Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07045207

Evaluating AI and Human Expert Decisions in Colorectal Cancer

Observational Colorectal Cancer

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: LLM-MDT.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Colorectal Cancer. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparison of Large Language Models and Expert Multidisciplinary Team Decisions in Colorectal Cancer

Overview

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the decision-making consistency between large language models (LLMs) and expert multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) in adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer who underwent MDT consultation between January 2023 and December 2024. The main questions it aims to answer are: How consistent are the treatment decisions generated by LLMs compared to actual MDT decisions? Do different LLMs (e.g., ChatGPT, DeepSeek) show varying levels of agreement with expert recommendations? What clinical factors contribute to differences between AI-generated and human expert decisions? Researchers will compare the AI-generated treatment recommendations with real-world MDT decisions using anonymized patient records to see if LLMs can reliably support clinical decision-making in oncology. Participants will: Have their de-identified clinical data (e.g., imaging, pathology, MDT notes) processed through several LLMs Not be contacted or receive any interventions, as this is a retrospective study using existing clinical records only.

Detailed description

This is a retrospective, non-interventional observational study aiming to evaluate the consistency between treatment decisions made by large language models (LLMs) and multidisciplinary team (MDT) experts in the management of colorectal cancer (CRC).

Colorectal cancer is a highly heterogeneous malignancy requiring personalized treatment strategies, often developed through MDT discussions that integrate input from surgery, oncology, radiology, pathology, and other specialties. While MDTs improve treatment planning and outcomes, they are time- and resource-intensive, and subject to variability in expert judgment. With the rise of artificial intelligence, especially LLMs such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek, there is growing interest in their potential role in assisting or standardizing clinical decision-making.

In this study, researchers will retrospectively analyze de-identified clinical records of approximately 1,500 patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer who underwent MDT consultation at a tertiary cancer center between January 2023 and December 2024. Key clinical data-including demographic information, imaging reports (CT, MRI), endoscopy results, pathology findings, and MDT recommendations-will be extracted and anonymized.

These de-identified records will be input into several LLMs (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Baichuan, and Qwen) running on secure offline servers. The models will be asked to generate treatment recommendations, which will be categorized into predefined decision codes (e.g., surgery, systemic therapy, chemoradiotherapy, further diagnostics). Each case will be input three times to assess the consistency of the model output.

The primary outcome is the agreement between AI-generated recommendations and original MDT decisions, quantified using Cohen's Kappa. Secondary analyses include comparison among LLMs using chi-squared tests, evaluation of output consistency via Fleiss' Kappa, and identification of clinical factors associated with discordant decisions.

This study does not involve any direct patient contact, intervention, or new clinical procedures. All data are historical and anonymized in accordance with ethical and legal requirements. The results are expected to inform the potential value, limitations, and appropriate use of AI in supporting multidisciplinary decision-making in oncology.

Interventions

  • Other LLM-MDT
    Leveraging large language models (LLMs) to Generate Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Treatment Recommendations

Primary outcome measures

  • Agreement Between AI-Generated and MDT Treatment Decisions [Time frame: January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 (based on MDT consultation date)]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Comparison of Agreement Across Different AI Models [Time frame: January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024]
  • Output Stability of AI Models on Repeated InputsDescription [Time frame: January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024]
  • Identification of Clinical Factors Associated With Decision Discordance [Time frame: January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of colorectal cancer
  • Patients who received multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation at Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2024
  • Availability of complete clinical records, including(MDT consultation notes, CT or MRI imaging reports, Pathology reports, Outpatient or inpatient medical summaries)

Exclusion criteria

  • Incomplete or missing medical records related to MDT decision-making
  • MDT consultations conducted for non-oncologic purposes (e.g., hernia evaluation, stoma planning)
  • Missing critical clinical data such as imaging or pathology reports
  • Duplicate or conflicting records that prevent reliable data analysis

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Case-only

Study locations

China · 1 center
  • Peking University Cancer Hospital — Beijing

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07045207 · PekingUCHI2025YJZ57

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗