Comparison of Two-Position and Four-Position Cervical Injection Techniques for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer Using Methylene Blue
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Sentinel Lymph Node Detection/Cervical Methylene Blue Injection.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Endometrial Neoplasms, Endometrial Cancer Stage I, Sentinel Lymph Node, Metastasis. Basic parameters: 18 years — 75 years · Female.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Turkey (Türkiye)
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Comparison of Two-Point and Four-Point Cervical Injection Techniques Using Methylene Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer
Overview
This clinical trial evaluates lymph node mapping in newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients undergoing surgery. The standard technique uses a 2-point methylene blue cervical injection. The study aims to determine if increasing injection points improves mapping success.
Detailed description
In recent years, Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) mapping has become a key focus in improving surgical outcomes for endometrial cancer. While methylene blue is a cost-effective option for SLN mapping, its detection rates remain suboptimal. This study aims to evaluate whether increasing the injection points from the standard 2-point to a 4-point methylene blue injection improves SLN mapping success.
This randomized controlled trial will include patients with preoperative stage I endometrial carcinoma. Participants will be randomized into two groups: one group will receive a 2-point methylene blue cervical injection, and the other group will receive a 4-point injection.
The primary endpoint is the difference in SLN detection rates between the two techniques. Findings from this study will provide detailed insights into whether the 4-point injection offers a significant advantage over the standard 2-point method.
Interventions
- Procedure Sentinel Lymph Node Detection/Cervical Methylene Blue Injection
Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) detection using cervical methylene blue injection is a surgical technique designed to identify the primary lymph nodes responsible for draining the uterus in patients with endometrial cancer. The procedure involves injecting methylene blue dye into specific locations within the cervical stroma to enable lymphatic uptake. The dye subsequently travels through the lymphatic channels, allowing for intraoperative visual identification of the sentinel nodes. This targeted app
Primary outcome measures
- Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Detection Rate [Time frame: 1 day]
- Sensitivity of SLN Biopsy for Detecting Lymph Node Metastases [Time frame: 1 day]
- Specificity of SLN Biopsy for Detecting Lymph Node Metastases [Time frame: 1 day]
- Rate of Positive SLNs Detected [Time frame: 1 day]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
- Procedure Duration [Time frame: 1 day]
- Complications and Side Effects - Injection-Related Side Effects [Time frame: 1 month]
- SLN Anatomical Distribution [Time frame: 1 day]
- Surgical Complications [Time frame: 1 month]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Individuals diagnosed with stage I endometrial cancer based on CT and PET-CT imaging.
- Individuals with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer.
Exclusion criteria
Medical Conditions
- Individuals diagnosed with dementia.
- Individuals with allergies to methylene blue or iodine.
- Individuals who have received active treatment for another malignancy within the past five years.
- Inability to successfully perform PLD (pelvic lymphadenectomy) or history of prior PLD.
- Women with multiple and confluent lymph nodes identified as positive on FDG-PET/CT (such cases are not considered stage I).
Cancer-Related Conditions
- Individuals with clinically or radiologically identified positive lymph nodes or metastatic disease.
- Individuals with a history of pelvic dissection and/or radiation therapy.
- Individuals with advanced cervical or uterine cancer.
- Individuals with T3/T4 lesions.
- Individuals with cervical tumors larger than 2 cm.
Organ Dysfunction
- Individuals with hepatic dysfunction and a MELD score ≥ 10 and creatinine ≥ 2·0 mg/dl patients.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Double blind
- Primary purpose
- Diagnostic
Study locations
Turkey (Türkiye) · 2 centers
- Ankara University — Ankara
- Dokuz Eylul University — Izmir
Publications
- Sehnal B, Waldauf P, Matej R, Hruda M, Robova H, Drozenova J, Pichlik T, Zapletal J, Rob L, Halaska MJ. Comparison of tracer application methods for sentinel lymph node detection in open surgery patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14037-8. PMID 40200256
- Holloway RW, Abu-Rustum NR, Backes FJ, Boggess JF, Gotlieb WH, Jeffrey Lowery W, Rossi EC, Tanner EJ, Wolsky RJ. Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):405-415. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 May 28. PMID 28566221
- Salman L, Cusimano MC, Marchocki Z, Ferguson SE. Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: Current evidence and practice. J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan;129(1):117-119. doi: 10.1002/jso.27550. Epub 2023 Dec 7. PMID 38059317
- Leitao MM Jr, Zhou QC, Gomez-Hidalgo NR, Iasonos A, Baser R, Mezzancello M, Chang K, Ward J, Chi DS, Long Roche K, Sonoda Y, Brown CL, Mueller JJ, Gardner GJ, Jewell EL, Broach V, Zivanovic O, Dowdy SC, Mariani A, Abu-Rustum NR. Patient-reported outcomes after surgery for endometrial carcinoma: Prevalence of lower-extremity lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping versus lymphadenectomy. Gynec PMID 31780238
- Terada S, Tanaka T, Murakami H, Tsuchihashi H, Toji A, Daimon A, Miyamoto S, Nishie R, Ueda S, Hashida S, Morita N, Maruoka H, Konishi H, Kogata Y, Taniguchi K, Komura K, Ohmichi M. Lymphatic Complications Following Sentinel Node Biopsy or Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer. J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 7;12(13):4540. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134540. PMID 37445574
- Altin D, Taskin S, Ortac F, Tokgozoglu N, Vatansever D, Guler AH, Gungor M, Tasci T, Bese T, Turan H, Kahramanoglu I, Yalcin I, Celik C, Demirkiran F, Kose F, Arvas M, Ayhan A, Taskiran C. Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel node biopsy in non-endometrioid, high-grade and/or deep myoinvasive endometrial cancer: A Turkish gynecologic oncology group study (TRSGO-SLN-006). Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Mar;164(3): PMID 35033380
- Niikura H, Kaiho-Sakuma M, Tokunaga H, Toyoshima M, Utsunomiya H, Nagase S, Takano T, Watanabe M, Ito K, Yaegashi N. Tracer injection sites and combinations for sentinel lymph node detection in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Nov;131(2):299-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Aug 27. PMID 23988415
- Geppert B, Lonnerfors C, Bollino M, Arechvo A, Persson J. A study on uterine lymphatic anatomy for standardization of pelvic sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 May;145(2):256-261. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Feb 10. PMID 28196672
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07040657 · 693-SBKAEK