Menu
Recruiting NCT07083076

Regular Diet Versus Extended Low Residue After Colon Surgery

No phase Interventional Colon Resection

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Short term (10 day) low residue diet restriction, 6 week low residue diet restriction.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Colon Resection. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Early Introduction of Regular Diet Versus Extended Low Residue Restriction After Colon Surgery

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a 10 day low-residue diet restriction is better for bowel function and quality of life without increasing complications compared to a 6 week low-residue diet restriction after elective colon resection surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does a shorter time period of low residue restriction result in a faster return to normal bowel function? Are there any differences in complication rate between a 10 day low-residue diet restriction compared to a 6 week low-residue diet restriction? Participants will be randomized to one of the two diet plans and will be asked to answer surveys about their bowel function and health care related quality of life at various time points for up to 3 months.

Detailed description

Patients who undergo colon resection surgery are often instructed to adhere to a low residue (low insoluble fiber) diet for at least the first 1-2 weeks after surgery. This approach is based on limited previous literature that associates stool burden in the first three to seven days and the risk of leakage from the new connection in the colon (anastomotic leakage). However, there is no clear consensus on how long this low residue diet should last, and low residue diets can negatively affect bowel function-related quality of life. The investigators hypothesize that resuming an unrestricted diet at an earlier time point (10 days) after surgery will improve bowel function-related quality of life without increasing the risk of leakage or other complications compared to a longer time point (6 weeks). Both time points are within the scope of practice, but many surgeons opt for the longer time point. To answer our hypothesis, the investigators plan to use validated survey instruments pre- and postoperatively (at within 2 weeks preoperatively then 1 week, 3 week, 6 week, and 3 months after the surgery) to assess patient's bowel function and health care-related quality of life. Patients will be consented preoperatively and randomized after their surgeries, no later than the day of discharge from the hospital. The participants will take a survey before surgery then have their surgery as the participants normally would. The participants will also have their post-surgery hospital care as normal and before discharge will be instructed on which diet plan the participants must follow (either 10 days or 6 weeks of low residue diet). Patients who have postoperative issues while in the hospital will be excluded, as the participants usually have different postoperative diet recommendations outside of the typical post-surgical pathway. Other than the surveys and different diet instructions, nothing else will change about their post-surgical care. The results of the surveys for each group will be evaluated in several ways. Summary statistics will be obtained to characterize both the intervention and control group. In addition, the pre and post-surgical results will be compared. Other information will be collected, such as demographic information and complication rate, that will be used to compare both groups as well. These results and the subsequent analysis will address our hypothesis and allow us to either recommend a 10-day period of low residue diet or confirm that the 6-week period is safer.

Interventions

  • Other Short term (10 day) low residue diet restriction
    Patients will have an unrestricted diet (as opposed to a low residue diet restriction) 10 days after surgery.
  • Other 6 week low residue diet restriction
    Patients will be restricted to a low residue diet for 6 weeks after surgery. After this period, their diet will be unrestricted.

Primary outcome measures

  • Return to baseline bowel function (Postoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score - Preoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score <=5) [Time frame: Preoperative to 3 months postoperative]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Bowel Function Related Quality of Life [Time frame: preoperative to 3 months postoperative]
  • Health Care Related Quality of Life [Time frame: preoperative to 3 months postoperative]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients who have elective colon resection with anastomosis

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who have an ostomy as part of their surgery
  • Patients who undergo emergency surgery
  • Patients who do not follow the enhanced recovery protocol (the standard postoperative protocol for patients undergoing elective colon resection)
  • Patients less than 18 years of age
  • Vulnerable populations: fetuses, pregnant women, children, cognitively impaired, hospital employees, students, healthy controls, prisoners, and other institutionalized individuals

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 2 centers
  • North Shore University Hospital — Manhasset
  • Long Island Jewish Hospital — New Hyde Park

Publications

  • Kawada K, Wada T, Yamamoto T, Itatani Y, Hida K, Obama K. Correlation between Colon Perfusion and Postoperative Fecal Output through a Transanal Drainage Tube during Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection. Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 8;14(9):2328. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092328. PMID 35565456
  • Lau C, Phillips E, Bresee C, Fleshner P. Early use of low residue diet is superior to clear liquid diet after elective colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):641-7; discussion 647-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000929. PMID 25203881
  • Vanhauwaert E, Matthys C, Verdonck L, De Preter V. Low-residue and low-fiber diets in gastrointestinal disease management. Adv Nutr. 2015 Nov 13;6(6):820-7. doi: 10.3945/an.115.009688. Print 2015 Nov. PMID 26567203
  • Blomquist P, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. The effect of relative bowel rest on healing of colonic anastomoses. Breaking strength and collagen in the colonic wall following left colon resection and anastomosis in the rat. Acta Chir Scand. 1984;150(8):671-5. PMID 6532041
  • Uden P, Blomquist P, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Influence of long-term relative bowel rest on the healing of a left colon anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988 Nov;31(11):886-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02554855. PMID 3180961
  • Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):922-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f1c21. PMID 22504191
  • He S, Zhang J, Wang R, Li L, Sun W, Wang J, Deng Y, Liang W, Dou R. Long-term Changes in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Survivors of Rectal Cancer: Longitudinal Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Jun 1;67(6):834-840. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Mar 1. PMID 38426539
  • Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160. PMID 1285753

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07083076 · 24-0448

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗