Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07072923

Antibiotic Impregnated Beads in Osteomyelitis

Phase IV Interventional Osteomyelitis of the Foot Antibiotic Impregnated Beads Osteomyelitis of Lower Extremities

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads, Calcium sulfate beads (sham beads).
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Osteomyelitis of the Foot, Antibiotic Impregnated Beads, Osteomyelitis of Lower Extremities. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Utility of Antibiotic Impregnated Beads in Lower Extremity Osteomyelitis

Overview

Lower extremity bone infections, such as osteomyelitis, often occur after bone fractures, surgery, or when prosthetic joints or hardware become infected. Treatment usually includes antibiotics, chosen based on the infection's specifics. Options include intravenous (IV) or oral antibiotics, and sometimes local treatment with antibiotic-loaded beads placed directly at the infection site. Traditionally, these beads are made of non-absorbable materials, requiring a second surgery to remove them. However, a newer approach uses absorbable calcium sulfate beads, which can deliver higher antibiotic doses and don't need removal. This study will compare the use of IV and/or antibiotics in combination with absorbable antibiotic calcium sulfate beads with IV and/or oral antibiotics without absorbable beads, which serves as the current standard of care.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of absorbable antibiotic beads in treating lower extremity (LE) infections and compare it to the current standard care. The study has several objectives: (1) to compare treatment failure rates between patients receiving intravenous (IV) and/or oral antibiotics plus antibiotic loaded absorbable beads with IV and/or oral antibiotics plus beads without antibiotics (sham beads). The primary question to be answered is whether patients treated with oral and/or IV antibiotics in conjunction with absorbable antibiotic beads have outcome (failure rate) that is not higher than those treated with standard care alone. The study's hypothesis is that the failure rate for patients receiving IV and/or oral antibiotics combined with antibiotic beads will be non-inferior to those receiving the standard care of IV or oral antibiotics without beads. The study will primarily focus on treatment failure rates as a key endpoint to measure effectiveness and compare the two treatment approaches.

Interventions

  • Drug Antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads
    Calcium sulfate beads will be loaded with best available antibiotics based on surgeon/infectious disease specialist determination from the following options (vancomycin, daptomycin, cefazolin, cefepime, tobramycin, amphotericin B, micafungin, and voriconazole).
  • Device Calcium sulfate beads (sham beads)
    Calcium sulfate beads will be prepared without added antibiotics and placed during the second surgery.

Primary outcome measures

  • End of Therapy - Clinical Failure [Time frame: End of Therapy (usually 4-6 weeks)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with lower extremity osteoarticular infections with or without hardware

Exclusion criteria

  • patients who are hemodynamically unstable or have altered mental status and cannot give consent
  • patient per investigators discretion are excluded

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07072923 · STUDY00005515

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗