Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07089771

Virtual Versus Dye-based Chromoendoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surveillance Colonoscopy

No phase Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Ulcerative Colitis (Disorder) Crohns Disease Colorectal Neoplasms

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Virtual Chromoendoscopy, Dye-Based Chromoendoscopy.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), Ulcerative Colitis (Disorder), Crohns Disease, Colorectal Neoplasms. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Sweden
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), such as ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease affecting the colon, have a higher risk of developing colon cancer over time. To catch early signs of cancer, regular colonoscopies are recommended. In this study, the investigators are comparing two advanced methods of examining the colon during these surveillance colonoscopies. One method uses a special dye sprayed inside the colon to highlight abnormal areas (called dye-based chromoendoscopy). The other method uses new technology built into the camera to enhance the view without needing any dye (called virtual chromoendoscopy). Both methods use modern, high-definition equipment. The purpose of this study is to find out if the newer, dye-free method is as good as the traditional dye method at detecting pre-cancerous changes (called dysplasia) in people with IBD. Adults with IBD who are due for a routine surveillance colonoscopy may be invited to take part. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two methods. No additional procedures are involved, and only the way the colon is viewed differs. The investigators will also look at how long the procedures take, how many biopsies are needed, any complications, and how patients experience the exam. Participants will be followed over time using national health records to check for long-term outcomes. This research will help doctors better understand which method is most effective and comfortable for patients, and may guide future recommendations for cancer screening in people with IBD.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial designed to compare the diagnostic performance of two high-definition endoscopic imaging techniques used during surveillance colonoscopy in patients with longstanding inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo colonoscopy using either a virtual (dye-free) chromoendoscopy method or a conventional dye-based chromoendoscopy technique. The primary objective is to evaluate whether virtual chromoendoscopy is non-inferior to dye- based chromoendoscopy in detecting dysplasia, a precancerous condition in the colon. Secondary outcomes include the number and type of lesions detected, predictive accuracy of targeted biopsies, examination times, patient-reported experience, complication rates, and biopsy frequency. Eligible participants are adults with a history of extensive colonic IBD of at least eight years, or additional high-risk factors such as primary sclerosing cholangitis or family history of colorectal cancer. Patients with previous colorectal cancer, prior colectomy, known untreated dysplasia, or contraindications to dye application will be excluded. All procedures will be performed using high-definition equipment and standardized bowel preparation protocols. The study includes long-term follow-up through national health registries to evaluate cancer outcomes and subsequent procedures at one and three years post-colonoscopy. The trial will be conducted across several academic and regional centers in Sweden, with an anticipated enrollment of approximately 480 patients to account for potential attrition. This study seeks to inform future guidelines by determining whether a less resource-intensive and potentially more patient-friendly method can provide equivalent surveillance efficacy in this high-risk population.

Interventions

  • Procedure Virtual Chromoendoscopy
    High-Definition Virtual Chromoendoscopy (HD-VCE): Surveillance colonoscopy using high-definition virtual chromoendoscopy enhances mucosal visualization through advanced imaging filters integrated into the colonoscope. This dye-free technique improves detection of dysplasia by increasing contrast and highlighting subtle mucosal patterns during withdrawal. HD-VCE reduces procedure time and eliminates risks related to dye application, offering a practical alternative to dye-based methods. Its effi
  • Procedure Dye-Based Chromoendoscopy
    High-Definition Dye-Based Chromoendoscopy (HD-DCE): Surveillance colonoscopy using high-definition dye-based chromoendoscopy involves segmental application of indigo carmine dye via a spray catheter. The dye enhances mucosal surface patterns, aiding dysplasia detection. HD-DCE is currently considered a gold standard in IBD surveillance due to superior dysplasia detection rates.

Primary outcome measures

  • Proportion of patients with at least one dysplastic lesion detected during surveillance colonoscopy [Time frame: Measured at the time of the index colonoscopy procedure (baseline) and confirmed by histopathological analysis post-procedure (up to 60 days)]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • Number of dysplastic lesions detected per 10 minutes of withdrawal time [Time frame: Measured during the index colonoscopy procedure.]
  • Positive predictive value (PPV) of targeted biopsies [Time frame: Measured during the index colonoscopy and confirmed by pathology.]
  • Type and characterization of detected lesions [Time frame: Assessed at the time of index colonoscopy and confirmed by pathology.]
  • Patient experience and satisfaction [Time frame: Collected within 24-48 hours after the colonoscopy procedure.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years and one of the criteria beneath:
  • Extensive ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis (IBD-U), or Crohn's colitis involving at least one-third of the colon, with a disease history of at least 8 years
  • IBD or IBD-U with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)
  • IBD or IBD-U with a family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative

Exclusion criteria

  • History of colorectal cancer or prior colectomy
  • Contraindications to dye use
  • Colonoscopies for therapeutic purposes
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to consent

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Diagnostic

Study locations

Sweden · 1 center
  • Karolinska University Hospital — Stockholm

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07089771 · 2025-02302-01

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗