Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07091331

3D-printed Ceromer Crowns Versus Stainless Steel in Posterior Primary Molars

No phase Interventional Caries, Dental Caries; Dentin Dental Caries in Children

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Personalized 3D-printed pediatric ceromer crown, Prefabricated stainless steel crown group.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Caries, Dental, Caries; Dentin, Dental Caries in Children. Basic parameters: 4 years — 9 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Mexico
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Clinical Evaluation of 3D-printed Ceromer Crowns Versus Stainless Steel in Posterior Primary Molars

Overview

The aim of the study is to compare preformed metal crowns and 3D-printed ceromer crowns in primary molars of 4-9 years old children. The main questions it aims to answer are: * How does 3D-printed ceromer crowns compare clincally to stainless steel crowns when restoring posterior molars? * What is the level of satisfaction of the patient with both materials? * What is the level of parental satisfaction with both materials? Study methodology: This study is a split-mouth clinical trial where participants will receive at least one of each materials in different quadrants of the mouth.

Detailed description

This randomized clinical trial is designed following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines and will adopt a prospective, split-mouth approach. The objective is to compare the clinical performance of crowns fabricated with three-dimensional (3D) printed ceromer material against conventional preformed stainless steel crowns in extensively decayed primary posterior teeth. The unit of observation will be gingival inflammation in the area surrounding the restorations, evaluated at specific time points over a 12-month follow-up period (3, 6 and 12 months).

Each eligible participant will receive both types of crowns, with assignments made to contralateral quadrants of the mouth to allow for within-subject comparison. This methodology minimizes inter-individual variability and strengthens internal validity. The ceromer crowns will be fabricated via additive manufacturing (3D printing), while the stainless steel crowns will follow the conventional selection and crimping technique.

Written informed consent will be obtained from their guardians or parents. An expected total of 50 primary molars of healthy participants will be restored.

Interventions

  • Procedure Personalized 3D-printed pediatric ceromer crown
    After primary molar crown preparation, digital impression using intraoral scanner (i700, Medit, Seoul, South Korea), crown will be designed with CAD software (CliniCAD, medit, South Korea) and fabricated using a 3D printer, (Sonic mini 4k, Phrozen, Taipei, Taiwan). Crown will be cemented by passive seating using a self-adhesive dual cure cement (Beauticem, shofu, San Marcos, CA, USA)
  • Device Prefabricated stainless steel crown group
    Stainless steel crown application: After preparation of the tooth, the crown will be filled and cemented with type-1 glass ionomer cement (Ketac Cem easymix, 3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA)

Primary outcome measures

  • Plaque index (PI) (Silness and Loe, 1964) [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Gingival Index (GI) (Loe & Silness, 1963) [Time frame: 12 months]
  • International Dental Federation (FDI) criteria used for clinical evaluation of indirect restorations [Time frame: 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Patient satisfaction [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Parental satisfaction [Time frame: 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 4 to 9 years with at least 2 primary molars affected by deep occlusoproximal caries.
  • Teeth may require pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulpectomy) and be suitable for full-coverage restoration.
  • Teeth must have an antagonist and be located in opposing hemiarches.
  • The affected primary molars must be expected to remain in the mouth for at least 12 months.
  • The child must be in general good health.
  • Parents or legal guardians must sign informed consent, and the child must provide assent.
  • Patient does not come to control appointment or does not want to continue research.

Exclusion criteria

  • Children with systemic diseases or medical conditions affecting oral health.
  • Uncooperative behavior (Frankl scale 3 or 4).
  • Temporomandibular joint disorders or parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism).
  • Absence of antagonist or adjacent teeth in the selected quadrants.
  • Children on long-term medication.
  • Patient with allergy to local anesthetic, nickel or chromium.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Mexico · 1 center
  • Facultad de Odontología — Tijuana

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07091331 · 2735

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗