Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07129577

Point of Care Testing in Emergency Departments After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Observational Injuries, Head Traumatic Brain Injuries

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Injuries, Head, Traumatic Brain Injuries. Basic parameters: 18 years — 100 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Point of Care Testing in Emergency Departments After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (POCkET)

Overview

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is estimated to have the highest incidence of all common neurological disorders, affecting 50 to 60 million people worldwide each year. In the UK, approximately one million people attend an Emergency Department (ED) annually following a head injury, and 80-90% of these are classified as mild TBI (mTBI), also referred to as concussion. In the acute setting, mTBI is typically defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13-15 on presentation. Current acute management focuses primarily on identifying which patients require a CT head scan to detect life threatening injuries that may need neurosurgical intervention, observation, or neurocritical care. However, there is increasing recognition that the term "mild" can be misleading. Many patients, including those with normal CT scans,experience persistent functional, cognitive, and symptomatic deficits that may benefit from further intervention and follow-up care. Blood biomarkers offer significant potential to improve the early diagnosis, risk stratification, and prognostication of mTBI in the ED setting. While these biomarkers are increasingly being developed and evaluated in moderate and severe TBI, their clinical utility in mild TBI has not yet been definitively demonstrated. To fully assess their potential value, it is essential to understand the current care pathways for mTBI in the ED, how they are implemented in practice, and where biomarker information could meaningfully enhance clinical decision making and improve patient outcomes. The POCKET study will use a systems engineering approach, in combination with health economic evaluation, to assess the potential role and utility of point-of-care blood biomarkers in the management of mild TBI in UK emergency departments. This research will be conducted using the Abbott biomarker platform.

Primary outcome measures

  • Understanding of the current clinical pathway and how use of point of care biomarkers may change this. [Time frame: From enrolment to 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (≥ 18 years of age)
  • Glasgow Coma Score >12
  • Presentation within 24 hours of head injury
  • Meet criteria to be assessed using NICE NG232 clinical decision support tool (CDST).
  • Patients with a prior history of TBI may still be included.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participant without capacity and no available patient legal representative or professional consultee.
  • Participant with capacity unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Unable to adequately understand written and verbal English.
  • Prisoners currently in custody of HM Prison Service

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07129577 · IRAS 353032

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗