Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07062705

Progressive Inhibition of Neuromuscular Structure and Neural Tissue Mobilization.

No phase Interventional Lumbar Radiculopathy

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Progressive Inhibition of Neuromuscular Structure, Neural Tissue Mobilization..
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Lumbar Radiculopathy. Basic parameters: 18 years — 40 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Pakistan
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparative Effects of Neural Tissue Mobilization and Progressive Inhibition of Neuromuscular Structure (PINS) Technique on Pain, Range and Disability in Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy.

Overview

Lumbar radiculopathy is a neuromusculoskeletal condition that is characterized as radiating pain in the leg described as electric, burning, or sharp, and is associated with dermatomal or myotomal differences and tendon reflex abnormalities. Neural mobilization is a manual therapy technique designed to alleviate nerve pain and dysfunction by gently mobilizing the nerve along its pathway. The Progressive Inhibition of Neuromuscular Structures (PINS) technique is a therapeutic approach that aims to reduce pain and muscle tension by sequentially applying pressure to specific points along a muscle or nerve pathway. This study focuses on pain, range of motion and disability with these techniques in patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

Detailed description

This study will be a randomized controlled trial and will be conducted in Hassan healthcare centre Gujrat. Non-probability conveninet sampling technique will be used to collect the data. Sample size of 48 subjects (per group 16) with age group between 18-40 years will be taken. Individuals having radiculopathy at level of L5-S1 (unilateral radiculopathy) and pain in the distribution of sciatic nerve (leg-dominant symptoms). Outcome measure will be taken using Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Sciatica Bothersomeness Index (SBI), Goniometer. An informed consent will be taken. Subjects will be selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria and will be equally divided into three groups. Both the Groups will receive Hot Pack, lumbar stabilization including curl ups and side bridging and stretching include hamstring stretch and piriformis stretch. Group A will receive PINS technique as per Dowling's guidelines. Group 2 will receive Neural mobilization technique. Groyup 3 will receive both PINS and neural mobilization technique. Outcome measures will be measured at baseline and after 4 weeks. Each group (both single and combined) will receive two treatments per week for 30 min each, for 4 weeks. Data analysis will be done by SPSS version 26.

Interventions

  • Other Progressive Inhibition of Neuromuscular Structure
    The index fingers of both hands were used to palpate two connected locations, referred to as main and endpoints. The locations were located along a neuromuscular structure and were the most and least sensitive sections, respectively. Once an endpoint (region of least sensitivity) was identified, the index finger of one hand was used to provide a moderate ischemia compression; the pressure was kept constant until the course of therapy was finished. After identifying the primary point-the area of
  • Other Neural Tissue Mobilization.
    The patient sat well back on the end of a plinth with thighs fully supported. The patient was asked to slump. Overpressure was applied to the lumbar and thoracic flexion in attempt to bow the spine rather than the hips. With spinal flexion position maintained, the patient was asked to bend his chin to chest and then overpressure in the same direction was added. The patient was asked to extend his knee actively. The patient was asked to dorsiflex his ankle. The therapist was maintaining the ankle

Primary outcome measures

  • NUMERIC PAIN RATING SCALE (NPRS): [Time frame: 4 weeks]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX (ODI): [Time frame: 4 weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age group between 18 and 40 years(.
  • Both gender male and female.
  • Participants diagnosed as having a chronic (lasting three months or longer) lumbar radiculopathy.
  • Diagnosed patient of having radiculopathy at level of L4-L5 and L5-S1 lesion (unilateral radiculopathy).
  • Radiating pain evoked by specific clinical tests, including slump and straight leg raise.

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals having bilateral lumbar radiculopathy.
  • Spondylolysis/spondylolisthesis
  • Mechanical systemic low back pain or neoplasmic and infectious processes.
  • Participants with severe nerve root compression (non-ambulant/wheelchair-bound).
  • Any sign or symptom of dementia or other cognitive impairments.
  • Diagnosis of claudication, previous spinal surgery, pregnancy and presence of any of the spinal red flags.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Pakistan · 1 center
  • Hassan Health Care Centre, Gujrat — Dhok Gujra

Publications

  • Olofson E, Gerona C, Estrada A, Duong J. Joint and Neural Mobilization for Pain Reduction in Radiculopathy Patients: Azusa Pacific University; 2023.
  • Malik A, Ramsha M, Samad A. Outcomes of the butler neural mo-bilization technique and manual therapy for chronic low back pain in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: A cross-sectional comparative study. J Basic Clin Med Sci. 2022;1:3-11
  • Divyasree S, Kumaresan A, Vishnuram S. Effect of Mckenzie lumbar extension exercise with TENS on lumbar radiculopathy. Biomedicine. 2023;43(3):1032-5.
  • Danazumi MS, Ibrahim SU. Effectiveness of Progressive Inhibition of Neuromuscular Structures (PINS) and Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) in Lumbar Disk Herniation with Radiculopathy: A Case Report with Two Year Follow-up.
  • Takla MK. Alterations of static and dynamic balance in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy. 2019;24:49-55.
  • Kim KH, Leem MJ, Yi TI, Kim JS, Yoon SY. Balance Ability in Low Back Pain Patients With Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Evaluated With Tetrax: A Matched Case-Control Study. Ann Rehabil Med. 2020 Jun;44(3):195-202. doi: 10.5535/arm.19101. Epub 2020 May 29. PMID 32475097
  • Das S, Dowle P, Iyengar R. Effect of spinal mobilization with leg movement as an adjunct to neural mobilization and conventional therapy in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Sci Res. 2018;6(1):11-9.
  • Bello B, Danazumi MS, Kaka B. Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Manual Therapy Techniques in the Management of Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Chiropr Med. 2019 Dec;18(4):253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2019.10.006. Epub 2020 Sep 3. PMID 32952470

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07062705 · REC/RCR & AHS/24/0168

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗