Menu
Recruiting NCT07089953

Patient Perception of Physician's Compassion, Communication Skills, and Professionalism During Clinic Visits: a Randomized Controlled Trial (EHR Study #3)

No phase Interventional Communication Skills Professionalism Randomized Controlled Trial Perception

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Questionnaire, Video.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Communication Skills, Professionalism, Randomized Controlled Trial, Perception. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

To learn about how patients view a doctor's compassion, communication skills, and professionalism based on whether the doctor uses the Electronic Health Record (EHR) during a visit with a patient.

Detailed description

Primary Objectives 1. To compare participants' perception of physicians' compassion after they watch two scripted-video vignettes of physicians: one portraying a traditional face to face clinical visit without the use of examination room computer, and the other one portraying a physician using an integrated model of EHR use for communication during the visit.

Secondary Objectives

1\. Study To compare participants' perception of physicians' communication skills after they watch two scripted-video vignettes of physicians: one portraying a traditional face to face clinical visit without examination room computer use, and the other one portraying a physician using an integrated model of EHR use during communication.

Interventions

  • Other Questionnaire
    Complete 3 questionnaires about your emotions and your trust in doctors.
  • Other Video
    Four (4) videos, each 4 minutes long, have been made for use in this study.

Primary outcome measures

  • Questionnaires/Videos [Time frame: Through study completion; an average of 1 year]

Eligibility criteria

Eligibility Criteria

  • Participants with a diagnosis of cancer either early disease or advanced cancer defined as locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.
  • Outparticipants (either new referrals or follow-ups) seen in the Supportive Care Clinic.
  • Age >/= 18 years old.
  • Able to read, write, and speak English.
  • Participants with normal cognitive status (Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) </= 6/30) who can understand the nature and purpose of the study and have the ability to complete the consent process.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants who are experiencing severe symptom distress, including severe emotional distress, which may interfere with study participation. This will be measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Eligibility of participants with ESAS score >/= 7 on any item will be determined by the principal investigator and/or attending physician who is caring for the patient during that visit.
  • Participants with cognitive dysfunction (Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) >/= 7/30 will be excluded from the study.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Health services research

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center — Houston

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07089953 · 2025-0651 · NCI-2025-05414

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗