Effects of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage on Cerebral Hemodynamics

This pilot interventional study explores the physiological and clinical impact of continuous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage via lumbar drain on cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in patients with acute ischemic stroke who exhibit hemodynamic failure, as measured by blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI.

Background and Rationale In patients with acute ischemic stroke, failure of autoregulatory capacity and exhaustion of cerebrovascular reserve represent major contributors to secondary ischemic injury and poor outcomes. Despite optimal medical management, patients with documented hemodynamic failure remain at high risk for recurrent ischemic stroke, often exceeding 30-40% within the first months post-event.

BOLD-CVR is a non-invasive MRI-based technique that maps the cerebrovascular response to a vasodilatory stimulus (commonly CO₂ or breath-hold induced hypercapnia). When interpreted using standardized processing pipelines, it offers a quantitative assessment of cerebral hemodynamics and can differentiate between regions with preserved, reduced, or exhausted vascular reserve. In previous research, a hemispheric mean BOLD-CVR ≤ 0.1041 or a middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory mean BOLD-CVR ≤ 0.0778 has been associated with hemodynamic failure stage 2 (HF2).

There is preliminary evidence from other neurological conditions (e.g., idiopathic intracranial hypertension, traumatic brain injury, and subarachnoid hemorrhage) that CSF diversion through lumbar drainage can lead to improved cerebral perfusion and functional outcomes. The proposed mechanism involves a transient reduction in intracranial pressure (ICP), improved compliance, and favorable shifts in cerebral perfusion pressure gradients. However, this strategy has not been evaluated in the context of acute ischemic stroke in patients without hydrocephalus but with severe autoregulatory impairment.

This study hypothesizes that temporary CSF drainage in such patients will improve BOLD-CVR as an imaging marker of vascular reserve and possibly influence clinical outcomes.

Study Objectives

Primary Objective:

To assess whether continuous CSF drainage via lumbar drain results in measurable improvement of cerebrovascular reactivity (BOLD-CVR) in acute ischemic stroke patients with HF2.

Secondary Objectives:

To evaluate the safety and technical feasibility of lumbar drain placement in acute stroke patients without hydrocephalus.

To explore changes in neurological function (NIH Stroke Scale and modified Rankin Scale) at discharge and during follow-up.

To monitor for recurrent ischemic stroke events during the subacute period post-intervention.

To compare observed CVR changes with those occurring naturally over time in a historical cohort with matched inclusion criteria but no CSF drainage.

Study Design and Methodology This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, pilot interventional trial. Patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke will undergo BOLD-CVR MRI within a defined time window (typically within 3-7 days post-event) to assess cerebrovascular reserve.

Inclusion criteria require radiologically confirmed acute ischemic stroke and a BOLD-CVR profile consistent with HF2. Patients with hydrocephalus, mass effect, active CNS infection, or contraindications to lumbar puncture are excluded.

Intervention: Eligible and consenting patients will undergo placement of a lumbar drain by experienced neurosurgical staff. Continuous drainage will be performed over a period of 48-72 hours using a pressure-controlled closed CSF system. Drainage volumes and pressures will be recorded in standardized templates.

Imaging Protocol: BOLD-CVR imaging will be performed at two time points:

Baseline scan: prior to lumbar drainage.

Follow-up scan: 12-24 hours after completion of drainage.

All imaging will be performed on the same scanner with identical acquisition parameters and stimulus paradigm (e.g., breath-hold or fixed hypercapnic challenge with end-tidal CO₂ monitoring). Data will be processed using a standardized, validated CVR quantification pipeline incorporating motion correction, physiological noise regression, and voxelwise modeling of the BOLD signal in response to the vasoactive stimulus.

Control Strategy: Historical Comparison Given the exploratory and interventional nature of this study, a randomized control group is not feasible within this pilot phase. Instead, a historical control cohort will be utilized to contextualize observed changes in BOLD-CVR following lumbar drainage.

The historical cohort includes previously scanned acute ischemic stroke patients with HF2 profiles who underwent BOLD-CVR MRI at two time points (typically 3-7 days apart) but without any interventional procedure between scans. These patients were matched for age, vascular risk factors, infarct location, and NIHSS at baseline.

This allows for a comparison of temporal BOLD-CVR changes occurring naturally in similar patients, thereby enabling preliminary inference about the causal effect of CSF drainage on CVR dynamics.

Outcome Measures

Primary Endpoint:

Change in mean hemispheric and/or MCA-territory BOLD-CVR between pre- and post-drainage imaging.

Secondary Endpoints:

Incidence of adverse events related to lumbar drain (e.g., headache, infection, CSF leak).

Change in NIHSS from baseline to discharge.

Change in mRS at 3-month follow-up.

Incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke within 90 days.

Statistical and Analytical Considerations Given the exploratory nature of this pilot study, no formal power calculation has been performed. However, a target sample size of 10-15 interventional cases has been selected based on feasibility and expected enrollment rates.

Statistical approach:

Pre/post comparisons will be performed using paired statistical tests (e.g., Wilcoxon signed-rank or paired t-test depending on normality) to evaluate changes in BOLD-CVR.

The historical cohort (n ≈ 20-30) will serve as a reference distribution. Between-group comparisons will use mixed-effects models or ANCOVA adjusting for baseline CVR and time between scans.

Exploratory ROC and AUC analyses will be conducted to evaluate whether baseline CVR thresholds predict benefit from CSF drainage.

Adverse event rates and tolerability measures will be reported descriptively.

Missing data will be handled using appropriate methods (e.g., multiple imputation or last observation carried forward), depending on extent and distribution.

Technical Considerations BOLD-CVR acquisition will use echo-planar imaging sequences optimized for T2\*-sensitivity, with whole-brain coverage and temporal resolution ≤2s.

Stimulus control will be ensured via synchronized end-tidal gas monitoring or standardized breath-hold timing via visual cueing.

• Comparison of BOLD-CVR Change Between Intervention Group and Historical Control Cohort [Time frame: From baseline MRI (day 0) to follow-up MRI (day 2-3) in both intervention and historical control cohorts]
• Immediate Hemodynamic Impact of Acute CSF Withdrawal on BOLD-CVR [Time frame: Second BOLD-CVR performed within 30 minutes after post-drainage MRI (typically day 2)]
• Incidence of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke [Time frame: From study enrollment to 90 days post-stroke]
• Incidence of Lumbar Drain-Related Complications [Time frame: From drain placement to 7 days post-removal or hospital discharge, whichever occurs later]
• Hemodynamic Parameters Associated With Lumbar Drainage [Time frame: From baseline (pre-drainage) to 48 hours post-drainage completion]
• Neurological and Functional Outcomes at 3 Months as measured using the To evaluate clinical recovery after intervention using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. [Time frame: From admission to 3-month outpatient follow-up]
• Functional Outcome in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke After the Intervention, as Measured by the Modified Rankin Scale [Time frame: From admission to 3-month outpatient follow-up]