Changes in Portal Vein Pulsatility Variability During a Tidal Volume Challenge Can Predict Fluid Tolerance
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Venous Congestion. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
In critically ill patients, appropriate fluid administration is one of the cornerstones of hemodynamic management, as both hypovolemia and fluid overload can negatively impact clinical outcomes. For years, fluid responsiveness-defined as an increase in cardiac output following volume administration-has guided decision-making in the postoperative ICU. However, fluid responsiveness alone does not guarantee fluid tolerance, which refers to the venous system's ability to accommodate volume without developing venous congestion or adverse effects such as pulmonary edema, renal or hepatic dysfunction. The tidal volume challenge (TVC)-which consists of a transient increase in tidal volume from 6 to 8 mL/kg-has been shown to predict fluid responsiveness by enhancing the hemodynamic interaction between the heart and lungs during the cardiac cycle, as measured through dynamic arterial indices such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) or stroke volume variation (SVV). However, these indices do not provide information about fluid tolerance or the state of venous congestion. Doppler ultrasound of the portal vein, specifically the portal pulsatility index (which under normal conditions presents as a continuous waveform due to the damping effects of the hepatic parenchyma and venous compliance), has been proposed as a non-invasive marker of systemic venous congestion. Studies have shown that an increase in the portal pulsatility index following volume loading may indicate the development of venous congestion and, therefore, poor fluid tolerance. Since the tidal volume challenge transiently increases intrathoracic pressure and allows dynamic evaluation of cardiovascular responses, we propose that this interaction be assessed not only through arterial dynamic indices (which assess responsiveness) but also through changes in venous flow patterns-specifically, variations in portal pulsatility-so that both fluid responsiveness and tolerance can be predicted with the same test.
Primary outcome measures
- The absolute change in the portal pulsatility index measured in critically ill patients immediately before and after an incraese of voclumen tidal (6 to 8 ml/kg) . Measurements will be obtained using Doppler ultrasonography in vena porta. [Time frame: Measured immediately before and after the tidal volume challenge (1 minute).]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- To correlate changes in portal pulsatility during the test with clinical signs of fluid intolerance (e.g., acute kidney injury, pulmonary congestion). [Time frame: Assessed during the first 48 hours post-challenge.]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
Participants must meet all of the following:
Age ≥ 18 years at the time of enrollment.
Receiving controlled mechanical ventilation with a baseline tidal volume of 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight.
Clinical indication for assessment of fluid responsiveness.
Adequate acoustic window for ultrasound visualization of the portal vein.
Exclusion criteria
Participants will be excluded if they have any of the following:
Liver cirrhosis.
Right heart failure, defined as any of the following on prior echocardiography:
Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) < 16 mm
S' wave < 10 cm/s
Right ventricular fractional area change < 35%
Left heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%).
Intra-abdominal hypertension.
Atrial fibrillation or other significant cardiac arrhythmias.
Tricuspid regurgitation.
Poor echogenic window preventing adequate ultrasound assessment.
Presence of spontaneous breathing activity.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07131228 · DrNegrinUH0000