coronary angiography and presenting with ST+ ACS on the ECG performed by a primary SMUR team versus a non-medical team referred by the SAMU. The secondary objectives were to study the descriptive variables between the two groups (SMUR and non-medicalized vector), the typicity of pain, the mortality rate and the morbidity rate between the two groups.
Detailed description
The list of patients with ST+ ACS in department 91 during the year 2023 and 2024 were extracted from the E-Must registry (Registry for the Evaluation in Emergency Medicine of Therapeutic Strategies for Myocardial Infarction of less than 24 hours treated by the SAMU/SMUR of Île-de-France) and the missing information was retrieved via the SAMUScript medical regulation software (call schedules, address of the place of intervention,...)
Interventions
- Other ECG by the SMUR after medical interrogation by the SAMU
Patients who had the qualifying ECG by the SMUR after medical interrogation by the SAMU - Other ECG performed by a non-medical vector
Patients who have called the emergency services with either an ECG performed by a non-medical vector (SP or ambulance), or a decision to reinforce SMUR during the first aid assessment
Primary outcome measures
- Time to Coronary Angiography or Cardiology Intensive Care Admission [Time frame: day 0]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Adult patient
- Patient regulated by the SAMU 91 between 09/2023 and 12/2024
- Patient referred for coronary angiography for ST+ ACS
- Patient registered in the E-Must register (Registry for the Evaluation in Emergency Medicine of Therapeutic Strategies for Myocardial Infarction of less than 24 hours treated by the SAMU/SMUR of Île-de-France)
Exclusion criteria
- Secondary transport
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07144059 · 2025/0017