Menu
Enrolling by invitation NCT07078669

Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery

No phase Interventional Wound Closure Suture Materials

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Polyglactin 910 (Dyed), Polyglactin 910 (Undyed).
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Wound Closure, Suture Materials. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparison of Patient Outcomes With Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery

Overview

Purpose - This exploratory, split-wound study aims to evaluate the potential difference in skin reactions to two different types of sutures, dyed and undyed, used to close wounds after surgery. The study will assess whether dyed sutures to elicit increased tissue reactivity like redness, itching, and scarring and whether undyed sutures may be more optimal for wound healing and cosmetic response. Enrollment into the study and data collection is expected to take approximately 3-6 months. Follow-up visits will be chosen at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery, which is standard practice for monitoring healing and checking for complications such as infection or abnormal scarring. Primary Objective - The primary objective is to assess the response of wounds closed with both dyed and undyed sutures after cutaneous surgery to determine if there is a difference in wound healing and tissue reactivity with one compared to the other. Enrollment into the study and data collection is expected to take approximately 3-6 months. Follow-up visits will be chosen at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery, which is standard practice for monitoring healing and checking for complications such as infection or abnormal scarring.

Interventions

  • Device Polyglactin 910 (Dyed)
    Half the wound for each participant will be sutured using Polyglactin 910 suture dyed (violet) with colorants such as D\&C Violet No. 2 present.
  • Device Polyglactin 910 (Undyed)
    Half the wound for each participant will be sutured using Polyglactin 910 suture Undyed

Primary outcome measures

  • Clinical Erythema Assessment scale [Time frame: 2 weeks post-procedure]
  • Clinical Erythema Assessment scale [Time frame: 4 weeks post-procedure]
  • Clinical Erythema Assessment scale [Time frame: 3 months post-procedure]
  • Presence of Hypertrophic Scarring [Time frame: 2 weeks post-procedure]
  • Presence of Hypertrophic Scarring [Time frame: 4 weeks post-procedure]
  • Presence of Hypertrophic Scarring [Time frame: 3 months post-procedure]
  • Presence of Suture Extrusion [Time frame: 2 weeks post-procedure]
  • Presence of Suture Extrusion [Time frame: 4 weeks post-procedure]
  • Presence of Suture Extrusion [Time frame: 3 Months post-procedure]
  • Presence of Surgical Site Infection [Time frame: 2 weeks post-procedure]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who are scheduled for a standard of care surgical excision

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are unable to give informed consent

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Crossover
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • WVU Medicine Waynesburg Dermatology — Waynesburg

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07078669 · 2504138740

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗