Menu
Recruiting NCT07095946

Effectiveness of Intraligament vs IANB Anesthesia in Children Using Electronic Syringe

No phase Interventional Effectiveness of Anesthesia Using Electronic Syringe in Children in the Context of Endotopy Treatment

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Electronic Syringe Intraligament Technique, Electronic syringe IANB Technique.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Effectiveness of Anesthesia Using Electronic Syringe in Children in the Context of Endotopy Treatment. Basic parameters: 6 years — 10 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Syria
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparing the Effectiveness of the Intraligament Anesthesia Technique With the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Technique Using the Electronic Syringe in Children: A Random Clinical Study

Overview

This randomized clinical study aims to evaluate the efficacy and pain response of two local anesthesia techniques in pediatric dental treatment using an electronic syringe: ligament anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). The study applies both techniques to the same sample, where each child undergoes pulpectomy for two different teeth, each under the influence of a different anesthesia technique, during two separate visits. This study comes in the context of technological advancements in dentistry, which led to the development of computerized syringes as an alternative to traditional syringes. These devices are characterized by precise control of the anesthetic flow rate, as well as containing musical and auditory systems aimed at distracting the child and reducing feelings of fear and anxiety associated with dental treatment. Additionally, computerized syringes provide audible indicators showing the amount of anesthetic injected and support multiple injection modes such as rapid injection, slow injection, and ligament injection, allowing for more efficient and comfortable anesthetic delivery. Pain intensity will be assessed during three stages of the treatment procedure: during anesthesia administration, during placement of the rubber dam, and during opening of the pulp chambers. Post-procedure pain will also be evaluated using an age-appropriate validated pain scale, along with assessing the satisfaction level of both the children and their parents regarding the use of the electronic syringe as an alternative anesthesia tool. These combined measures aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the child's experience during dental treatment and contribute to improving anesthesia practices in pediatric dentistry.

Interventions

  • Device Electronic Syringe Intraligament Technique
    Use of an electronic syringe device to deliver local anesthesia using the periodontal ligament (PDL) technique in pediatric dental patients
  • Device Electronic syringe IANB Technique
    Use of an electronic syringe device to deliver local anesthesia via the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Technique in pediatric dental patients

Primary outcome measures

  • Success rate of electronic syringe anesthesia in pediatric dental procedures [Time frame: During procedure (From the start of ligation anesthesia (30 seconds) and block anesthesia (3 to 5 minutes) until reaching the stage of pulp chamber opening)]
  • Success rate of anesthesia technique [Time frame: During procedure (From the start of ligation anesthesia (30 seconds) and block anesthesia (3 to 5 minutes) until reaching the stage of pulp chamber opening.)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Cooperative children based on Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (Positive or Definitely Positive)
  • No clinical signs or symptoms indicating irreversible pulpitis
  • No periodontal ligament inflammation of the tooth to be treated
  • Children aged between 5 and 9 years
  • Children without systemic health problems

Exclusion criteria

  • Children who are uncooperative based on Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (Negative or Definitely Negative)
  • Presence of spontaneous or nocturnal pain
  • Clinical signs and symptoms indicating irreversible pulpitis
  • Presence of periodontal ligament inflammation of the treated tooth
  • Child age older than 10 years or younger than 3 years
  • Children with systemic health problems

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Crossover
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Syria · 1 center
  • Faculty of Pediatric Dentistry, Tishreen University — Latakia

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07095946 · PED-DENT-Tishreen-University

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗