Menu
Recruiting NCT07020910

Bad Berka Heart Rhythm Registry of Patients With or at Risk of Arrhythmias Treated at Heart Center Bad Berka

Observational Cardiac Arrhythmias

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Cardiac Arrhythmias. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Germany
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

The Bad Berka Heart Rhythm Registry (2B2R) is a Prospective, Single-center Observational Cohort Evaluating Safety, Efficacy, and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Arrhythmia Therapy or CIED Implantation at the Heart Center Bad Berka

Overview

The Bad Berka Heart Rhythm Registry (2B2R) is a prospective, single-center observational cohort designed to systematically collect and analyze data of patients undergoing cardiac arrhythmia therapy as well as implantation of cardiac electronic devices (CIEDs) at the Heart Center Bad Berka. The register aims to evaluate procedural safety, acute and long-term efficacy, and clinical outcomes across a broad spectrum of arrhythmias and interventional strategies, including novel technologies such as pulsed field ablation (PFA) and conduction system pacing. The registry is intended to generate real-world evidence to support clinical decision-making, identify predictors of outcomes, and contribute to quality assurance and innovation in the field of cardiac electrophysiology.

Detailed description

The field of cardiac electrophysiology continues to evolve rapidly, with new tools and techniques improving both arrhythmia diagnosis and therapy. While randomized controlled trials provide critical insights, real-world data from clinical practice are essential to evaluate safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes across diverse patient populations and treatment modalities.

The 2B2R registry aims to bridge this gap by collecting comprehensive clinical data of patients referred for cardiac arrhythmia treatment including drug therapy, electrophysiological studies, catheter ablation (e.g. atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial and AV-node dependent supraventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular contractions, and ventricular tachycardia), interventional stroke-prevention, as well as device implantation at the Heart Center Bad Berka.

Data will be prospectively collected, procedural parameters, complication rates, acute success, follow-up outcomes, imaging, device therapy, and patient-reported outcomes will be assessed. Substudies focused on specific arrhythmias or technologies (e.g., pulsed field ablation, high-density mapping, or device therapy such as conduction system pacing) will be embedded within the registry.

The data will be analyzed to: - Evaluate clinical effectiveness and safety of interventional EP procedures - Assess predictors of arrhythmia recurrence or procedural complications - Compare technologies and procedural strategies

\- Monitor quality metrics and inform continuous process improvement Participation in the registry does not influence clinical management which remains at the discretion of the treating physicians. The registry complies with all applicable data protection and ethical standards.

Primary outcome measures

  • Acute Treatment Success [Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural]
  • Safety (peri-procedural Complications) [Time frame: within 30 days]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
  • Arrhythmia Recurrence [Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year]
  • All-cause Rehospitalization [Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year]
  • Symptom and Quality of Life Improvement [Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year]
  • Device Therapy Outcomes (in patients with CIEDs)- 1.Lead performance - [Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year]
  • Device Therapy Outcomes (in patients with CIEDs) - 2. Appropriate and inappropriate therapies- [Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year]
  • Device Therapy Outcomes (in patients with CIEDs)-3. Device related complications- [Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • At risk of or with documented cardiac arrhythmia undergoing medical or interventional therapy at the Heart Center Bad Berka
  • Informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
  • Participation in another interventional trial that precludes registry inclusion

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Germany · 1 center
  • Zentralklinik Bad Berka — Bad Berka

Publications

  • Keelani A, Alothman O, Borisov G, Frommhold M, Bartoli L, Abdelwahab H, D'Ambrosio G, Shehri SA, Raffa S, Geller JC. Feasibility and Clinical Efficacy of Focal Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Non-Pulmonary Vein Triggered Atrial Arrhythmia From the Superior Caval Vein. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Feb;36(2):359-366. doi: 10.1111/jce.16510. Epub 2024 Dec 10. PMID 39654529

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07020910 · # 23333/2024/62

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗