DESIR. Evaluation of the Pre-therapeutic Activity of Dihydropyrimidine dEShydrogenase (DPD) in Patients With Cancer and/or Renal Failure
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: blood sampling, Blood sampling.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Renal Impairment, Digestive Cancers, Breast Cancer. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Evaluation of the Pre-therapeutic Activity of Dihydropyrimidine dEShydrogenase (DPD) in Patients With Cancer and/or Renal Failure
Overview
Fluoropyrimidine drugs (5-Fluorouracil or 5-FU and its prodrug capecitabine) are a widely used in the treatment of numerous solid tumors in adults. Approximately 85% of administered 5-FU is rapidly catabolized in the liver into inactive dihydrofluorouracil (5-FUH2) by dihydro-pyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), leaving only a small fraction of the initial drug for an eventual transformation into cytotoxic metabolites. Impeded DPD activity is associated to an increase of cytotoxic metabolites leading to potentially very severe toxicities. To prevent these toxicities, a pre-therapeutic measurement of plasma uracil can help assess DPD activity. Indeed, uracil is an endogenous substrate of DPD and an increase in its plasma concentration may be associated with a decrease in DPD activity. In this case, a reduction of the fluoropyrimidine dose is suggested. However, the investigators observed that uracilemia increased concomitantly to the severity of renal impairment. There are two possible explanations for this observation. Either the renal impairment reduces the renal elimination of uracil from blood, or DPD activity is actually impaired. In both cases, this can explain an increase in plasma uracil concentration. However, the impact on fluoropyrimidine dosage is different in the two cases. If the increase in uracilemia is due to renal impairment, DPD activity remains unaffected and there is no need to reduce the fluoropyrimidine dose. If DPD activity is actually impaired, a reduction in the fluoropyrimidine dose is required. In cases of renal impairment, uracilemia may therefore not be as relevant for DPD assessment as in the absence of renal impairment. To assess if DPD activity is actually impede during renal impairment, the DPD activity of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) will be assessed together with uracilemia in patients with or without renal impairment. As uracilemia decreases after dialysis, the DPD activity of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) will also be assessed in patient before and after dialysis. Four groups of 50 patients will be studied: patients with normal renal function with hyperuracilemia (uracilemia ≥ 16 ng/mL) or normal uracilemia (uracilemia \< 16 ng/mL) ; and patients with renal impairment with hyperuracilemia (uracilemia ≥ 16 ng/mL) or normal uracilemia (uracilemia \< 16 ng/mL). The main objective of the study is to describe the distribution of DPD activity in these four populations. The secondary objectives are to determine in normorenal patients the optimal threshold for DPD activity in non-deficient patients, allowing differentiation between deficient and non-deficient patients based on uracilemia ; and to describe in patients with impaired renal function the distribution of uracilemia with respect to the threshold previously described with the aim of verifying the relevance of uracilemia as a marker of DPD activity in such patients.
Interventions
- Diagnostic test blood sampling
DPD Activity wil be assessed from blood samples - Diagnostic test Blood sampling
Measurement of uracilemia and assessment of renal function
Primary outcome measures
- DPD Activity measurement in blood [Time frame: 3 years]
- Uracilemia in plasma [Time frame: 3 years]
- uracilemia-based DPD activity measurement [Time frame: 3 years]
- assessment of renal function using eGFR [Time frame: 3 years]
- sex [Time frame: 3 years]
- Age [Time frame: 3 years]
- creatininemia [Time frame: 3 years]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Signed written informed consent
- Affiliation to the Social Security System
- Patients with breast or digestive cancer for whom a fluoroptmidine therapy is being considered
- OR Patients on dialysis (GFR < 10 ml/min/1.73 m²)
- OR Nephrology patients with IR
Exclusion criteria
- Patient with anemia < 8.5 g/dl
- Patient with LDH > 2 x > ULN
- Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
- Subject without health insurance
- Subject in the exclusion period of another study or in the "national volunteer file"
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-only
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07124403 · 2024/907