Osseodensification vs Conventional Drilling for Immediate Dental Implant Placement
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Osseodensification burs, Conventional burs.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Immediate Dental Implant Placement, Conventional Drilling Technique, Osseodensification Drilling Technique. Basic parameters: 25 years — 45 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Lebanon
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Osseodensification vs Conventional Drilling for Immediate Dental Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Study
Overview
Aim of the study is to analyze and compare the characteristic differences occurring in the surrounding bone in an immediate implant placed by osseodensification to immediate implants placed with the conventional technique
Detailed description
A bifurcation inter-radicular bone of 2 mm or more in a none restorable lower molar will be needed in order to successfully be able to drill the bone with conventional or Osseo densification burs, followed by placing the implant at this site. A xenograft bone material will be used to fill the extraction socket and a customized temporary abutment using flowable composite and a silicone mold will be fabricated and placed over it after polishing it.
Interventions
- Other Osseodensification burs
Densah burs are osseodensification burs used to condense bone and prepare dental implant site, unlike conventional technique which cuts and removes the bone - Other Conventional burs
Preparation of dental implant site by the Conventional technique using Conventional burs that are subtractive
Primary outcome measures
- Interradicular bone width [Time frame: Intraoperative (at time of surgery)]
- Dental implant stability [Time frame: up to 4 months after dental implant placement]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
- Marginal Bone Level [Time frame: up to 7 months after the implantation]
- Bone density [Time frame: up to 7 months after dental implant placement]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patient age 25 to 45 years old
- Systemically and periodontally healthy individuals.
- Non-smokers or light smokers (Less than 5 cigarettes a day) (Schane 2010).
- Good oral hygiene.
- Healthy remaining dentition.
- Adequate quality and quantity of bone
- Interradicular septum ≥ 2 mm (Bleyan, 2022).
- Mandibular non-restorable molars.
- Type A or B socket (Smith and Tarnow, 2013).
Exclusion criteria
- Acute inflammation or infection in the implant region.
- Patients with mental disorders who could not cooperate with treatment or communicate normally.
- Patients who have severe systemic disorders (Uncontrolled Diabetes, Uncontrolled Hypertension, End stage kidney or liver diseases and Severe Heart diseases) .
- Poor oral hygiene.
- Active periodontal disease.
- Uncooperative patients, not willing to adhere to post-surgical instructions and follow up visits.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Lebanon · 1 center
- Beirut Arab University — Beirut
Publications
- https://omx.journals.ekb.eg/article_140845_40c7deeba68c3279a9d3dffaed37c3fd.pdf
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07077915 · 2025-H-0162-D-M-0696