Menu
Recruiting NCT07056075

Prevention of Desaturations Using Positive Airway Pressure or Capnometry During ERCP

No phase Interventional Desaturation Hypoxemia ERCP

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Nasal PAP Ventilation System, Low Flow Oxygen, Capnometry.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Desaturation, Hypoxemia, ERCP. Basic parameters: 18 years — 99 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Austria
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Randomized, Controlled, Unblinded Trial Evaluating the Impact of Positive Airway Pressure and Capnometry Compared to Standard Management on the Rate of Desaturations During Nurse-administered Sedation ERCP

Overview

Although sedation during endoscopy is sufficiently safe, desaturations are among the most common side effects of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures, occurring in approximately 20-30% of cases. Sedation during endoscopy increases the complication rate, and a significant proportion of severe and serious side effects are respiratory/airway-related. However, most patients require sedation to complete the procedure and achieve adequate outcomes during therapeutic ERCP. Therefore, improved measures to increase ERCP safety are needed. Since the demand for anesthesia in many centers already (far) exceeds current capacities, performing additional ERCPs under general anesthesia is not an option. Innovative ways to improve cardiorespiratory monitoring or respiratory management during ERCP could offer a solution without significantly increasing costs. Fortunately, dedicated devices for respiratory management and/or monitoring during endoscopy already exist, but their impact on improving patient safety has not yet been well studied. Therefore, the aim of this prospective, randomized, open-label, non-interventional study is to investigate the effects of non-invasive airway management and respiratory monitoring devices on desaturation rate during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. For this purpose, 288 adult patients (male and female, 18+ years) undergoing ERCP for medical reasons will be enrolled and randomized to one of three groups: (i) airway management using positive airway pressure (PAP group), (ii) additional monitoring using capnography (capnography group), and (iii) a control group with standard monitoring/treatment (i.e., 2 L O2/min via nasal cannula) (control group). Patients are monitored during the ERCP procedure according to medical standards (non-invasive blood oxygen saturation measurement = SpO2, regular non-invasive blood pressure measurement, pulse), and all desaturation events (defined as an SpO2 \<85% for any duration according to guidelines) are recorded and treated according to guideline recommendations (the studies do not specify any measures for the (non-)treatment of desaturations). After the procedure, patients are followed (passively) for 30 days (review of medical records) to record late complications. The main outcome parameter is the comparison of the desaturation rate in the PAP versus the control group.

Interventions

  • Device Nasal PAP Ventilation System
    medical devices that provide nasal positive airway pressure ventilation during endoscopy
  • Device Low Flow Oxygen
    low flow oxygen though nasal cannula
  • Device Capnometry
    capnometry measurement

Primary outcome measures

  • Difference in desaturation rate [Time frame: during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography]
Secondary outcome measures (11)
  • Difference in desaturation rate [Time frame: during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography]
  • Difference in desaturation rate [Time frame: during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography]
  • Difference in desaturation rate [Time frame: during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography]
  • Rates of interventions for hypoxemic events [Time frame: during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography]
  • Rates of interventions for hypoxemic events [Time frame: during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography]
  • Rates of interventions for hypoxemic events [Time frame: during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography]
  • Lowest SpO2 [Time frame: during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography]
  • Median procedure length [Time frame: during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography]
  • Satisfaction with sedation [Time frame: Periprocedural]
  • Rate of sedation-related adverse events [Time frame: during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography]
  • Rate of SCOPE [Time frame: from ERCP up to 30 days after procedure]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • undergoing an interventional (intent) ERCP procedure
  • 18-99 years
  • Male or female
  • Nurse-administered sedation

Exclusion criteria

  • History of allergic reaction to Propofol
  • Tracheostomy
  • Procedure requiring intubation, general anesthesia, or anesthesiologist backup (acute exacerbation of obstructive lung disease, acute congestive heart failure, supra-glottic or sub-glottic tumor, septic shock, e.g.) according to the endoscopist in charge
  • Pregnant patients

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

Austria · 2 centers
  • Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Medical University Gr — Graz
  • Department of Internal Medicine 2, University Hospital of St Pölten — Sankt Pölten

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07056075 · PrePAP-ERCP

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗