Effects of tDCS on Cognitive Flexibility and EEG Oscillations in Orthorexia Nervosa
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Active tDCS, Sham tDCS.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Orthorexia Nervosa. Basic parameters: 18 years — 40 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Turkey (Türkiye)
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
Orthorexia Nervosa (ON); is a condition characterized by individuals being overly focused on healthy eating habits, constantly checking and classifying the foods they will consume. ON has not yet been clinically defined as an eating disorder or in a different category, and has not been included in DSM-5. Cognitive flexibility can be defined as a person's ability to quickly change their thinking and behaviors to adapt to different situations and changing conditions. It has been reported that cognitive flexibility skills are impaired in ON. There is evidence that tDCS, a neuromodulation method, increases cognitive flexibility skills. On the other hand, although there are EEG studies on eating disorders, there is no EEG study directly studying ON, and there is no information on the EEG profiles of individuals with high ON scores. For this reason, EEG studies on eating disorders and obsessive behaviors are generally generalized to orthorexia nervosa and are interpreted. This study aims to compare the EEG oscillations and cognitive flexibility skills of individuals with high ON scores with a control group and to examine the effects of anodal tDCS application on these two variables. For this purpose, a total of 48 individuals, 24 healthy and 24 high ON scores, will be included in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to tDCS experimental and control groups. Therefore, 48 participants will be divided into 4 different subgroups of 12 people each. Data collection tools will be Informed Consent Form, Demographic Information Form, Beck Depression Inventory, Orthorexia Nervosa Test (TON-17), Cognitive flexibility task. First, participants will be subjected to a cognitive flexibility task by taking simultaneous EEG recordings, then tDCS stimulation will be initiated (active or sham) and after stimulation, a cognitive flexibility task will be performed by taking simultaneous EEG recordings again. EEG analyses will be performed using the Brain-Vision Analyzer program. Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (within-group and between-groups) will be used in statistical analyses.
Detailed description
Measurement instruments:
Informed Voluntary Consent Form Demographic Information Form Edinburgh Hand Preference Survey Beck Depression Scale Test of Orthorexia Nervosa (TON-17) Cognitive Flexibility Task EEG and tDCS devices Statistics: Statistical analyses will be conducted using SPSS 25.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows, and EEG data will be analyzed using the Brain-Vision Analyzer software.
Descriptive statistics for group variables such as age and education will be presented as means and standard deviations, while gender will be reported as frequency and percentage.
The normality of the distribution of variables will be assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests will be applied based on the results.
To evaluate pre-test and post-test data for cognitive flexibility and EEG measures in the experimental and control groups, Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (within- and between-subjects) or its non-parametric equivalent, the Friedman Test, will be used.
For all statistical tests, a significance level of p \< 0.05 will be considered as the threshold for statistical significance.
Interventions
- Device Active tDCS
20 min, 2 milliampere (mA), Anodal tDCS in left DLPFC - Device Sham tDCS
20 min, left DLPFC Sham tDCS
Primary outcome measures
- Change in EEG Oscillations in individuals with Orthorexia Nervosa for active vs. sham stimulation [Time frame: Baseline, 5 minutes after completion of the active/sham stimulation]
- Change in Cognitive Flexibility Task score in individuals with Orthorexia Nervosa for active vs. sham stimulation [Time frame: Baseline, 20 minutes after completion of the active/sham stimulation]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Being between the ages of 18-40,
- Having a score of 17 or less on the Beck Depression Inventory
- Having a score of 61 or more on the Test for Orthorexia Nervosa (TON-17) for the orthorexia group
Exclusion criteria
- Having a history of serious neurological and psychiatric illness,
- Currently taking medication that alters the cortical excitability level,
- Having visual defects that cannot be corrected with glasses
- Use of intracranial metal objects, implanted stimulating devices or pacemakers
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
Study locations
Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
- Istanbul Medipol University — Istanbul
Publications
- Emek Savas DD, Yerlikaya D, G Yener G, Oktem Tanor O. Validity, Reliability and Normative Data of the Stroop Test Capa Version. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2020 Spring;31(1):9-21. doi: 10.5080/u23549. English, Turkish. PMID 32594475
- Du M, Peng Y, Li Y, Zhu Y, Yang S, Li J, Zou F, Wang Y, Wu X, Zhang Y, Zhang M. Effect of trait anxiety on cognitive flexibility: Evidence from event-related potentials and resting-state EEG. Biol Psychol. 2022 Apr;170:108319. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108319. Epub 2022 Mar 22. PMID 35331781
- Dong G, Wang Y, Chen X. Anodal occipital tDCS enhances spontaneous alpha activity. Neurosci Lett. 2020 Mar 16;721:134796. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134796. Epub 2020 Jan 30. PMID 32006627
- Donaldson PH, Kirkovski M, Yang JS, Bekkali S, Enticott PG. High-definition tDCS to the right temporoparietal junction modulates slow-wave resting state power and coherence in healthy adults. J Neurophysiol. 2019 Oct 1;122(4):1735-1744. doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 28. PMID 31461371
- Darna M, Stolz C, Jauch HS, Strumpf H, Hopf JM, Seidenbecher CI, Schott BH, Richter A. Frontal theta oscillations and cognitive flexibility: Age-related modulations in EEG activity. Aging Brain. 2025 Jun 24;8:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.nbas.2025.100142. eCollection 2025. PMID 40620518
- Chrysikou EG, Hamilton RH, Coslett HB, Datta A, Bikson M, Thompson-Schill SL. Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use. Cogn Neurosci. 2013;4(2):81-9. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2013.768221. PMID 23894253
- Cavinato M, Genna C, Formaggio E, Gregorio C, Storti SF, Manganotti P, Casanova E, Piperno R, Piccione F. Behavioural and electrophysiological effects of tDCS to prefrontal cortex in patients with disorders of consciousness. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Feb;130(2):231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 29. PMID 30580246
- Borwick C, Lal R, Lim LW, Stagg CJ, Aquili L. Dopamine depletion effects on cognitive flexibility as modulated by tDCS of the dlPFC. Brain Stimul. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):105-108. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.08.016. Epub 2019 Aug 31. PMID 31494070
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07141979 · E-10840098-202.3.02-35.59