Neuropsychological Evaluation in Intellectual Disability (ENDI)
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: ENDI (Neuropsychological Evaluation in Intellectual Disability).
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21), Neuropsychology, Cognitive Aging, Alzheimer Disease. Basic parameters: 25 years — 65 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- France
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Neuropsychological Evaluation in Intellectual Disability
Overview
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the acceptability ofpatients with trisomy 21 (T21) to perform the full battery of ENDI neurospychological tests and each of the subsets. In this study, three types of population will be recruted : normotypic volunteers, patients with Intellectual Disability and patients T21carriers. This study is separated into 2 phases : * A the preliminary phase : this phase will be used to evaluate subtest design, ergonomics and understanding of instructions, and to identify any malfunctions. The observations gathered will enable the principal investigator to refine the digital design of the battery in collaboration with the publishing company. In this phase, normotypical volunteers and patients with intellectual disabilities will be recruted to perform ENDI test battery. * A main phase : this phase will enable to answer to the main objective. in this phase, patients with Trisomy 21 aged between 25 and 65 will be recruted to perform ENDI test battery.
Detailed description
Trisomy 21 is a genetic disease resulting from a chromosomal anomaly, due to a triplication, bringing the total number of chromosomes to 47. In addition to physical characteristics, adults with Trisomy 21 (T21) generally have an intelligence quotient (IQ) score suggesting mild (IQ: 50-69) to moderate (IQ: 35-49) intellectual disability (ID), and adaptive functional impairments corresponding to this level of ID severity. Progress in medical and social care has led to a significant increase in life expectancy for trisomy 21 patients. De Graaf, Buckley \& Skotko (2021) estimate the number of trisomy 21 patients in France at around 35,000, 42% of whom are aged 40 or over. According to Asselin (2005), by 2030, the number of people with intellectual disabilities (ID) aged over 60 should have doubled.
This raises questions about the ageing of this population, all the more so as it is likely to occur earlier, due to reduced neuronal reserve. For example, signs of aging appear 10 years earlier in people with ID, at around age 55. Moreover, this aging process is said to be accelerated Normal cognitive aging in trisomy 21 patients is poorly characterized in the literature; similarly, there is no consensus regarding prodromal signs of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in T21. However, the presence of the supernumerary chromosome containing the APP (Amyloid Precursor Protein) gene increases the risk of developing AD: 20% of trisomy 21 patients aged 45 and over develop a major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD), and over 50% by the age of 55. T21 is now considered a genetic form of AD, similar to an autosomal dominant form. Identifying AD in this population is therefore a real challenge, especially as AD is identified as the cause of 70% of deaths in trisomy 21 patients.
In cognitive terms, the precursor signs of AD are impairment of memory and temporo-spatial orientation, followed by impairment of praxis, language and visuo-spatial skills. Other authors suggest an early decline in executive functions. More recently, Startin et al. (2019) show that memory and attention tests are more sensitive in detecting prodromal forms. Establishing a diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease in trisomy 21 patients is important for at least 3 reasons. People with intellectual disabilities are often treated with neuroleptics, whose use is not recommended in AD. It also contributes to the adaptation of medical and social care, as ageing disabled people with AD will experience less frequent difficulties, including behavioural changes. According to the Edinburgh Principles, it is important to "ensure that appropriate diagnostic, assessment and intervention resources and services are available to meet the individual needs and promote the healthy ageing of people with intellectual disabilities and cognitive impairment". Finally, at a time when promising pharmacological treatments for AD are emerging for neurotypical subjects, it seems crucial that trisomy 21 patients, who are more at risk of AD, should be diagnosed as early as possible so that they can ultimately benefit from these new therapies. Neuropsychological assessment plays a crucial role in the diagnostic process, as brain imaging and lumbar puncture for AD biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid are not always feasible.
However, a number of problems remain:
* Neuropsychological assessment is conditioned by the severity of the intellectual disability and the level of literacy/numeracy. * Few adapted tests are available in French. Tests used in the general population are not transposable, and those based on child assessment batteries are infantilizing. * Few tests incorporate the evolution of digital technologies, which make it possible to offer more playful interfaces with better temporal control. * Few tests allow for longitudinal follow-up (no parallel versions, no longitudinal standards), whereas current recommendations call for systematic annual follow-up from the age of 30. In this context, it is essential to develop new cognitive tools integrating digital technologies and innovative approaches, which are indispensable for accurate diagnosis and monitoring of cognitive disorders in trisomy 21 patients. It was with this in mind that the ENDI (Evaluation Neuropsychologique dans la Déficience Intellectuelle) battery was designed. This neuropsychological battery comprises 15 subtests designed to assess language, memory, attention and executive skills. By analyzing changes in trisomy 21 patients performance over time, the neuropsychologist can detect early signs of AD. A pre-test of the ENDI battery is planned to evaluate subtest design, ergonomics and comprehension of instructions, and to identify any malfunctions. The observations gathered will enable the principal investigator to refine the digital design of the battery in collaboration with the publishing company.
Interventions
- Diagnostic test ENDI (Neuropsychological Evaluation in Intellectual Disability)
This neuropsychological battery comprises 15 subtests designed to assess language, memory, attention and executive skills. By analyzing changes in Trisomy 21 patients performance over time, the neuropsychologist can detect early signs of Alzheimer's disease.
Primary outcome measures
- Acceptability of individual subtests and the complete test battery [Time frame: Through the study (completion of the full test battery), an average of 45 min]
- Acceptability of individual subtests and the complete test battery [Time frame: Through the study (completion of the full test battery), an average of 45 min]
- Acceptability of individual subtests and the complete test battery [Time frame: Through the study (completion of the full test battery), an average of 45 min]
- Acceptability of individual subtests and the complete test battery [Time frame: Through the study (completion of the full test battery), an average of 45 min]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
- The convergent validity of ENDI tests [Time frame: Through the study, an average of 16 months]
- The convergent validity of ENDI tests [Time frame: Through the study, an average of 16 months]
- The convergent validity of ENDI tests [Time frame: Through the study, an average of 16 months]
- The convergent validity of ENDI tests [Time frame: Through the study, an average of 16 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
Preliminary phase:
- The inclusion criteria for the group of people with intellectual disabilities are as follows:
- Participant who has received full information on the organization of the research and has not objected to his or her participation and to the use of his or her data.
- Legal guardian of the participant, if applicable, who has received full information on the organization of the research and has not objected to participation and use of his/her data.
- Age at inclusion: ≥ 25 and ≤ 65 years
- Notion of intellectual disability in medical records
- Access to the oral language of the participant with an intellectual disability: the subject's speech must be comprehensible to the evaluator and the subject must be able to understand simple statements. It is not possible to use an oral comprehension test (e.g. Token test by Renzi \& Vignolo, 1962), as the norms achieved in healthy subjects would exclude almost all patients with intellectual disabilities, who have more limited language skills.
- Enrolled in or benefiting from a social security scheme.
- The inclusion criteria for the normotypic group are as follows:
- Participant having received full information on the organization of the research and not having objected to his or her participation and to the use of his or her data.
- Age at inclusion: ≥ 25 and ≤ 65 years
- Affiliation with a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme
Main phase:
Inclusion criteria are as follows:
- Participant with T21 who has received full information on the organization of the research and has not objected to participation and use of his/her data
- Legal guardian of the participant with T21, where applicable, who has received full information on the organization of the research and has not objected to his or her participation and the use of his or her data.
- Person with trisomy 21
- Age at inclusion: ≥ 25 and ≤ 65 years
- Access to the oral language of the participant with T21: the subject's speech must be comprehensible to the evaluator and the subject must be able to understand simple statements. It is not possible to use an oral comprehension test (e.g. Token test by Renzi \& Vignolo, 1962), as the norms achieved in healthy subjects would exclude almost all patients with intellectual disabilities, who have more limited language skills.
- Membership of a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme
Exclusion Criteria for both phases of the study are as follows:
- Disabling motor and/or sensory impairments preventing completion of the tests
- Insufficient command of the French language to complete the tests
- Severe general medical condition or alcoholism (habitual consumption of 3 drinks/day or history of alcohol withdrawal)
- History of stroke, severe head trauma, or cancer
- Change in long-term medication within 8 weeks prior to evaluation
- Refusal to participate by the subject and/or legal representative
- Individuals referred to in Articles L.1121-5 to L.1121-7 of the French Public Health Code:
- Pregnant women, women in labor, or breastfeeding mothers
- Individuals deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
- Individuals undergoing psychiatric treatment under Article L.3213-1 of the French Public Health Code
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
Study locations
France · 1 center
- CHRU de Nancy — Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy
Publications
- Hithersay R, Startin CM, Hamburg S, Mok KY, Hardy J, Fisher EMC, Tybulewicz VLJ, Nizetic D, Strydom A. Association of Dementia With Mortality Among Adults With Down Syndrome Older Than 35 Years. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Feb 1;76(2):152-160. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3616. PMID 30452522
- Coquelet A, Besozzi A, Roussel M, Lemetayer F. Evaluation neuropsychologique des adultes porteurs d'une trisomie 21 en Consultation memoire : quels outils ? Une revue de la litterature. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2022 Mar 1;20(1):79-95. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2022.1025. French. PMID 35652846
- Coppus AW, Fekkes D, Verhoeven WM, Tuinier S, Egger JI, van Duijn CM. Plasma amino acids and neopterin in healthy persons with Down's syndrome. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2007;114(8):1041-5. doi: 10.1007/s00702-007-0656-1. Epub 2007 Mar 31. PMID 17401539
- Carmeli E, Imam B, Bachar A, Merrick J. Inflammation and oxidative stress as biomarkers of premature aging in persons with intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 25. PMID 22119683
- Burt DB, Aylward EH. Test battery for the diagnosis of dementia in individuals with intellectual disability. Working Group for the Establishment of Criteria for the Diagnosis of Dementia in Individuals with Intellectual Disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2000 Apr;44 ( Pt 2):175-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2000.00264.x. PMID 10898382
- Devenny DA, Zimmerli EJ, Kittler P, Krinsky-McHale SJ. Cued recall in early-stage dementia in adults with Down's syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2002 Sep;46(Pt 6):472-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00417.x. PMID 12354318
- Startin CM, Hamburg S, Hithersay R, Al-Janabi T, Mok KY, Hardy J; LonDownS Consortium; Strydom A. Cognitive markers of preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease in Down syndrome. Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Feb;15(2):245-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Nov 28. PMID 30503169
- Zis P, Strydom A. Clinical aspects and biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease in Down syndrome. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018 Jan;114:3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Sep 1. PMID 28870521
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07047963 · 2024- A01565- 42