Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07052422

VEN+DAC+Bu2Flu4 vs Bu2Flu5 Conditioning Regimen for Elderly Myeloid Malignancies Undergoing Allo-HSCT

Phase II / Phase III Interventional Older Patients Myeloid Malignancies Conditioning Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Venetoclax (VEN), Decitabine (DAC), Busulfan (Bu), Fludarabine (Flu).
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Older Patients, Myeloid Malignancies, Conditioning, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). Basic parameters: 60 years — 75 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Venetoclax+Decitabine+Busulfan+Fludarabine (VEN+DAC+Bu2Flu4) vs Busulfan+Fludarabine Conditioning Regimen (Bu2Flu5 ) for Older Patients With Myeloid Malignancies Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (Allo-HSCT)

Overview

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of venetoclax+decitabine+busulfan+fludarabine (VEN+DAC+Bu2Flu4) regimen with busulfan+fludarabine (Bu2Flu5) regimen in older patients with myeloid malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Detailed description

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potent curative approach for myeloid malignancies, but outcomes post-transplantation of older population were unsatisfactory. The conditioning regimen is an essential factor affecting outcomes post-transplantation. Currently, the optimal conditioning for older patients with myeloid malignancies remains unclear. Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens like busulfan plus cyclophosphamide, and busulfan plus fludarabine (Bu4Flu4-5) have low relapse rates, but high non-relapse mortality (NRM) is observed in older patients with myeloid malignancies. The development of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens such as Bu2Flu5 has decreased NRM and enhanced the feasibility of allo-HSCT in older patients with myeloid malignancies, but it appears to have higher relapse rate. Neither conventional MAC nor RIC regimens benefit older patients with myeloid malignancies. In recent years, some studies reported that the introduction of venetoclax (VEN) or decitabine (DAC) to MAC reduced relapse without increasing NRM in younger patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies. However, whether VEN and DAC combined with RIC regimen reduce relapse without increasing NRM, then improve survival in older patients with myeloid malignancies is unclear. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of VEN+DAC+Bu2Flu4 with Bu2Flu5 in older patients with myeloid malignancies undergoing allo-HSCT.

Interventions

  • Drug Venetoclax (VEN)
    Venetoclax (VEN) was administered at 400mg/day on days -10 to -4.
  • Drug Decitabine (DAC)
    Decitabine (DAC) was administered at 20mg/m2/day on days -10 to -8.
  • Drug Busulfan (Bu)
    Busulfan (Bu) was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -5 to -4.
  • Drug Fludarabine (Flu)
    Fludarabine (Flu) was administered at 30mg/m2/day on days -5 to -2.
  • Drug Fludarabine (Flu)
    Fludarabine (Flu) was administered at 30mg/m2/day on days -6 to -2.

Primary outcome measures

  • Disease-free survival (DFS) rate [Time frame: 2 year]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Overall survival (OS) rate [Time frame: 2 year]
  • Relapse incidence [Time frame: 2 year]
  • Non-relapse mortality (NRM) incidence [Time frame: 2 year]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • 60-75 years
  • Acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission or myelodysplastic syndrome
  • Willing to undergo the first allo-HSCT
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2

Exclusion criteria

  • Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure)
  • Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Publications

  • Ling Y, Xuan L, Xu N, Huang F, Fan Z, Guo Z, Xu X, Liu H, Lin R, Yu S, Zhang H, Jin H, Wu M, Liu C, Liang X, Ou R, Zhang Y, Liu X, Qu H, Zhai X, Sun J, Zhao Y, Liu Q. Busulfan Plus Fludarabine Compared With Busulfan Plus Cyclophosphamide for AML Undergoing HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 10;41(29):4632-4642. do PMID 37335960
  • Rambaldi A, Grassi A, Masciulli A, Boschini C, Mico MC, Busca A, Bruno B, Cavattoni I, Santarone S, Raimondi R, Montanari M, Milone G, Chiusolo P, Pastore D, Guidi S, Patriarca F, Risitano AM, Saporiti G, Pini M, Terruzzi E, Arcese W, Marotta G, Carella AM, Nagler A, Russo D, Corradini P, Alessandrino EP, Torelli GF, Scime R, Mordini N, Oldani E, Marfisi RM, Bacigalupo A, Bosi A. Busulfan plus cyc PMID 26429297
  • Devine SM, Owzar K, Blum W, Mulkey F, Stone RM, Hsu JW, Champlin RE, Chen YB, Vij R, Slack J, Soiffer RJ, Larson RA, Shea TC, Hars V, Sibley AB, Giralt S, Carter S, Horowitz MM, Linker C, Alyea EP. Phase II Study of Allogeneic Transplantation for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission Using a Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen: Results From Cancer and Leukemia G PMID 26527780
  • Xuan L, Dai M, Jiang E, Wang Y, Huang F, Fan Z, Xu N, Nie D, Liang X, Chen H, Ye J, Shi P, Liu H, Jin H, Lin R, Yan C, Zhang Y, Sun J, Han M, Liu Q. The effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning on relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelod PMID 36702138
  • Zheng X, Gao H, Lu N, Wang M, Zhang H, Zheng Y, Shen B, Cao Y, Chen X, Zhai W, Wei J, Yang D, Zhang R, Pang A, Feng S, Jiang E, Han M. Efficacy of venetoclax combined with decitabine conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in high-risk and elderly patients with myeloid neoplasms. Ann Hematol. 2023 Dec;102(12):3603-3611. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05500-2. Epub 2023 PMID 37878011

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07052422 · NFEC-2025-260

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗