Effects on Subacute Stroke With Robotic Assistive Gait Training
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Freewalk lower limb Robotic Assistive Gait Training, Physiotherapy.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Stroke, Stroke Gait Rehabilitation. Basic parameters: 45 years — 70 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Taiwan
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
The Effectiveness of Subacute Stroke Patients Receiving Robotic Assisted Gait Training
Overview
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to learn about the effects of Robotic Assisted Gait Training (RAGT) combined with traditional physical therapy in subacute stroke patients. The main question it aims to answer is: \- Does RAGT combined with traditional physical therapy improve gait and functional performance in subacute stroke patients compared to traditional physical therapy alone? Participants who are subacute stroke patients will be randomly assigned to receive either both RAGT and traditional physical therapy or only traditional physical therapy. Their gait and functional performance will be assessed during the study period.
Detailed description
The sequelae of stroke have a significant impact on patients' physical functions and quality of life. Although traditional physical therapy can help some patients regain function, its effectiveness is often limited. Therefore, exploring new rehabilitation technologies has become one of the key tasks in the medical field. Robotic Assisted Gait Training (RAGT) is an emerging technology that provides high-intensity and repetitive gait training, making it particularly suitable for patients in the post-stroke rehabilitation phase. Recent studies have shown that RAGT can significantly improve gait abilities in stroke patients, including walking speed and functional performance. Therefore, this study will adopt a randomized controlled trial design, recruiting 20 subacute stroke patients who will be randomly assigned to either a group receiving both RAGT and traditional physical therapy or a group receiving only traditional physical therapy. The study will compare differences in gait and functional performance between the two groups during the rehabilitation process, aiming to provide a foundation for future personalized and precision treatment plans.
Interventions
- Device Freewalk lower limb Robotic Assistive Gait Training
Participants in this group will receive robotic-assisted gait training three times per week (every other day) for 30 minutes per session, using the FREE Walk exoskeleton device (FREE Bionics, Taiwan). The device assists with walking, standing, and sitting. A physical therapist will help the participant wear the exoskeleton and supervise the training, adjusting the level of robotic support and intensity based on the participant's ability. In addition to RAGT, participants will receive conventiona - Other Physiotherapy
Participants in this group will receive conventional stroke rehabilitation therapy (including sit to stand, balance and gait training) 5 days/week, 30 minutes per session. Intervention Duration: 4 weeks.
Primary outcome measures
- Gait Speed [Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention]
- Step Length [Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention]
- Toe Clearance [Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention]
- Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) [Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention]
- Functional Independence Measure (FIM) [Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
- Berg Balance Scale (BBS) [Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention]
- 30-Second Chair Stand Test (30-CST) [Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention]
- Surface Electromyography (sEMG) [Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention]
- Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) [Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Diagnosed with stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) confirmed by medical imaging.
- Subacute phase of stroke (onset within 1 to 3 months).
- Moderate to good standing balance ability.
- Sufficient cognitive ability to understand the study and follow instructions.
- Able to participate in rehabilitation training during the study period.
Exclusion criteria
- Body weight over 90 kg.
- Presence of other neurological disorders.
- Severe cardiovascular disease or other health conditions affecting mobility.
- Significant lower limb pain, joint contracture, or spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score > 3) that impairs walking.
- Diagnosed with cardiopulmonary disease that contraindicates exercise training.
- Cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of training instructions or completion of questionnaires.
- Inability to complete the rehabilitation training protocol.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Taiwan · 1 center
- Changhua Christian Hospital — Changhua
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07040215 · 250321