Neurofeedback to Reduce Spontaneous Recovery of Threat Expectancy

Exposure therapy remains the most effective evidence-based treatment for a variety of anxiety related disorders; however, fear often returns over time. Pavlovian conditioning and extinction serve as a laboratory model for threat learning and exposure therapy, respectively. Studies utilizing these tasks can help uncover why exposure therapy fails to prevent the return of fear in some individuals. Pilot data suggest that there are specific behavioral phenotypes that individuals exhibit during a test of spontaneous recovery following Pavlovian acquisition and extinction. Specifically, some participants exhibit high spontaneous recovery, despite previously extinguishing their responses. The investigators hypothesize that individuals that exhibit this behavioral phenotype are also individuals for whom exposure therapy would be ineffective. These distinct phenotypes are also associated with different forms of computational inference, as revealed by fitting latent-cause inference models to behavioral data. In the case of individuals that exhibit high spontaneous recovery, latent cause inference modeling suggests that these participants are reinstating a latent cause associated with initial threat learning, which was protected from updating by the formation of a new cause during extinction.

A separate line of work has focused on understanding the behavioral consequences and neural mechanisms of voluntary thought suppression, or inhibitory memory control. This is the process through which an individual can suppress a memory to reduce the influence that it has over future cognition and emotion. The neural mechanisms of retrieval inhibition are well known and involve top-down inhibition from the right dorsal-lateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) to the hippocampus.

Here, the investigators aim to test the hypothesis that memory control ability is related to latent cause inference during Pavlovian conditioning and extinction, and by extension is related to spontaneous recovery. The goal of this project is to causally test this hypothesis by using real-time fMRI to directly strengthen individuals' memory control ability. Real-time fMRI (rt-fMRI) neurofeedback is a powerful tool that allows participants to modulate their own neural activity based on external cues (akin to biofeedback). Here, the investigators will provide participants feedback designed to help them increase their memory control ability. Specifically, the investigators will give participants positive feedback whenever the investigators detect negative dlPFC-hippocampal functional connectivity, which is the putative neural signature of successful memory inhibition. A control group will also be included, which will involve the delivery of sham placebo neurofeedback. The investigators predict that, following rt-fMRI neurofeedback, participants who received active neurofeedback aimed at increasing memory control will exhibit lower spontaneous recovery in a Pavlovian conditioning task compared to the control group.

• Neurofeedback learning [Time frame: Second and third fMRI sessions (out of four total fMRI sessions). At most 60 days will elapse between the start of data collection for a participant and their final fMRI session.]