Menu
Recruiting NCT07120659

Vacuum Massage vs Tactile Massage for the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain

No phase Interventional Chronic Neck Pain

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: soft touch massage, vacuum massage.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Chronic Neck Pain. Basic parameters: 21 years — 75 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Norway
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Vacuum Massage vs Tactile Massage for the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Investigating Pain Mechanisms.

Overview

Chronic pain significantly impacts individuals and society, with about 30% of Norwegian adults affected, making it the leading cause of long-term sick leave and disability benefits. Concerns over addiction to pain medications highlight the need for non-pharmacological treatments, though many such therapies, often complementary or alternative, are not widely available in conventional healthcare. Unclear biomechanisms of these therapies pose challenges for clinical trials and acceptance. This pilot study aims to explore the effects of two types of massage-cupping massage (CM, intense) and tactile massage (TM, soft)-on chronic neck pain, focusing on their mechanisms of action. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) will be used as a biomarker to assess changes in the pain pathway. A previous feasibility study on CM and QST conducted in Germany informs this research. The study will recruit 60 patients with chronic neck pain, randomized to CM or TM, with six weekly treatment sessions. QST will be measured before and after treatment to understand therapy-induced changes in the pain pathway. Findings will help tailor massage therapies to individual needs, improve clinical trial quality, and promote the integration of non-pharmacological treatments into conventional care, benefiting a large population in need.

Detailed description

Chronic pain imposes a severe burden for the individuals suffering from it as well as for society. A report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health from April 2019 summarizes that "Chronic pain affects about 30 per cent of the adult Norwegian population and is the most common reason for long-term sick leave and disability benefit". At the same time there is increasing awareness, that the potential for addiction for some of the pain medications has become a serious public health challenge as well. Thus, there is an urgent need for non-pharmacological interventions, however, most of these interventions belong to the spectrum of complementary and alternative medicine and are often not available through the conventional healthcare system. The fact that the biomechanisms for many of these therapies are unclear, imposes a challenge for the conduction of clinical trials as well as for the acceptance of theses complementary therapies. Thus, the aim of this randomized controlled pilot study is to investigate the effect of massage on chronic neck pain with regard to their mechanism of action. Two types of massage, cupping massage (CM, intense) vs tactile massage (TM, soft) are compared, which differ regarding the intensity of skin receptor stimulation. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) of the pain pathway will be used as a psychophysiological, mechanistic biomarker. Complete QST has rarely been used to evaluate complementary therapies for chronic pain, however a NFR funded feasibility pilot study (case series) on cupping massage and QST has recently been conducted in Jena, Germany, by this group of applicants. The current study will produce pilot data on QST that can be used for sample size estimation in a future clinical trial. A total of n=60 patients with chronic neck pain will be recruited and randomized to either CM or TM. Patients will receive a total of 6 treatment sessions once per week. QST will be measured before and after the treatment. Since QST can describe therapy induced changes in the neuronal pain pathway, it will contribute fundamentally to our understanding of the mechanisms of action of massage and related interventions. This will i) help to tailor massage therapy to the individual needs of patients and thus improve care ii) which will in turn enhance the quality of clinical trials and iii) foster the acceptance of non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of pain, which may iv) support their integration into conventional care and make these therapies available for the rather large population in need.

Interventions

  • Other soft touch massage
    Soft superficial massage which follows the anatomy of the body without penetrating into the deeper tissues
  • Other vacuum massage
    Intense stimulation through suction of the skin and deeper layers

Primary outcome measures

  • Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) [Time frame: The measurement will take about 2 hours in total; pre and post intervention (5-6 weeks)]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Numerical pain scale [Time frame: Takes about 20 seconds for the numeric rating scale; pre vs. post intervention (ca. 5-6 weeks)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • suffer from non-specific neck pain persisting at least 3 months
  • mean pain intensity ≥ 50 on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (NRS) with "0" meaning "no pain" and "100" meaning "worst pain imaginable"

Exclusion criteria

  • neurological symptoms
  • having had a vertebral column surgery less than 12 months prior to the study,
  • have received TENS, acupuncture, osteopathy, or a chiropractic maneuver or infiltration at the area within 4 weeks prior to the inclusion in the study
  • suffer from a congenital deformation of the spine.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Other

Study locations

Norway · 1 center
  • UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Institute of Community Medicine, National Research C — Tromsø

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07120659 · Ethics (REK) number 883588 · Application 2023-51

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗