Kinesio Taping for the Knee and Ankle: Acute Impact on Balance, Proprioception, and ACL Risk
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Kinesio Taping (KT) applied to the knee then ankle, Kinesio Taping (KT) applied to the ankle then knee.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: ACL Injury, Kinesiotape, Balance, Proprioception. Basic parameters: 18 years — 45 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Turkey (Türkiye)
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Evaluation and Comparison of the Acute Effects of Kinesio Taping Applied to the Knee and Ankle in the Lower Extremity on Balance, Proprioception, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Using the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS)
Overview
This study aims to evaluate and compare the acute effects of Kinesio taping applied to the knee and ankle on balance, proprioception, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk using the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS). Designed as a randomized crossover trial, the study will include 24 healthy volleyball athletes with at least 5 years of experience. All participants will receive both ankle and knee taping interventions, separated by a one-week washout period. Assessments will be conducted at four time points: before and after each taping. Outcome measures include the Y-Balance Test, proprioception tests, and LESS.
Detailed description
Objective:
This study aims to evaluate and compare the acute effects of Kinesio taping applied to the knee and ankle on balance, proprioception, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk, assessed via the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS).
Methods:
A randomized crossover design will be used. The study will be conducted at Gazi University with 24 healthy adult volleyball athletes (≥18 years) who have been licensed players for at least 5 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to two experimental sequences:
Group A: knee taping followed by ankle taping
Group B: ankle taping followed by knee taping Each taping intervention will be separated by a one-week washout period. Assessments will be performed immediately before and after each taping session.
Knee taping will be performed using a valgus-control spiral taping technique with 50% stretch. Ankle taping will be conducted using the "figure-of-eight" method, also with 50% stretch. All applications will be administered by the same licensed physiotherapist to ensure consistency.
Outcome Measures:
Balance: Y-Balance Test (anterior, posteromedial, posterolateral reach)
Proprioception: Joint position sense tests for the knee and ankle (with eyes closed, angular replication tasks)
Injury Risk: LESS test evaluating landing biomechanics and scoring 17 specific kinematic errors
Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS v24.0. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests will be used depending on data normality. A significance level of p\<0.05 will be adopted.
Expected Results:
Kinesio taping is expected to acutely enhance proprioceptive feedback and postural control in both the knee and ankle, resulting in improved landing mechanics and a reduction in ACL injury risk. The relative effectiveness of each taping site will also be compared.
Interventions
- Procedure Kinesio Taping (KT) applied to the knee then ankle
Procedure/Surgery: Procedure/Surgery: Kinesio Taping (KT) applied to the knee or ankle Kinesio taping was applied using a standard Y-strip with approximately 50% tension over the dominant lower extremity. In the "Knee Taping" condition, the tape was applied over the vastus medialis oblique and patellar tendon. In the "Ankle Taping" condition, the tape was applied over the peroneus longus and tibialis anterior muscles. Each taping intervention was performed by a trained physiotherapist and remain - Procedure Kinesio Taping (KT) applied to the ankle then knee
Kinesio taping was applied using a standard Y-strip with approximately 50% tension over the dominant lower extremity. In the "Knee Taping" condition, the tape was applied over the vastus medialis oblique and patellar tendon. In the "Ankle Taping" condition, the tape was applied over the peroneus longus and tibialis anterior muscles. Each taping intervention was performed by a trained physiotherapist and remained in place during the assessment session. The purpose of the intervention is to examin
Primary outcome measures
- Landing biomechanics score based on LESS (Landing Error Scoring System) [Time frame: "Immediately after each taping intervention (same day)"]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
- Dynamic balance score based on the Y-Balance Test [Time frame: "Immediately after each taping intervention (same day)"]
- Proprioception accuracy based on joint position sense [Time frame: "Immediately after each taping intervention (same day)"]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Volunteering to participate in the study
- Being 18 years of age or older
- Being a licensed and regular volleyball player for at least 5 years
Exclusion criteria
- Being enrolled in another study or treatment program
- Being unable to complete the study for any other reason
- Having suffered a lower extremity injury within 6 months prior to participating in the study
- Female participants must be in their menstrual cycle
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
Study locations
Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
- Gaziosmapasa University — Tokat Province
Publications
- Monferrer D, Tralau T, Kertesz MA, Panjikar S, Uson I. High crystallizability under air-exclusion conditions of the full-length LysR-type transcriptional regulator TsaR from Comamonas testosteroni T-2 and data-set analysis for a MIRAS structure-solution approach. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2008 Aug 1;64(Pt 8):764-9. doi: 10.1107/S1744309108019738. Epub 2008 Jul 31. PMID 18678953
- Choi SH, Lee BH, Kim HJ, Jung SW, Hwang SH, Nah SY. Differential effects of ginsenoside metabolites on slowly activating delayed rectifier K(+) and KCNQ1 K(+) channel currents. J Ginseng Res. 2013 Jul;37(3):324-31. doi: 10.5142/jgr.2013.37.324. PMID 24198658
- Treuth MS, Butte NF, Puyau M. Pregnancy-related changes in physical activity, fitness, and strength. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 May;37(5):832-7. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000161749.38453.02. PMID 15870638
- Braith RW, Edwards DG. Exercise following heart transplantation. Sports Med. 2000 Sep;30(3):171-92. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200030030-00003. PMID 10999422
- Siparsky PN, Kocher MS. Current concepts in pediatric and adolescent arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2009 Dec;25(12):1453-69. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Jul 24. PMID 19962074
- Abrams PJ, Emerson CR. Rivaroxaban: a novel, oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Feb;29(2):167-81. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.2.167. PMID 19170587
- Schatz P, Moser RS, Solomon GS, Ott SD, Karpf R. Prevalence of invalid computerized baseline neurocognitive test results in high school and collegiate athletes. J Athl Train. 2012 May-Jun;47(3):289-96. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.3.14. PMID 22892410
- Koitabashi K, Okamoto K, Arirto M, Sato T, Nagai K, Kurokawa MS, Suematsu N, Yasuda T, Kimura K, Kato T. Micro-sieving: isolation of whole glomeruli from a single renal needle biopsy sample. Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;117(3):c225-9. doi: 10.1159/000320198. Epub 2010 Aug 31. PMID 20805695
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07138573 · 2025 - 1154