Menu
Recruiting NCT07027709

Clinical Performance of Hybrid Ceramic Laminate Veneers

No phase Interventional Bonding of Veneers After Different Treatment

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: BeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation, HC Primer pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Bonding of Veneers After Different Treatment. Basic parameters: from 21 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Egypt
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Clinical Performance of Hybrid Ceramic Laminate Veneers With Two Pretreatment Protocols: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the clinical performance of laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks pretreated with BeautiBond Xtreme versus HC Primer, using BeautiLink SA cement. The study focuses on marginal adaptation, retention, discoloration, and recurrent caries over 18 months.

Detailed description

This clinical trial compares two bonding protocols for hybrid ceramic laminate veneers. The veneers are fabricated from HC hard blocks and bonded using BeautiLink SA resin cement. One group receives BeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment, while the other receives HC Primer. The study assesses marginal adaptation, retention, recurrent caries, and discoloration over 18 months to determine the superior clinical bonding protocol for these restorations.

Interventions

  • Device BeautiBond Xtreme pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation
    Laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks were pretreated on the internal surface with BeautiBond Xtreme, then bonded to tooth structure using BeautiLink SA self-adhesive resin cement. The tooth surfaces were also treated with BeautiBond Xtreme. Veneers were digitally designed and milled, then cemented following a standardized clinical protocol.
  • Procedure HC Primer pretreatment with BeautiLink SA cementation
    Laminate veneers fabricated from HC hard blocks were pretreated on the internal surface with HC Primer, then bonded to tooth structure using BeautiLink SA self-adhesive resin cement. The tooth surfaces were treated with BeautiBond Xtreme. Veneers were digitally designed and milled, then cemented following the same clinical protocol used in the experimental grou

Primary outcome measures

  • Primary Outcome: Marginal Adaptation [Time frame: Measured at 6, 12, 18 months.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:dult patients ≥ 21 years requiring laminate veneers in the esthetic zone, vital or endodontically treated teeth, sufficient enamel, willing and able to consent and comply.

\-

Exclusion Criteria: Periodontal disease, bruxism, poor hygiene, pregnancy, systemic illness, allergies, insufficient enamel, ongoing trials, orthodontic treatment.

\-

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Egypt · 1 center
  • Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University — Cairo

Publications

  • Çötert İ, Çötert HS. Survival of partial laminate veneers and categorical covariates affecting the survival: a systematic review. Open Dent J. 2023;17(1) Ho CCK. Appraisal and cementation of porcelain laminate veneers. In: Banerji S, Mehta SB, Ho CCK, editors. Practical procedures in aesthetic dentistry. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2017. Bajaj M, Jha P, Nikhil V. Shade selection in esthetic de

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07027709 · CU-FP-HCLV-001

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗